Skip to main content

Our FICA Taxes were meant to be KEPT separate from our National Budget and National Debt.

They WERE intended to pay for our retirement security -- BY LAW;

and NOT intended to be lumped in with the Govt's Operating Budget:

[...] some people refer to the bonds in the Social Security Trust Fund as "worthless IOU's." This characterization is inaccurate. The bonds in the Trust Fund are as real as any U.S. Savings Bond that you might happen to own. The Social Security program loaned this money to the federal government and has a legal right to receive it back with interest.[29]

This can be a difficult concept to grasp, because it doesn't make sense that the federal government owes money to a federal program like Social Security. The key to keeping this straight in your head is to be aware of the following facts:

  1. The Social Security program levies its own taxes.[30]
  1. The finances of the Social Security program are separated by law from the rest of the federal government.[31]

Social Security is NOT the Problem ...

So what is?

Link to intro quote: The Impact of Social Security on the National Debt By James D. Agresti and the Staff of Just Facts -- Sep 1, 2001

Social Security is NOT the cause of the National Debt -- the Govt  MAXING OUT all its Credit Cards is.

Social Security not a cause of, and not a solution to, national debt
by Jay Bookman -- Sep 7, 2010

It’s not, or at least it shouldn’t be, about Social Security.

Social Security is neither the cause of nor the solution to our nation’s financial problems.

The facts are as follows:

  1. With no changes in taxes or benefits, Social Security can continue to pay 100 percent of all promised benefits between now and 2036. It can do so by tapping a $2.5 trillion trust fund created precisely to cover the retirement years of the Baby Boom generation.
  1. Beginning in 2037, and for every year thereafter, Social Security would be able to pay recipients only 76 percent of promised benefits.
  1. That post-2037 gap could be closed with relatively minor fixes. For example, raising combined SSI payroll taxes from 12.4 to 14.4 percent would cover the bill entirely. A combination of a slight payroll tax increase, applying the tax to earned income above the current tax ceiling of $106,000 and adjusting scheduled cost-of-living increases could also eliminate the gap relatively painlessly.

Social Security is NOT the Problem ...

So what is?

Our inability to Pay as we Go.

Our inability to Raise Taxes to Pay as we Go.

Our inability to let the Unpaid for, Irresponsible Bush Tax Cuts, expire, as required BY LAW.


It's time to stop blaming the Social Security Trust Fund -- for being SO Successful and for floating Govt a Loan -- to fight its endless wars.

It's Time for American Taxpayers, especially the upper income variety, to start Paying the Piper.  It's time to stop living on "borrowed time."  It's time to Pony up, and make good on our Debts.  Those Debts W. left us.

Our FICA Taxes, that every worker pays, are Earmarked.

They are Earmarked to OUR OWN Retirements!

They were never intended to pay for Defense, to pay for Schools, to pay for Roads.

Our FICA Taxes were meant to be separate from our National Budget and National Debt.

They WERE intended to pay for our retirement dignity -- BY LAW!

They are NOT supposed to be lumped in with the Govt's Operating Budget.

The Federal Govt needs to stop squelching on its long term obligations -- by screwing the Lenders of Last Resort --

US !

Social Security is NOT the Problem ...

Our petrifying phobia of Tax Increases, is THE Problem.

Originally posted to Digging up those Facts ... for over 8 years. on Thu Nov 11, 2010 at 04:21 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site