Skip to main content

A party that governs well but communicates poorly was set back by a party that obstructs well but is more interested in holding power than in governing.

[ Illustrated version at Levees Not War ]

Not Good, But Could Have Been Worse

What could have been a hideous wipeout following a grotesque campaign season was instead a series of setbacks, strong disappointments, and some reliefs and bright spots. Among the setbacks we sadly count the Illinois and Pennsylvania senate races where the Democratic candidates came very close. Among the strong disappointments were the losses of progressives like Russ Feingold, Alan Grayson, and Tom Perriello. Ouch. But we were relieved by the victories of senate majority leader Harry Reid, California senator Barbara Boxer, and among the bright spots are the gubernatorial victories of Andrew Cuomo in New York and Jerry Brown in California.

But the Democratic party is in serious trouble in the midsection of the country, with painful losses from Pennsylvania west to Wisconsin . . . Obama already is not strong in the South (which sometimes includes Florida), and that’s not likely to change. (Also disappointing was Charlie Melancon’s loss to David Vitter in Louisiana; Vitter ran against Obama, disregarding Melancon.) Obama and the Democratic party must get something in gear—something like employment, jobs programs, and a focused communications department—to regain support among the Rust Belt and Midwestern voters.

How to Interpret the Election?

Of course Republicans are claiming a mandate, but that’s ridiculous (and not at all supported by this CBS exit poll). We think the election results are more a matter of a sick economy (see below), Democrats’ failure to clearly explain and promote their accomplishments, and massive GOP and conservative negative advertising + 24/7 Fox News propaganda (aka the Republican Noise Machine). While Republicans insist the election results are a "referendum on Obama’s agenda" and "the voice of the American people," let’s not forget that the GOP Tea Party candidates’ ads and secret, shadow groups’ attacks on Democrats were funded by millions of dollars from Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Spending on congressional campaigns was expected to reach $4 billion. The GOP started campaigning around the inauguration; the Democrats, preoccupied with legislative accomplishments (see below), were late to the game. Further, remember that the so-called Tea Party, though it had grass-roots origins, has largely been co-opted and the Tea Party as it is now is not a people’s movement in the traditional sense: it is corporate-sponsored, establishment-driven. Ask Dick Armey and the billionaire Koch brothers. So much for "the voice of the American people."

And "It’s the Economy, Stupid." Comparisons with the 1994 midterms (after Clinton’s first 18 months) are common, but the economy is far worse now, with unemployment officially at 9.6 percent (it’s actually much higher). A closer comparison—which Republicans don’t mention—would be 1982, after Reagan’s first 18 months, when the unemployment rate was about 10 percent: Democrats gained 27 seats, cementing their majority. In 1994 unemployment was about 5.6 percent. It is now about 9.6 percent, with some 15 million people out of work, and that’s only counting the people who have not given up in despair and not counting the under-employed (those working part-time instead of full-time). Reporter Robert Scheer says some 50 million Americans have either lost their homes through foreclosures or their home values are underwater: the amounts owed on their mortgages exceed the property’s market value. (We recommend Sheer’s new book, The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street.)

Need we add that the Republicans have done nothing to help create jobs, but instead have blocked extensions of unemployment insurance, voted against tax breaks for small businesses—often voting against their own ideas—and massively resisted the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the Stimulus). They wanted to intensify the economic pain and thwart the president in order to regain power. This will be their strategy for the next two years as well. Gird your loins.

Much Accomplished, Much More to Be Done

Like just about everyone at Daily Kos, Levees Not War has complained possibly too much about what the president and the Democrats have not done. Perhaps most frustrating, though, is that the Democrats in Congress and the White House failed to communicate to the nation the astonishingly productive legislative record that they have accomplished over the past 21 months. With bill after bill, the Donkey kicked ass, but you’d never know it from them.

On Monday, Nov. 1, The Rachel Maddow Show produced a 15-minute segment highlighting the many accomplishments of the 111th Congress. The list is impressive—"the most legislatively productive 21 months in decades"—and we only wish the DNC had boasted far and wide about these bills. With more effective messaging (and a stronger focus on job creation, of course), the Dems could have countered the GOP distortions and rallied stronger base support and thus invigorated voter turnout.

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act to help victims of pay discrimination—especially women—challenge unequal pay. Signed by President Obama January 29, 2009.

Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 expanded health insurance coverage to more than 4 million children and pregnant women. Signed by President Obama February 4, 2009.

Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act (2009), giving about $6 billion over 5 years and increasing the number of full-time and part-time national service (AmeriCorps) volunteers from 75,000 to 250,000. Creates new programs focused on special areas like strengthening schools, improving health care for low-income communities, boosting energy efficiency and cleaning up parks, etc. Signed by President Obama April 21, 2009.

Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (2009) sponsored by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), described by Money magazine as " best friend a credit card user ever had." Credit Card Bill of Rights signed by President Obama May 22, 2009.

College student loan reform, March 2010: as part of the health care reform legislation, a provision "that would cut funding to private student lenders and redirect billions of dollars in expected savings into grants to needy students" (W.Post).

Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave FDA power to regulate tobacco. Signed by President Obama June 22, 2009.

Hate Crimes Prevention Act (aka Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act), made it a federal crime to commit assault based on victim’s gender, sexual orientation, etc. Signed by President Obama Oct. 28, 2009.

Car Allowance Rebate System (aka "Cash for Clunkers"): Begun in June 2009, and by August the auto industry was reporting strong sales—only about a half year after GM and Chrysler were bailed out by Washington. Boosted sales of safer and more fuel-efficient cars, helping clear the air and stimulating the economy.

Veterans benefited from the Veterans Health Care Budget Reform and Transparency Act of 2009, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, and the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act of 2010. The American Legion said, "in our view the real successes [of the 111th Congress] were the passage of bills that affected nearly every veteran in America."

All this is even before the big-ticket items of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (aka The Stimulus), the monumental (and incremental) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (health care reform: click here for healthcare.gov), and the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010), which included establishment of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, presently being (unofficially) headed by Harvard law professor and consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren.

All of this was done with virtually no help from the Republicans in Congress. (Honorable Exception: Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah was one of the authors of the Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act.)

Oh, and while all this was happening—you’d never know it to listen to the Noise Machine (or the Democrats)—Democrats actually reduced the deficit. The U.S. deficit shrank 9% in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2010, the fastest one-year deficit reduction since 1984. The budget shortfall of $1.294 trillion was down $122 billion from the previous fiscal year. The deficit’s ratio to economic output fell to 8.9 percent of the gross domestic product, down from an even 10 percent of GDP in fiscal 2009. What you also never hear from Republicans is how there was a budget surplus when George W. Bush took office in 2001.

This is a legislative record to be very proud of, and we are grateful to the House and Senate members who took difficult but principled votes in the public interest but who, for reasons large and small, complex and simple, did not win reelection. We regret that the DNC and the White House did not alert the nation about all the good policy work they were doing while the Republicans were busy hogging the microphones on cable news shows.

Looking Forward to Pressing Onward

We anticipate gridlock, acrimony, more Republican Tea Party antics (cat fights and power struggles between Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell, for example, and between Sarah Palin and Christine O’Donnell).

On Wednesday in his press conference President Obama said "Let’s find those areas where we can agree."

How’s that going to work?

Republicans have been repetitively transmitting "no compromise" messages for weeks now. In October Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell said, "The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president." And John Boehner, the likely speaker of the House, says of Obama’s agenda, "We’re going to do everything—and I mean everything we can do—to kill it, stop it, slow it down, whatever we can."

It is perverse and dismaying that a Party of No that has done nothing but stand in the way of efforts to repair damages they caused or enabled—wars, deficits, deregulation—is rewarded by impatient, fearful, stressed-out voters whose anger that party has deliberately and cynically inflamed.

Dismaying but also energizing: we’re not going to let them get away with the distortions, and we’ll be pressing the White House and Harry Reid and other Democratic leaders to aggressively call out the GOP’s lies and force the Republicans into votes that will show what they’re really made of. We’ll urge Reid and the president to assertively propose jobs and infrastructure and energy programs: let the GOP be seen in broad daylight saying no to jobs bills in the name of curbing the deficits they created.

This election was not a great rebuke of the Democratic party or of the president’s agenda (again, see the CBS exit poll), but rather a predictable response to prolonged and widespread unemployment and economic anxiety. Further, as the president acknowledged, many voters may have misinterpreted the administration’s emergency response to the economic crisis—support of TARP for Wall Street and the auto industry bailouts—as a "big government overreach" agenda, as if that was what Obama had wanted to do all along. Where would people get that idea?

