Skip to main content

Apart from one post regarding the false equivalence evident in the commentary of the Tucson shootings, I've thought hard about the political climate, and my (hopefully) minuscule contribution to its tone.

And I can't escape the conclusion that, even as I decried the violent rhetoric of the right, I helped contribute to the incivility. Even in that post, where I twice tried to make the case that what the right was doing equated to terrorist rhetoric.

Not that my point was entirely off base.

Violence generated through a desire to gain political power and/or effect policy is terrorism, by definition and I was right about that. However, it's not that simple.

Sarah Palin's troubles in all this began the moment someone remembered that her campaign had place crosshairs over Gabrielle Giffords' district, and she can't walk that one back. Does this mean that she intended Loughner? No. Does it mean that she, and the right wing crazies on Fox and talk radio are to blame for what happened? Perhaps. Loughner seems, at this point, to have suffered from an obsession with "government control" and to the extent that the right fed his delusions and linked it to the second amendment, and to the extent that enabled Loughner to arm himself as he did, they are culpable.

But that's a mild blame, and by far the smaller of their two major sins.

"I May Not Be A Rocket Scientist, But I Play One On TV"

Where the right really goes off the rails is in their willingness to make whatever shit up they want. And they do this constantly. (Note the present tense in that sentence. More on that later.) Is the left happy that these shootings occurred, as Rush Limbaugh claims? He has the gall to claim that I'm happy that six people are dead, including a nine year old girl. That's an outrageous lie wildly inaccurate. In Glenn Beck's twisted logic, I'm the threat to the republic, but not that man or woman willing to engage in gunplay for political purposes.

Keith Olbermann went on to list more examples of these. The right has been busy both trying to claim that they're as much a victim as those in Tucson, while trying to pin the blame on the left. Nobody who already doesn't want to be fooled is, however, and it's abundantly clear to all which side has been playing with fire.

However, I don't believe Sarah Palin desired what happened in Tucson. I don't believe that was ever her aim goal, nor do I feel she is happy at the prospect of a possible armed uprising. Giving the matter the least bit of honest reflection leads one to the conclusion that even the most politically obtuse operative in her camp would consider Jared Lee Loughner nothing but a PR disaster. Witness the speed with which that crosshairs map disappeared from her site. Another over-the-top position coming from Sarah Palin, she's the victim, and that the republic "will be destroyed" if she isn't taken seriously.

Evidently, America's future all depends on Sarah Palin.

To my mind, the propensity of the right to flat out lie to the public, to just go ahead and make up whatever talking points they want is the far greater error of the right. Not only on policy or in political "debate," but in the fact that this sends the signal that another limit has been removed: the limit of truth, the restraint of dealing with facts and reality. Politics is an emotional undertaking which operates on imprecise symbol and on gut reaction, and when reliance on hard information and true fact is abandoned, any act becomes implicitly enabled. This is, to my mind, the first and best reason why religion should be, must be, left out of politics. In God's name, any atrocity becomes permissible, and history bears this out again and again (here, here and here, some examples off the top of my head).

We still see the GOP doing this. Eric Cantor's claim that democrats are in control of the government is just as much a lie as Limbaugh's and Beck's. The truth is, neither side controls the federal government at this point. This is nothing more than political spin, an attempt to duck some of the responsibility for the coming debt ceiling vote.

Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, John Boehner and other shock jocks and bloggers of the right have yet to even acknowledge any error.

On the left, even here, we're guilty of mischaracterizations. I called them terrorists, for instance, and this was wrong as well. Someone here should have called me out on this. Where the right goes over the line is that they have championed Second Amendment rights and gone out of their way, for political benefit, to foster paranoia among gun owners.

The paranoia was unwarranted. There was no talk of gun control measures until Tucson. Let's be clear on this, left and right. Events have brought the issue back to the fore even though employment, the deficit, the economy, health care and two wars still preoccupy thousands of families in America. Rachel has made it abundantly clear that these kinds of shootings are far from extraordinary. I get the impression from her that they occur every few months somewhere in America, but there was silence on this in all quarters.

The left didn't put gun control back on the table. Jared Loughner did.

The right, saving John McCain, hasn't made the mea culpa statement which we've seen from those on the left, and perhaps it is because they feel, like Sarah Palin evidently does, that they don't have the political space to do so. That's just my guess. Pure speculation on my part. Palin was unlucky that the person she targeted with that crosshair turned out to be a victim, and it is revealing of her fitness for office (any office) that she has chosen to try to paint herself as a victim here (I wish I had her bank account) rather than admit her responsibility, however indirect.

I'm not a victim of the Tucson shooting. I may have helped cause it, though, and I resolve not to do so again. I have always, and will continue, to reserve and restrict my right of protest to political speech and my vote.

In Europe, I'd be a Social Democrat. Here in America, I'm just a red-socialist-lefty. I believe in democracy and in economic and social justice. I believe know that government has a role to play in shaping American society—I've seen it work with my own eyes. I think that free markets need to behave like markets and not mobs of cutthroats. I know that we can do this without violating "the spirit of the founders," because they gave us permission to do just that. It says so in the constitution. I'll argue the facts, as best I know them, because they support my positions.

Even as we see, today, republicans utter new untruths in the health care repeal debate. I won't call them terrorists, even though repeal puts thousands of lives at risk, but what they're doing is pretty bad.

They're lying to voters and they know it. They should stop, though I agree they may be trapped by their own rhetoric and their blatant pandering.

Originally posted to PROCÈS-VERBAL on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 06:04 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  BREAKING... (5+ / 0-)

    Rachel Maddow now reports that a bomb was placed on an MLK day parade route in Spokane Washington.

    Are things getting better?

