Skip to main content

So often, when religious leftists object to criticisms of religion as inherently conservative, we hear in response, so why aren't you doing anything?  Which is odd to our ears because we've been doing things for a long time, in organizations such as the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, the National Religious Campaign Against Torture, or the Interfaith Alliance.  It seems we do our thing, say what we need to say, and our action is dismissed as statistically insignificant at best, or enabling at worst.

Although I published this diary a year ago, the situation hasn't really budged, so I'm reposting.

While reading Elizabeth Eisenstein's The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, it hit me that part of the reason for the invisibility of the religious left is that we never "got" television.  One of the points in Eisenstein's book is that the Protestant Reformation was successful because Protestants understood print, while Catholics did not.  Similarly, conservative Christians in the 70s and 80s used television very effectively, while liberal religious groups poo-pooed it, a trend discussed a bit in Building a Protestant Left: Christianity and Crisis Magazine, 1941-1993.  This, I believe, was a serious strategic error.

However, another problem is that reporters seem to have very fixed frames, or more bluntly, stubborn preconceptions, about what is at stake in the dynamics of religious politics.  Two articles show very clearly how religious liberals try to communicate with the media, only to have what they have to say erased in favor of simplistic narratives of a battle between the Religious Right and Secular Liberalism.

The first essay, by Mark Jordan, 'Traditional'Christianity vs. 'Liberals'? It's Not That Simple, states,

Most reporting of religious debates over sexuality, whether in the Times or on the wire services, assumes the same division...  When self-proclaimed "traditional" voices are quoted against same-sex marriage, they are allowed to claim scriptural evidence, church history, and even the name "Christian." When other Christian clergy or believers are quoted in support of same-sex marriage, they become "activists" who are allowed only to speak about civil rights or fairness or—sometimes—wispy Christian principles, but not about scripture or church history or faith itself.

I used to think that this was the fault of progressives—that we reverted too often to the bland language of fairness, toleration, or rights. So I tried always to give reporters scriptural and historical arguments. They rarely found their way into print...  So I began to experiment with saying very traditional religious things in interviews.

"I support ordaining openly lesbian and gay candidates because that’s where I’m led when I study scripture and pray."

"My belief in incarnation pushes me toward the blessing of same-sex unions."

The reaction was mostly awkward silence. I could hear the typing stop at the other end of the line.

Rosemary Radford Ruether described the same dynamic fifteen years ago, in her discussion of what it means for her to be a religious socialist feminist, Bridging the Gap:

The assumption that religion is normatively conservative is not confined to the secular left; it pervades the American secular media. I am on the list of people whom journalists regularly call for background information on religious issues. Their typical line of questioning demonstrates both their ignorance of religion and their operating assumption that conservative religion is "normative" religion. Because I am a religious feminist, they assume I am on the "fringe" and sometimes they try to entrap me into making some "fringe" remark -- like "God is female." When I try to explain that God is not a corporeal being of any kind and thus does not have gender, male or female, they are confused or impatient. This is not what they want to hear.

One especially unpleasant experience with such entrapment came from a major news magazine proposing a story on women in theological seminaries. The editor said he was sending a photographer to take pictures of me and the seminary for a cover story. Both a photographer and a woman journalist did show up. But after the journalist attended a number of classes and sat in on women's groups on campus, I heard nothing more.

Eventually the journalist told me that the story had been dropped. She explained with embarrassment that the editor had gotten the impression that Christian theological seminaries had become bastions of "militant lesbians" who were driving the men out of the schools. He thought this would be a hot story. When it became clear that this was not the case, the editor lost interest.

So, a huge task for religious liberals, and for secular folk who may be sympathetic with religious liberalism, in this day and age is to make a point to call media outlets out on their biases when we see them.  I had a letter published in The American Prospect in 2003, when I caught the dynamic at work.  What was interesting about that instance was that I made very clear to include examples from non-Christian religious activism to make my point.  All the non-Christian examples were dropped in the version The American Prospect published.  I was able to intervene in my small way to slow the perpetuation of a narrative that religous/secular maps directly onto conservative/liberal.  In the same stroke, my attempt to bring to the general consciousness that religion is more than Christianity was silenced.  We do what we can, and if it doesn't work, we take up the task again another day.

