Skip to main content

While the White House and the FCC sold us out on net neutrality, yesterday produced an important victory in the fight for an open Internet.  Congressman Bobby Rush, who should have been a shoe-in for a subcommittee position with authority over the Internet, was denied the position after nearly 16,000 ColorOfChange members opposed his candidacy.  Internet champion Anna Eshoo was selected by her peers instead.

Eshoo's victory comes on the heels of a nearly 2-month campaign by More than 16,000 ColorOfChange members signed a petition to Congresswoman Pelosi asking Democratic leaders to oppose Rush's candidacy for the position, and more than 800 placed phone calls to Pelosi's office. Another 450 called Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Henry Waxman in the last few critical days of the campaign.

Make no mistake -- without the push on the part of everyday people to oppose his candidacy, Rush would easily have been selected to lead Democrats on the telecom panel. Votes for committee leadership are typically ceremonial displays; tradition dictates that the member with the greatest seniority will win the position unless that member holds another committee leadership position elsewhere. And Rush had greater seniority than his rival for the position, Rep. Anna Eshoo.

Moreover, many observers questioned whether Democratic leaders would be willing to risk tensions with the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) by defying the seniority system in order to deny a prominent Black Congressman his first leadership choice. This sense was strengthened after Rush won the explicit support of both CBC leadership and some in the civil rights establishment.

In the end, though, the voices of everyday people prevailed.  We opposed Rush's candidacy because:

  • In 2006, Rush voted against Rep. Edward Markey’s amendment to the COPE Act, which would have enshrined the FCC’s net neutrality principles into law.  In stating his opposition, Rush infamously described net neutrality as “a solution in search of a problem.”
  • In 2010 the Congressman signed a letter circulated by Rep. Gene Green (D-TX) that assailed net neutrality, focusing on the FCC’s efforts to reclassify broadband Internet.  Green’s effort, which netted the support of 74 Democrats, helped discourage the FCC from pursuing more stringent net neutrality rules.

Rush’s close relationships with the telecommunications industry were another cause for concern.  According to the Center for Responsive Politics, AT&T is Rush’s second-largest single contributor over his career.  Also among his top 10 lifetime contributors are the National Cable and Telecommunications Association (#8) and Verizon (#10).  In addition, SBC (later purchased by AT&T) made a 3-year, $1 million grant to a Chicago community center bearing Rush’s name in 2001.

At the end of the day, ColorOfChange members succeeded in holding Rush accountable for his record on net neutrality.  In doing so, they made a powerful statement: no matter who you are, you can be held accountable.  That's why this isn't just a big win for net neutrality advocates -- it's a big win for anyone who believes that government should be responsive to and accountable to its citizens' interests above corporate interests.  

Originally posted to ColorOfChange on Thu Jan 20, 2011 at 01:51 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site