. . . I think it’s understandable that folks said to themselves, you know, maybe this is the agenda, as opposed to a response to an emergency. And that’s something that I think everybody in the White House understood was a danger. We thought it was necessary, but I’m sympathetic to folks who looked at it and said this is looking like potential overreach.

In addition, there were a bunch of price tags that went with that. And so, even though these were emergency situations, people rightly said, gosh, we already have all this debt, we already have these big deficits . . .

The president has delivered on a lot of campaign promises, but millions are still out of work. The Republicans will not deliver on jobs, either, unless they suddenly convert to New Deal–type employment programs. Of course they will not. They have no agenda but to extend tax cuts for the wealthiest and to serve the corporations who paid for their campaign ads, and to oppose Obama at all times.

We also anticipate keeping our sleeves rolled up. We will try to help build support for President Obama’s National Infrastructure Bank idea, which he mentioned again in his press conference. When asked how he and the government could push forward with job creation when the GOP opposes expenditures without spending that the GOP would oppose, the president replied that traditionally investments in infrastructure programs have bipartisan appeal, and he will press forward on that initiative with congressional leaders. We like that idea very much. We’ll have his back, and we’ll be pushing Congress, too. (Connecticut Democratic Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro is one of the principal "parents" of this idea. Obama has been talking it up since at least February 2008.)

More deep thoughts to come as we ponder and regroup . . .

What do you think?

*

Originally posted to laflaur on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 08:41 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mll, mungley

    Mark LaFlaur / LeveesNotWar.org

    by laflaur on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 08:41:56 AM PDT

  •  A Failure to Turn Out and Vote (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Salo

    this diary could have been one clause long.

    •  one clause long (0+ / 0-)

      That would be your diary, not mine. I tend to be wordy. Yes, a failure among many young voters to turn out, compared to 2008, for sure. How did turnout overall compare with previous midterms? I don't know about that. I worked on phone banks for OFA to turn out the vote, and so did thousands of others, for Organizing for America, MoveOn, and other groups.

      Mark LaFlaur / LeveesNotWar.org

      by laflaur on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 09:28:24 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  It couldn't have been worse (0+ / 0-)

    My sense of things is that gutting Social Security needs three things:

    A Republican House, a 50-50 sort of Senate and an executive seeking bipartisanship.

    The house crafts bills containing draconian cuts, conservadems deliver a few votes to pass the cuts in the Senate and Obama dutifully signs the bill in the interests of commity.

    It's so slick it almost looks cheographed to me.

    TeaShirt Psalm: 40-18 Thou hast also given me the necks of mine enemies; that I might destroy them that hate me.

    by Salo on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 08:56:09 AM PDT

    •  dude, we lost a fucking mid term election. (0+ / 0-)

      it's not the end of democracy for fucks sake!  
       
      we lost in the south mostly gains we made because of an anti republican wave in 06 and 08.  and the purple swing states swung back to the republicans in typical 'vote against the party in power when the economy is bad' fashion.
      meanwhile in the west we gained ground!  and we held in the northeast.

      i'd say that the only person who lost that we should actually feel bad about is russ in wisconsin.  that's it.

      in 2012 we'll pick up senate seats in Massachusetts and Connecticut.  some of the swing states will swing back our way again.  

      don't believe the bullshit that we had achieved anything but a temporary high in 06 and 08.

      the real advances we are making are in the west.  we have almost locked up the west.  the republicans will be stuck in the south and fighting over the swing states.  

      we still winning.

      We live in hard time. Not end times. - Jon Stewart

      by bluefaction on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 09:39:46 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  "not the end of democracy" (0+ / 0-)

        Thanks, BlueFaction. You're putting things in better perspective. We keep on workin'.

        Mark LaFlaur / LeveesNotWar.org

        by laflaur on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 10:06:31 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  Straw man. (0+ / 0-)

        I'm talking about gutting spending and gutting pensions.

        This isn't about the franchise.

        TeaShirt Psalm: 40-18 Thou hast also given me the necks of mine enemies; that I might destroy them that hate me.

        by Salo on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 10:17:31 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site