Skip to main content

Conservative media critic Howard Kurtz has gone after Anderson Cooper for allegedly taking sides in his reporting of the revolution in Egypt. Cooper said the Mubarak regime lied about a number of matters including assaults on journalists. Kurtz took issue with using the word "lies."

Dana Milbank, in an opinion piece, recently reported the obvious: the GOP will benefit in 2012 if the economy slips a little more. He made it clear the GOP leaders must know this and that their present economic plans could be designed to insure that they profit from continued hard times.

Liz Trotta of FOX joined in criticizing Anderson Cooper. She, like Kurtz, seems to think that objectivity consists in just reporting each side's talking points. Any effort to fact check and find out what is true breaches objectivity. Of course, who should look for any instructions on objectivity from FOX. A recent refugee from that Republican propaganda organ has said that the folks there often simply make up stuff.

This "he says-she  says" approach has become the standare for the mainstream media. It confers enormous benefits on whoever decides to make up facts and make outrageous claims. For example, we have heard people claiming the stimulus created zero jobs and even prtoduced negative job growth. The data from the Congressional Budget Office says that at a minimum, it saved and produced 3.3 million jobs.  Time and again, MSM reporters did not challenge such wild claims.

  The standard for objectivity in opinion pieces seems a little different.  A year ago Michael Gerson intruduced the "unthinkable" standard when attacking an obscure pundit who said that the Republicans did all they could to hold down the stumulus because they knew that they would have a rich harvest in 2010 if the stimulus did not bring back most lost jobs. Gerson said this was simply  "unthinkable" because no good American would make such calculations.

The simple fact is that this is exactly what happened. The stimulus was far less than it should have been and two Nobel Prize winners, Jos Stiglitz and Paul Krugman consistently noted this. Krugman, however, did not seem to reralize the Barack Obama and the Democratic Congressional leadership produced as much as they could.

Dana Milbank, writing about John Boehner's lack of concern over what his budget cuts will do to jobs, correctly noted that the proposed cuts will cost just short of a million jobs, when all is tallied. The proposed cuts will cause a shock to the economy that would slow, if not reverse, the recovery.

We can be sure that conservatives will take Milbank to task for stating the obvious--that Republican strategy must take this into account.

He covered his backside by adding that austerity and drastic cuts might create an
atmosphere for creating jobs sometime in the future. That may or may not be true. He should have said in the very distant future. No one has produced any hard data from scientific stuedies to prove this.

Ron Paul did introduce a theoretician from the Ludwig von Mise Institute whose ideology supports this claim. But there wass no hard data.

The other aspect of this communications question has to do with Democratic ineptitude
in respondint to the constant attacks from the Right. It reminds me of when my high school fielded a football team for the first time in 1948. It was so bad that it often had to resort to quick kicks on third down. The comparison between Democrat and Republican communications tactics might be my 1948 team at its worst vs. the Pittsburgh Steelers at their very best. There is no contest.

But Democratic ineptitude should be the subject of another diary in a week or so.

My next entry will be a reprint of something a close friend wrote. I will credit him and tell where it can be found. I might add a comment or two at the end.

 

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site