Skip to main content

Another Democrat, another effort being made to address marijuana prohibition as well as taking aim at the high cost of a failed policy..

I, of course, believe this is very smart politics as well as very stylish.

Congressman’s proposed budget cuts target the war on drugs

Colorado Congressman Jared Polis has offered two amendments to the House continuing resolution that would eliminate much of the federal funding for the war on drugs in the United States.

The House is currently debating HR 1, the Full Year Continuing Appropriations Act of 2011. The bill is needed to fund the government for the rest of the current fiscal year.

Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) has offered a number of amendments to the legislation. One of his amendments, No. 501, would eliminate funding for the Office of National Drug Control Policy, commonly known as the drug czar. Another amendment, No. 427, would prohibit funds being made available for the investigation or criminal prosecution of any person for the possession, manufacture or distribution of marijuana.

The Drug Czar, by the way

By law, the drug czar must oppose any attempt to legalize the use (in any form) of illicit drugs.[11] According to the "Office of National Drug Control Policy Reauthorization Act of 1998"[12] the director of the ONDCP
(12) shall ensure that no Federal funds appropriated to the Office of National Drug Control Policy shall be expended for any study or contract relating to the legalization (for a medical use or any other use) of a substance listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) and take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form) that-- 1. is listed in schedule I of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812); and 2. has not been approved for use for medical purposes by the Food and Drug Administration;
The entire job of the Drug Czar is to prevent reform of cannabis laws.

Cannabis is 'scheduled' in Schedule 1 via the Controlled Substances Act. Everybody - but the US Federal Government and a handful of naysayers - knows cannabis doesn't belong there. It's really there out of spite.

But despite all that expensive effort, cannabis reform gains momentum. Colorado has, in places, heavily decriminalized marijuana possession and these laws targeting the funding for enforcing marijuana laws are becoming more frequent.

It is now safer than ever for Democratic politicians to suggest that reform may be open for discussion. This is leadership on this issue. It will not come from a republican (other than Ron Paul or maybe Dana Rohrbacher). It really should come from Democrats.

You know... this 'particular demographic' is also a giant group of voters, nudge, nudge.. I may be silly, but I think Dems should maybe re-evaluate their historical timidity in at least mentioning reorm in a favorable tone.

Can't hurt.

Last week, Rep. Polis said that support for legalizing marijuana at the federal level was steadily increasing in Congress.

"I find that a lot of members of Congress privately agree that we need to change our drug policy, they’re just still too timid or scared to come public with it," he said.


In a nutshell.

This is why I say all that Democrats have to do on this issue is just talk about reform. Lots of people are starting to have legislation about reform, which means it's OK to talk positively about it. Obama is reportedly opposed to relegalization but he's all for the national discourse.

The more politicians speak positively the more the climate will begin to thaw.

And talking about it would be 'leadership'.

Originally posted to DKos Cannabis Law and Drug War Reform on Wed Feb 16, 2011 at 05:50 PM PST.

Also republished by Colorado COmmunity.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site