Skip to main content

Like so many of us here, we've been licking the wounds of Tuesday.  I've decided to vent a little here.  Not a rant, but just a list of what I want to see happen.

We really do need some changes.  Go over the jump to see some of the ones I would make.

At the DNC:  
New leadership.  Tim Kaine was like a non-entity.  For all the news I watch on television and the on web and all the reading I do, I felt like I either never saw him, except in the last few weeks.   It’s long past time to bring back Howard Dean.  He knows how to fight, he knows how to articulate a vision, and he proved he knows how to run a political party.

The Senate:
In the Senate, we need new leadership.  I am thrilled beyond belief and greatly relieved that the people of Nevada sent Harry Reid back to DC, but the time for him to step down as Majority Leader is now.  In fact, I believe his term is up.  We need someone loud and unafraid to stand up to the most selfish, most backward, most evil group of politicians this country has ever produced.  

Chuck Schumer is the person for the job.  He helped engineer the Democratic takeover of the Senate from the GOP a few years ago.  Some people say he’s too close to Wall Street, but remember, that’s part of his state.  To us in New York City, the financial industry is incredibly important.  Yes, it needs to be carefully watched and regulated, but it also needs to be able to properly function and to make money.  

As leader, Schumer would be all over television.  Yes, the man has never met a press conference he didn’t love.  But we need that.  Think of how many interviews Senator Asshole Turtle from Kentucky has been in as compared to Mr. Reid.

The House:
In the House, we need a leadership change there too.  I love Nancy Pelosi, but if she follows tradition, she should be stepping down from her leadership position.  We need someone who won’t be afraid to tell John Boehner to go burn in the tanning machine.  Andrew Weiner or Debbie Wasserman-Schultz would be awesome in the role of Minority Leader.

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
In the White House, I am thrilled to see David Plouffe back.  The person there who needs to change the most is none other than the President himself.  We’ve all read enough diaries here about him need to drop the bi-partisan crap and the compromise idiocy.  It just isn’t going to happen.  It didn’t happen the GOP was the minority in the House and an even smaller minority in the Senate, it isn’t going to start now.  I don’t know who can convince him of what he needs to do.  Maybe Hillary Clinton should be Chief of Staff?  

He needs to go into campaign mode, immediately and it can’t stop until he leaves office, I hope on January 20, 2017.  If he doesn’t, he risks leaving on a date four years earlier.    

He needs a more boisterous press secretary.  Robert Gibbs is good, but we need loud.  Quiet snark and sarcasm don’t cut it.  We need someone familiar with government operation and the media.  Stick Lawrence O’Donnell behind that podium everyday at 2:00pm and we won’t see any prisoners left behind.  

All of the above:  
They need a master wordsmith.  I don’t mean a good speech writer, but an advertising person.  We’d all pay for a chance to punch Frank Luntz in the face, but the asshole knows exactly what words will push the right buttons.  I cannot believe that there isn’t a Democrat out in the world who can’t outdo the GOP on that.   Things need to be kept simple.

An example of this: The health care reform act.   It=s official name is the American Health Care Affordability Act... I think.  Why wasn=t it just called the "Medicare Expansion Act?"  Oh sure, I know it really doesn’t expand Medicare as we know it.  So we should have just changed the definition to include tax credits to buy insurance for those under 65.  Everyone loves Medicare, and poof, the tenor of the bill changes.   Instead the administration picked some long name that I can=t even get straight and that no one uses...and even Dems say Obamacare.  

Money.  
Boatloads of money.  Last night there was a diary suggesting that 20 million Democrats need to contribute $20 a month for the next two years, raising almost $10 billion.  Crazy?  Not at all.  If the right put on over 100,000 commercials for this election, we need to be able to put on 500,000 in 2012.  We need to try and get the DISCLOSE Act passed, but we also need to play the same game as the GOP.  Where were our multimillionaires?  I’m thrilled that George Soros gave a million dollars to Media Matters, but I’d rather see him and other Democratic billionaires match what the Koch Brothers are doing.   (By the way, if you don’t think the Chuckie and David won’t each chip in half a billion or so each to buy the 2012 vote....well, you know.)

Protests.  
Again, time to take a page from the enemy.  Whether they be small, local things that just get covered in a local paper or a couple hundred thousand on the Mall, it’s all about making noise, lots and lots of noise.

I always wondered, where were the protests on our side during the health care insanity.  Why did we let the tea party loons have the stage all the time?  

Conclusions:
I purposely didn't deal with specific pieces of legislation here, because that should be a no brainer.  We've all read here and heard from Rachel Maddow how much the 111th Cong. and the White House accomplished, but all of that is nothing when the great voting masses think you've done nothing or have destroyed their lives or some other bullshit.

The campaign that begins now is not just for the 113th Congress.  It isn’t just for the White House.  It’s for the future of the country.  It’s for the 98% of Americans who make less than $250,000 a year.  In fact, it’s even for the 2% who make more than that, because if we lose everything to the right wing lunatics, a day of reckoning will arrive and even the Koch Brothers will have trouble making $250K a year, not to mention our freedoms will be gone as well.

Originally posted to oxfdblue on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 01:27 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  We should definitely set out an agenda (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oxfdblue

    now, in priority order, understanding that priorities can change. And, we should definitely come up with selling slogans for every one of them. It's not that I want to be like a Republican, but they won repeating memorable slogans, many of them not even truthful!

    We need a jobs program ASAP, and we need to keep reminding everyone that tax cuts did not create jobs or save the economy for George Bush.

    Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction -- Pascal

    by RJDixon74135 on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 01:41:13 PM PDT

  •  Thank God! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oxfdblue

    calm, clear and I even agree with almost all of what you say. I will say that on the "master wordsmith" front we may have trouble. People who are interested in governing from facts and logic and all that stuff will have a really hard time matching Frank Luntz and the rest of the Rove stable of liars. 20 million Democrats giving $20 a month with all of our identities open for the next 2 years sounds about perfect. We have to draw a strong contrast between our open fundraising policy and what happened to us this election. We lost partly because of all of the other, "tear your hair out" reasons cited in all of these other diaries. Mostly we lost because we got righteously outspent in a lot of small, low-publicity House elections where people don't know the name, just the commercial.  

    We hold these truths to be self-evident ...

    by randy lynn on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 01:41:21 PM PDT

  •  Bravo! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oxfdblue

    And may there be many other "rants" of this kind: well-reasoned, well-written and constructive. A great place to jump off from and discuss ideas.

    Doesn't hurt one bit that I happen to particularly like a lot of your  ideas!

    "No, I still got *my* saber, Reverend. Didn't turn it into no plough-share, neither."

    by brooklyns finest on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 02:09:14 PM PDT

  •  A mini rant of my own. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    oxfdblue, DemandTruth

    The flaw of Democrats in general and President Obama in particular is that they give the American populace far too much credit for intelligence.  The accomplishments made in the last two years require nuanced understanding. long-term view and rational, unemotional analysis of the actual lay of the land.  These are not qualities I would ascribe to Americans.  Republicans know how Americans think, which is why they play to our weakest points.  We are very easily frightened and our eyes glaze over when confronted with complexity.

    Republicans hold sway because they know that Americans are uninformed, short-sighted, selfish and lack even the most rudimentary ability to delay gratification.  Democrats lose because we don't know how to communicate with such people...

    No politician ever lost an election by underestimating the intelligence of the American public. PT Barnum, paraphrased...

    by jarhead5536 on Thu Nov 04, 2010 at 02:11:05 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site