Skip to main content

By Michele Waslin

The role of local police in immigration enforcement continues to be a complex policy and legislative issue at both the state and federal level. State legislatures, for example, are contemplating bills designed to increase the role of local police in immigration enforcement while federal legislation targets cities with so-called “sanctuary policies.” And as programs like 287(g), Secure Communities and other federal/local partnerships continue to expand, local police are now more involved in identifying undocumented immigrants than ever before. Many law enforcement officers, however, find that enforcing federal immigration law may interfere with their ability to prevent crime and keep neighborhoods safe, so they have designed tailored local policies to ensure that they maintain the best possible relationship with their communities. In a new report by the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), local police speak out on the difficulties of enforcing immigration laws and talk about best practices for navigating immigration issues in the future.

In Police and Immigration: How Chiefs are Leading their Communities through the Challenge, (PERF) looks at several case studies (New Haven, CT; Prince William County, VA; Montgomery County, MD; Minneapolis, MN; and various law enforcement agencies in Phoenix, AZ) to show how police efforts to engage with immigrant communities makes cities safer.

Each of these cities works with ICE in one way or another to aid in immigration enforcement.  However, these cities have worked with local police on policies regarding the way police enforce federal immigration laws, i.e. when police officers can question arrestees about immigration status, when cops contact ICE, and how witnesses and victims of crime are treated.  While each of the policies is different, each one was developed over time with input from various stakeholders and was custom-made to serve the best interests of the local community.

However, federal, state, and local policymakers continue to impose policies and responsibilities on local police without getting their input.  In the interest of looking tough on illegal immigration, some policymakers continue to claim that these localities are giving “sanctuary” to unauthorized immigrants and to criminals, and seek to undermine all of the hard work and thought put into designing their community policing policies.

At the same time, ICE continues to expand the Secure Communities program, forcing local police to send fingerprints to DHS to be matched against immigration databases.  When there’s a hit, local jails are asked to hold those individuals that ICE is interested in, at the expense of local taxpayers.  While the police aren’t deputized agents making arrests for immigration violations, the effect on the community can be the same—immigrants fearful of reporting crimes to the police, endangering everyone.  DHS is not giving local police jurisdictions the ability to opt out of Secure Communities, even if the locality determines it is in its own best interest to do so.

PERF’s report offers many excellent recommendations for ensuring that federal agencies consult with state and local police as they craft immigration policies—not just impose something on them after the fact.  They also recommend ICE increase coordination with and responsiveness to local police agencies and be more engaged and active in explaining their policies and actions to local communities.  Furthermore, the role and authority of local police needs to be more clearly defined by the federal government.

As for the police, PERF recommends officers be prohibited from arresting or detaining persons just to investigate their immigration status.  Police must uphold Constitutional and civil rights, and protect crime victims and witnesses regardless of their immigration status.  Similar to their recommendations for ICE, local police must engage their communities in dialogue about their policies and programs, educate their communities about their authority and actions, and develop clear, written policies and procedures regarding the handling of unauthorized immigrants.

Enacting these recommendations would go a long way toward ensuring that police and policymakers are on the same page, and that the best interest of the entire community is front-and-center in the immigration debate.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Initially, this diary confused me about ICE (0+ / 0-)

    but I looked into the linked .pdf recommendations, and yes, these would closely match similar suggestions that I've seen made by immigration advocates in my area.

    One thing that some don't understand is that it's often unclear which governing entity is more prone to violating both immigration law, as well as immigrant rights: ICE, or local law enforcement agencies.

    The key here is not only to have these begin working under steadier guidelines, but moreover, with the input of those impacted by the measures and various Civil Rights leaders in general.

    The current state of things is incredibly variable and often, ICE and local law enforcement are somewhat in collusion. That's bad. And then also, when they're disjointed, that can equally lead to abuses. So it's a complex situation. It needs this sort of complex review.

    Tipped & Rec'd.

    "There are always two parties; the establishment and the movement." - Emerson

    by mahakali overdrive on Wed Mar 09, 2011 at 01:35:17 PM PST

  •  What they should do is (0+ / 0-)

    create a system that, whenever the police pull someone over or arrest someone for a crime, automatically checks immigration status. It would be similar to the databases that check up against outstanding warrants and past criminal records.

    •  unfortunately it's not that simple (0+ / 0-)

      there is no single database that contains the immigration status of every single person.  Immigration law is really complex, and immigration lawyers get paid a lot to determine status, and immigration judges make determinations about status and whether or not someone is deportable.  Secure Communities is a program that sends all fingerprints of people booked into jail to be matched against DHS immigration databases, but there are many flaws with that program.  And the DHS database cannot give the status of every single person.

  •  Obviously there are issues with civil rights (0+ / 0-)

    violations within both ICE and the local police.  One serious concern we have is that empowering local police to enforce immigration laws, or by activating Secure Communities, local police have the ability to racially profile or arrest people because they suspect they might be immigrants, just to get them into the jail so their fingerprints will be taken and sent to ICE.  When we tell ICE our concerns about local police and racial profiling, they respond that they do not have authority over the local police and can't do anything.  So they create this problem, but then can't do anything about it.  We think that, at the very least, local police need to receive more training about immigration and civil rights.  Also, local police and ICE need to be keeping better statistics about whom they arrest, for what crime, etc. so that any patterns of profiling or civil rights violations can be detected.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site