Skip to main content

A couple of days ago I said that President Obama said that the people failed to convince the Republicans to back down on their tax cut demands. I was misinformed. He said no such thing, at least not at the Tuesday press conference. I relied on a third hand report. I was wrong.

Unfortunately, I finally did watch the press conference. And this is my analysis of what happened.

As I said before, there are five tools in politics - morality, knowledge, public support, money, and fear.
President Obama appealed to morality repeatedly in the conference. It was, however, a weak appeal, as he admitted every time that he was doing the wrong thing (giving in to the rich) because he was threatened with a greater evil. He was even asked how he could be trusted to stand up against the Republicans the next time. In the next paragraphs I will explain how his answer was inadeequate.
He lost the tool of knowledge. As has been pointed out, in two years the unemployment extension will have expired and the tax cuts for both the middle class and the rich will be expiring. Therefore, the same hostage situation will occur, except that it will be an election year for him, not just other Democrats; in simpler terms, the Republican position will be stronger, not weaker. And everyone knows it. By denying that obvious fact the President has not only lost on knowledge, he has also undercut his claim to morality.
The President said several times that the people were on his side; but then he did not do what the people wanted. He lost on public support. True, the public's stance against the Republicans was likely unreliable, as it might well change when real people start losing their homes, but that is to lose faith in public support, and it is not a tool if you don't use it.
I've said that the President lost his claim to knowledge by making what can most politely be called a pollyanish claim that his position would be stronger in two years rather than weaker. This statement also fails in regard to the tool of money. Simply, the rich will take more money to use against us than we will get to survive with. In no more than a year this deal will do more harm than good. Economically, socially, and politically. This is a certainty. The President says that his bargaining position will improve, since the unemployment rate will go down. Refer again to knowledge - President Obama actually said that this deal will create jobs. This defies 30 years of hard facts. The Republicans' primary tool is money; giving them more is foolhardy.
The last tool is fear. President Obama said repeatedly that he made the deal because he was afraid of the consequences. In fairness he also said that congress should have fought on the issue before the election - and he was right. Fear won, but not by terrorizing the people; by terrorizing the President.

Uh... as I write this Thom Hartmann is reporting that the Democrats in Congress have refused to go along with the deal. If so, this is a double victory - The President takes the moral argument, and the Democrats as a party take the credit for standing up and doing the right thing, which is also what the people want. The Republicans will either back down or they will be exposed.
This changes everything. If the economy improves, the Democrats will get the credit for standing up, and if the economy fails then the Republican obstructionism will take the blame.

Originally posted to doh1304 on Thu Dec 09, 2010 at 09:39 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  A couple more tools (0+ / 0-)

    Thanks for the correction.

    I like your test of tools, but working politicians have at least two more and probably many more:
       positional power
       access to the means of communication

    These two tools are at the heart of the ability to persuade, which in even the most corrupt, authoritarian regime is required...well, we should know.

    •  I'm a lttle bit academic (0+ / 0-)

      Access comes from money or incumbency, or being an acknowledged spokesman. I put that under money or public support. You are right in practice; I'm just suggesting that we do the practical better by being aware of the theoretical.

  •  A minor quibble... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wader, FG, FiredUpInCA

    No, actually, it's a major one:

    "if the economy fails then the Republican obstructionism will take the blame"

    Sorry, but when have Republicans ever been blamed for their obstructionism?  Certainly weren't blamed in the 2010 midterms!  If the legislation dies and the economy does not improve, the Dems and Obama will be blamed.  Regardless of who is at fault.

    {This Space Intentionally Left Blank}

    by DaveV on Thu Dec 09, 2010 at 09:59:30 AM PST

    •  If that's right we're doomed. (0+ / 0-)

      Republicans win by using money to buy media access to spread lies. This only works as long as enough people believe. If the economy fails then either people will stop going along with the lies or not. With their control of the media it is hard to expose them, but eventually hard facts will, or nothing will.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site