Skip to main content

This post by Philip Primeau at the new-ish blog Big Tent Revue(the nowadays rare conservative blog that's intelligent and, what's more, willing to recognize that the Founding Fathers were not proto-dittoheads) is a great example of something that's come to really bug me about many smarter conservatives' attempts to find common ground with progressives/liberals.

The issue at hand in the post itself isn't actually too important, but just for the sake of it, it's on whether or not progressives should support public unions:

Public unions are the darlings of the American left.  The money they raise and the foot soldiers they field are integral to Democratic electoral success.This friendship is taken for granted as a natural extension of liberal-labor solidarity.  But does the alliance stand to reason?  Do the first principles of the American left – progressive liberals, mainly – really jibe with the aims and guiding philosophy of public unions?


Progressivism’s critique of corporate power has endured; its critique of public union power has faded away.  It warrants resuscitation.  Public unions are not the evil specters imagined by radical Republicans — yet their obscure and undemocratic habits should offend Americans with progressive sympathies.


Founded to combat cronyism, public unions have become rogue interests dedicated to, fed by, and dependent upon back room deals.  The dream of a neutral civil service devoted to the national business is gone.

Progressivism stands for responsive government that listens to the taxpayers and nurtures the collective good.  It can not stand for patronage.  It can not stand by public unions – at least as long as they are ready and willing to defy the democratic process.

That last line is in reference to an assertion he makes earlier, that the Wisconsin unions, by protesting as they have, are "opposing the public will" and are "actual enemies of our democratically-constructed regime of law and order." I don't really want to go there--because I think that's a really tendentious depiction of the situation in Wisconsin--so I'll just say that anyone who thinks they're going to convince progressives that, despite not being a progressive, they have a better handle than progressives do as to what...progressives should support is going to have a tough time if they're starting-point is characterizing peaceful protestors as "enemies" to the "regime of law and order." Just a hunch.

More importantly, this post is another example in a long line of conservative olive branches to progressives/liberals that fail to take into account the rather considerable focus the latter group tends to have upon the actual world and how people are living in it.

So sticking with this example: there may be more than a little reason to an argument that public unions go against some fundamental progressive goals, but the fact is that public unions in America today represent one of the last lines of defense left for working and middle class people and against insatiable, crude, Ayn-Rand-styled capitalism.

If progressives were to abandon their support of public unions in favor of intellectual purity or what have you, the end result would not be the magical ascension of a left-liberal political coalition that would enact sweeping regulations against corporate malfeasance and offer the bottom 95% of the country some real substantive means to better themselves and their futures. Instead, you'd just have one more class of workers in this country left to the whims of a rather rigged "free market" and unable to prevent draconian wage cuts in favor of tax breaks for millionaires.

And this is a dynamic that I constantly see when conservative (almost always libertarian) commentators start talking about how progressives should be on their side of an issue because of this or that reason. