Skip to main content

So the infamous Catfood Commission, lead by so-called deficit czars Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles released the chairman’s mark of the proposed outlines to restore fiscal sanity to this country.

Of course, to the surprise of no one outside of the Beltway, their "tough, painful" choices are only so to working Americans, senior citizens, and anyone else who isn’t already rich and powerful.

Among the underpants gnome-like proposals to find "Profit!", are things like making people work longer before they can retire, slashing benefits to important social safety net programs, cutting the everloving shit out of government programs and Cabinet departments, slashing hundreds of thousands if not millions of jobs within the federal government, and a ludicrous attempt to cap the spending of the government at 21% of GDP.

Oh yeah, according to some smart people, the proposal is essentially 75% slash-and-burn, while only 25% revenue raising.

In addition, according to your political God and mine, Keith Olbermann, the rich would see their tax rates go down all the way to 23%.

A handful of commission members yesterday reported being "blindsided" by the issuance of this draft. David Axelrod of the White House apparently only knew of its release mere minutes before it was to happen. Jan Schakowsky and Dick Durbin strongly suggested there was no way they could support it. Schakowsky says she would be "virulently opposed" to the cuts in Social Security. Nancy Pelosi called the proposal literally "unacceptable". Even retiring Republican Judd Gregg pointed out that parts of the proposal "disturbed" him.

Now I’m not one to believe that Gregg is as disturbed as the Democrats are, or about the same things Democrats are, but the fact that at least one Republican was able to come out and not immediately jump on the bandwagon of supporting this thing is probably a positive sign. Maybe.

At least, it would be if we didn’t have President Obama telling people to stop shooting the proposal full of holes already. Seriously.

"Before anybody starts shooting down proposals, I think we need to listen, we need to gather up all the facts," Obama told reporters.

He added: "If people are, in fact, concerned about spending, debt, deficits and the future of our country, then they're going to need to be armed with the information about the kinds of choices that are going to be involved, and we can't just engage in political rhetoric."

So standing up for the rights and benefits of millions of senior citizens is "political rhetoric", Mr. President? Fighting to keep people in their supposed golden years out of poverty is "political rhetoric", Mr. President?

Hell, if that’s what Obama thinks is political rhetoric, I’d hate to see what he thinks of real political rhetoric.

Obama said he will await the commission's Dec. 1 formal report before commenting in detail. Members "are trying to round up 14 votes for certain aspects of the recommendations, and I want to make sure that they've got the room and the space to do so," he said.

Translation: Please bow down to the almighty Catfood Commission which I hand-picked to give the farm away to conservatives by destroying popular social programs.

Seriously, Mr. President. How much fuller of a comment would you need to make to make your aims even clearer? If you really wanted to let the commission do whatever work you set them out to do on their own, you would not make a single comment...really, ever.

Instead, your decision to speak out right now shows that you are playing your hand further away from the vest than you probably should be.

Why else would you be telling people to not pooh-pooh every idea in the commission’s draft report already unless you wanted to see them succeed? Why else would you be telling people to shut up and sit down and let them men find 14 people willing to band together in an unholy union to destroy some of the best programs the federal government has to offer?

Unless, of course, that’s exactly what you want.

Mr. President, I have come to believe that your speeches about Social Security "being there for people" or what have you might have just been some good-old fashioned political rhetoric.

Funny how you use it when it suits your needs to pull the wool over our eyes, but decry it when it is spoken contra to the things you appear to desire.

Heckuva Job, Mr. President.

Originally posted to Progress in the 757 on Thu Nov 11, 2010 at 05:42 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site