Skip to main content

By Hina Shamsi, Director, ACLU National Security Project

"A unique and extraordinary case" is how a federal judge described our lawsuit, with the Center for Constitutional Rights, challenging the Obama administration's targeted killing policy.

We brought the case on behalf of Nasser Al-Aulaqi, whose U.S. citizen son, Anwar Al-Aulaqi, has been put on a secret hit list by the government. In a decision issued today, the judge emphasized that the case raises critically important questions, including whether "the Executive [can] order the assassination of a U.S. citizen without first affording him any form of judicial process whatsoever, based on the mere assertion that he is a dangerous member of a terrorist organization."  The court nevertheless dismissed the case on the basis of "standing" — ruling that our client does not have the right to represent the interests of his son — and on the grounds that the case raises "political questions" that are not subject to judicial review.  He did not rule on the merits of the case.

The ramifications of the court's decision are breathtaking.

A central premise of the case is that in our constitutional system of checks and balances, courts have a critical oversight role to play when the executive branch claims the authority — as both the Bush and Obama administrations have done — to kill people far from any battlefield, based on secret criteria. In rejecting that premise, the court has effectively granted the president the unreviewable authority to order the targeted killing of any American, anywhere, based on a unilateral determination that the person is a threat. No president should have that power. But the court's decision today would grant that authority in all future cases, to all future presidents. (And with America's example to follow, will other countries be far behind?)

While the president's claims of unilateral authority to conduct targeted killing are extraordinary, the relief we sought is not. We did not ask the court to rule that targeted killings are per se illegal, nor did we ask the judge to second-guess battlefield decisions. We acknowledged that there are exceptional circumstances — as a last resort, when a threat is imminent and there is no reasonable alternative — in which the government can legally use lethal force without prior judicial process. But because the government has turned these exceptional circumstances into policy with its targeted killing program, we asked the court to order that outside the context of armed conflict, the government can carry out the targeted killing of an American citizen only as a last resort to address an imminent threat to life or physical safety.

We also asked that the courts determine — after the fact — whether the government is actually complying with that standard. Otherwise, the government's targeted killing program amounts to the imposition of a death sentence against a mere suspect, without charge, trial or any other independent check against mistakes. Unfortunately, after today's decision, that is what we're left with. It is hard to imagine a decision more damaging to American citizens' liberty and the rule of law.

Originally posted to ACLU on Tue Dec 07, 2010 at 02:10 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Tookish, Joe Bob, Garrett, Marek, raatz, Marie, Liberal Thinking, SaveDemocracy, mickT, mattman, janinsanfran, PeterHug, tnichlsn, musicalhair, Shockwave, Emocrat, Goobergunch, LuvSet, eeff, osterizer, LeftHandedMan, WI Deadhead, silence, TheMomCat, whenwego, weirdscenes, boadicea, PBnJ, phillies, farmerhunt, chimpy, greenomanic, larryrant, Fe, Nate Roberts, ctsteve, hangingchad, danthrax, CitizenOfEarth, ranger995, gmb, RaulVB, alivingston, Viola Lee, dwahzon, under the bodhi tree, frostieb, AllisonInSeattle, KateCrashes, vacantlook, Daddy Bartholomew, eztempo, JHen, My Philosophy, joanneleon, tovan, Bluesee, marina, Jagger, m16eib, Independent Musings, corvo, panicbean, Simplify, truong son traveler, YucatanMan, Laurence Lewis, Penman, teknofyl, SJerseyIndy, most peculiar mama, Eric K, LucyandByron, power model, Shotput8, neroden, Reepicheep, Cory Bantic, peacestpete, Snud, skywriter, SoulCatcher, Sanuk, Keone Michaels, Kingsmeg, tobendaro, Russgirl, martyc35, KenBee, Magnifico, arlene, Son of a Cat, triv33, Tanya, JVolvo, Sagebrush Bob, sceptical observer, mhw, Akire, MBNYC, Helpless, profh, Lovo, goinsouth, zedaker, shaharazade, PoxOnYou, Temmoku, a a, Nulwee, bigchin, One Pissed Off Liberal, old wobbly, out of left field, bluicebank, mochajava13, asilomar, khereva, milkbone, Foxwizard, FishOutofWater, yowsta, david mizner, Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle, lastxwriter, Strabo, artisan, jayden, Uberbah, jnhobbs, millwood, pioneer111, uciguy30, Got a Grip, LWelsch, JML9999, rogerdaddy, Clio2, damascusdem, dadadata, wade norris, TH Seed, Seamus D, petulans, luckylizard, BYw, allie123, Robobagpiper, rhutcheson, watercarrier4diogenes, papicek, Reframing the Debate, Leo in NJ, squarewheel, ZhenRen, KingCranky, driftwood, Rick Aucoin, Scott Wooledge, An Affirming Flame, Partisan Progressive, GBCW, JesseCW, dRefractor, asym, Keith Pickering, sfarkash, Knarfc, Enzo Valenzetti, ratmach, catilinus, parallaxblue, notcaesar, p gorden lippy, roadbear, Anak, NY brit expat, Lady Libertine, 2020adam, albrt, JRandomPoster, Funkygal, washunate, roystah, cocinero, Oh Mary Oh, NC Blue, al ajnabee, Colorado is the Shiznit, targetdemographic, heart of a quince, SuperBowlXX, nicethugbert, AuroraDawn, sixthestate, BlueJessamine, Situational Lefty, Aranfell, trumpeter, Kcox, bobsc, Element 61, enhydra lutris, beforedawn, Nightshade Q, jobobo, mrbond, Tentwenty, Flying Goat, turn blue, Miep, just want to comment, Ultranaut, drnononono, geraldlaslo, supercereal, radical simplicity, Laiane

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site