Update: See Philoguy's response.

Originally posted to dirkster42 on Fri Feb 11, 2011 at 08:32 AM PST.

Poll

Bringing Religious Left Activism to the Light of Day will

4%25 votes
62%373 votes
14%85 votes
19%114 votes

| 597 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

a gilas girl, PeWi, Renee, JekyllnHyde, davej, Sylv, nolalily, Odysseus, teacherken, tikkun, musing85, flatiron, TrueBlueMajority, janinsanfran, Emerson, karlpk, Shockwave, LynChi, Andrew C White, LuvSet, polecat, chicagochristianleft, RFK Lives, gjohnsit, marge, niemann, karenc13, mbayrob, DaleA, CoolOnion, mkfarkus, Frederick Clarkson, Ignacio Magaloni, Rujax206, Boston to Salem, sngmama, fumie, Beelzebud, antirove, Chrisfs, nuttymango, aitchdee, wader, tomephil, danthrax, missliberties, pat bunny, BoxerDave, johanus, Guinho, Hawksana, Kidspeak, texasmom, BMarshall, dwahzon, 42, Chirons apprentice, Catte Nappe, cevad, FlyingToaster, econlibVA, djtyg, mungley, Lefty Mama, SadieB, lyvwyr101, sebastianguy99, la motocycliste, G2geek, ExStr8, jabney, Bluesee, radarlady, deepfish, Philoguy, Alice Venturi, eru, jimstaro, Inland, algebrateacher, mph2005, SocioSam, Reality Bites Back, Philpm, martini, Shirl In Idaho, chicagoblueohio, irishwitch, tarheelblue, highfive, Pinko Elephant, BlueInARedState, Themistoclea, dopper0189, dougymi, fiddler crabby, fou, kck, blueoasis, megisi, bubbanomics, gooderservice, Preston S, doinaheckuvanutjob, Pilgrim X, Dreaming of Better Days, revgerry, ipsos, louise the dog, slksfca, Pandoras Box, Tempus Figits, tegrat, sephius1, One Pissed Off Liberal, FoundingFatherDAR, anotherdemocrat, UU VIEW, gloriana, noofsh, DWG, sfbob, bnasley, Swill to Power, jayden, jedennis, millwood, jhop7, Sarea, journeyman, JML9999, ByTor, Predictor, TomP, gizmo59, JDWolverton, revm3up, mconvente, gzodik, elwior, brooklynbadboy, lineatus, jamess, weddedgay, Calamity Jean, mayim, MrJayTee, bluesheep, jarhead5536, get the red out, pelagicray, Blueslide, allie123, JamieG from Md, CupofTea, Simply Agrestic, jlms qkw, JBL55, prettygirlxoxoxo, Aaron Krager, Rhysling, Ripeness Is All, bushondrugs, snackdoodle, greengemini, Partisan Progressive, Tara the Antisocial Social Worker, Canadian Green Card Alien, Daily Activist, unspeakable, elziax, hyper, conlakappa, dalfireplug, RadioGirl, TDP, Dichro Gal, Wendy Slammo, foufou, trustno1, WhitRobinson, roadbear, gramofsam1, princss6, Ray Blake, appledown, gulfgal98, samanthab, pixxer, ricardomath, nickrud, abrauer, Muggsy, Floande, science nerd, TheHalfrican, Onomastic, StateofEuphoria, Fletcher Christensen, mateohussein, nicethugbert, sowsearsoup, Mr MadAsHell, freesia, cbyoung, Sand Hill Crane, kevin k, it really is that important, CoExistNow, AgavePup, Escamillo, dle2GA, Inspector Javert, dakinishir, tardis10, LSmith, CherryTheTart, PeggyD, MRA NY, Vtdblue, peregrine kate, yaque, mali muso, wide eyed lib, lincoln deschain, baquist, SteelerGrrl, Huginn and Muninn, Chitown Kev, Kurt from CMH, Nashville fan, lightshine, Only Needs a Beat, AZ Independent, Liberal Granny, FireBird1, We Won, foucaultspendulum, EclecticCrafter, martinjedlicka, mapamp, doroma, LiberalVol, brae70, JamesGG, ConfusedSkyes

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site