Skip to main content

My partner and I were talking over lunch about how the latest round of high-profile policy maneuvering just flat-out doesn't make any sense, regardless of your ideology. Who benefits from dismantling Social Security? Who benefits from slashing NWS and NOAA services, and not being ready for disasters when they inevitably occur? Who benefits from making the US default, possibly starting off a chain reaction of global economic crises?

Being rich doesn't make you immune to disaster--you can't pay a hurricane to go strike somewhere else instead. And when a nuclear plant fails, or the air is poisoned, or our food is unregulated and rife with incurable diseases, you can't get away from that. It's systemic, and as long as you live on this planet, your quality of life will be directly affected.

The only reasonable explanation we could come up with is that conservatives have become so caught up with what they're doing in the moment, and whom they're fighting, that they've lost track of what they actually want and what they're trying to accomplish. The last thirty years have seen Republicans and conservative groups engaged in a relentless push to the right, shifting their policy a bit, then redefining the conversation to adjust the perceived "center" right so the next shift won't seem like a big deal. Shift, adjust. Shift, adjust. Wash, rinse, repeat.

But now--really, to a large degree, ten years ago--you would think they had accomplished everything they really wanted. Under Bush, we had a fire sale of many of our public assets. We have continued fueling the flames of international conflict, building up powerful private contractors that receive countless billions from the government, and we have become so inextricably entangled in (needless) conflict that those contract dollars will continue to be a sure thing for years to come. Regulations of all kinds, and the agencies that enforce them, have been systematically declawed and gutted, leaving private industry more or less free to play in its cherished 19th Century-style sandbox... often with not only tax loopholes they can drive a truck through, but federal subsidies as well. They have an institutionalized system where THE REST OF US PAY THEM TO MAKE MONEY AT OUR EXPENSE.

So why isn't it enough?

It seems that they've reached well beyond the point of diminishing returns, and have actually gotten to where pushing any further will start to seriously impact their own well-being as well as everyone else's. With the populace in poverty, there will be no significant consumer base. Unmitigated large-scale disasters, as mentioned earlier, don't play favorites. And the crumbling of economies and infrastructure will lower both the personal freedom of action and the quality of life for even the wealthiest individuals.

A big deal has been made on many liberal blogs this past week over Rep. Peter King's misguided hearing on "Islamic self-radicalization." Ironically, the Republican party--and the conservative movement as a whole--is perhaps the biggest and most visible example of "self-radicalization" in recent history. They seem to have gotten so used to the shift-and-adjust scuttle to the right that they've crab-walked right off the edge of the precipice. They cannot step back from the brink, because they've long since fallen in. And just like a crab, the only thing they can think to do is try to pull everyone else down along with them.

It's not about accomplishing any sort of discernable goals any more. It's not about feeling their way is best; they don't seem to have a consistent idea of what "their way" is, except that they'll be damned if they'll let anyone else tell them how to do things. It's not even about making sense. In the long pattern of continuously dragging the country right, Republicans have chased their ideology so far up their own assholes that they can't seem to find their way back out.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Nice! Thanks (0+ / 0-)

    Fools are the teachers of the wise. It is foolish to disrespect one's teachers. - Old Man

    by A Voice on Mon Mar 14, 2011 at 02:27:25 PM PDT

  •  Ourobouros! (0+ / 0-)

    The overwhelming consensus of 2,000+ scientific experts from the IPCC& 18 US scientific assns: climate change is happening and is a growing threat to our world.

    by Cenobyte on Mon Mar 14, 2011 at 03:02:08 PM PDT

  •  End times (0+ / 0-)

    There's people who fervently believe in, and yearn for the Rapture and the End of the World.  They're really different from normal people, and there's more than a few of 'em.

    exmearden: Grab every minute of joy you can. 8/30/09

    by Land of Enchantment on Mon Mar 14, 2011 at 03:54:39 PM PDT

  •  They are all nuts (0+ / 0-)

    You have certianly do a very nice job of clearly stating the situation we find ourselves in.

    They seem to live in an alternate reality. Although they all seem to have a common mental disease and it is one that will bring our country down.

    At best they are short sighted at worst we perhaps need to consider the cost of the number of padded cells it's going to take to house these people when they finally collectively tip over the edge..............

    It is the heart that makes a man rich. He is rich according to what he is not what he has -Henry Ward Beecher

    by PSWaterspirit on Mon Mar 14, 2011 at 05:33:06 PM PDT

  •  Pushing with no resistance (0+ / 0-)

    Society is not a static balance. You never get to a stable point where you can stop pushing in the direction that you want things to go. As soon as you stop, someone wanting to go the other way will start pushing a little bit harder and begin to shift the balance point back. The trick is that you need a certain amount of push-back in order to control your own efforts.

    The amount of effort expended in a given direction varies as well. One direction is full of enthusiasm, while the opposing force has temporarily run out of steam. Enthusiasm carries the day!, just not forever. Sometimes everyone is at a lull, and things do seem static until enthusiasm builds again.

    For a number of reasons that I do not understand, the conservative movement has achieved a strong momentum and are wildly pushing against little resistance. They have overbalanced, and do not have the fine control needed to correct their careening, out-of-control advance.

    Just like anyone who has overbalanced, they are picking up even more speed and momentum. Not matter how wildly they wave their arms, or pump their legs, they cannot change direction now.

    This crash will be ugly and painful. Not just for them, but for the rest of us as well.

    Less "WAAAAH!", more progress.

    by IndyGlenn on Mon Mar 14, 2011 at 06:36:32 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site