    22 December 2010: Democrats have one good day in two years, and what will it cost us?

    by papicek on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 06:03:52 PM PST

    •  I don't necessarily believe that has anything to (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Dallasdoc, papicek

      do with the tone of politics. There are white supremist groups in this country, and what more perfect time/place to make yourself known than on  MLK day and a parade honoring the man.

      I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson

      by Lucy2009 on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 06:14:14 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  I'm not getting that... (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Dallasdoc, I love OCD, Lucy2009

        but perhaps it's just me. I see racists under the GOP umbrella, right along with over-stimulated gun owners.

        I offered the "breaking" comment (my very first "breaking" I think. I'm very proud :) just because it came up as I went to press here, and the notion of violent objection to gun ownership has parallels with the violent opposition to Black empowerment, equality and mainstream inclusion.

        It may not be mainstream GOP ideology, but the recent history of pandering to the racist bloc by the GOP is well known.

        22 December 2010: Democrats have one good day in two years, and what will it cost us?

        by papicek on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 06:22:19 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  I appreciate your sincerity. (6+ / 0-)

    But,honestly,I am not willing to run away from calling out those who engage in terrorism,terrorists. Now,do I think Palin,Beck et al were responsible for the shooting in Tucson? No.But do I think RW radio and bullyboy agitators made our meet & greet with our local representative during the HC debate an occasion full of terror? Yes. Because little old ladies reduced to tears,leaving before they could speak and being afraid to ever go to another political event ever,is terrorism.

    "George RR Martin is not your bitch" ~~ Neil Gaiman

    by tardis10 on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 06:16:51 PM PST

    •  point well taken... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Dallasdoc, tardis10

      and as you explain it, this has its proper perspective. I'm not certain that I did that. I thought I had, but I can't be in the minds of everyone who'll read what I write.

      I'm inclined to be cautious at this point. I'd hate to try and live with myself after learning that someone committed some atrocity after having read something I wrote, and based his action on agreement with me.

      As I said before, that's a "teaching moment" I think we should all try and avoid.

      22 December 2010: Democrats have one good day in two years, and what will it cost us?

      by papicek on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 06:30:14 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Sarah Palin and her ilk will never see how they (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Dallasdoc, papicek

    have any rsponsibility in much of anything. Their whole personality is wrapped-up in being victims, in calling out EVERYTHING that liberals do (good/bad or indifferent), in inciting anger/fear/violence in the public at large. Their purpose is not to "educate", nor to promote true grassroots activism.

    I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson

    by Lucy2009 on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 06:52:39 PM PST

    •  if today's GOP remarks tell us anything... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Dallasdoc, Lucy2009

      than the entire GOP is locked into lying. Cantor on who "runs" Washington, the claims made today on the floor of the House in the health care repeal debate seem to indicate that the lying to voters will continue.

      I begin to agree with those who say Palin is really someone who think she's a defiant victim and true, fighting American.

      Eh.

      I'm wondering when she gets ignored like she so richly deserves.

      22 December 2010: Democrats have one good day in two years, and what will it cost us?

      by papicek on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 07:03:45 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  A fable (4+ / 0-)

    The Scorpion and the Frog is worth pondering.  Its denouement:

    So the frog agreed to take the scorpion across the river. He swam over to the bank and settled himself near the mud to pick up his passenger. The scorpion crawled onto the frog's back, his sharp claws prickling into the frog's soft hide, and the frog slid into the river. The muddy water swirled around them, but the frog stayed near the surface so the scorpion would not drown. He kicked strongly through the first half of the stream, his flippers paddling wildly against the current.

    Halfway across the river, the frog suddenly felt a sharp sting in his back and, out of the corner of his eye, saw the scorpion remove his stinger from the frog's back. A deadening numbness began to creep into his limbs.

    "You fool!" croaked the frog, "Now we shall both die! Why on earth did you do that?"

    The scorpion shrugged, and did a little jig on the drownings frog's back.

    "I could not help myself. It is my nature."

    Then they both sank into the muddy waters of the swiftly flowing river.

    Anybody who expects right-wing extremists to be anything other than violent, deluded narcissists is fated to disappointment.  Just like anybody who expects a politician to live up to his or her promises, it seems.

    Which is the greater lie?  Insisting that your violent rhetoric had nothing whatsoever to do with violent political acts by crazy people, or promising hope and change while intending to deliver none at all?  Does it even matter?

    Scorpions have to be put in glass containers when they approach us so nobody gets hurt.  We have to learn how to bottle our politicians, and not let them deliver their inevitable sting.

    •  I'm thinking here in this diary... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Dallasdoc

      of the right's media figures more than the unknown silent Loughners of the world. I'm willing, at this point, to give them the benefit of the doubt because I've always assumed that the Palins, Limbaughs, Becks, the NRA and the Chamber say what they do out of political and pecuniary motives: appealing to the insane because it pays.

      My patience won't last out the month. That's plenty of time for them to clean up their act, even if they refuse to admit any responsibility for the violence, and Byron Williams is more my model than Loughner. He links himself to Beck by his own admission. I don't think they'll do so. Neither have many of them the intellect to see a way out past this nor the heart to be anything but scorpions for political gain.

      But I could be wrong, and I'm willing to give them the space and a limited amount of time to do the right thing.

      I should have made that clearer in the diary though.

      22 December 2010: Democrats have one good day in two years, and what will it cost us?

      by papicek on Tue Jan 18, 2011 at 08:08:19 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  apparently it's okay to say things that only (3+ / 0-)

      an insane person would take literally & then be surprised when an insane person takes them literally.

      Whatever action a great man performs, common men follow. And whatever standards he sets by exemplary acts, all the world pursues. The Gita 3.21

      by rasbobbo on Wed Jan 19, 2011 at 12:14:08 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site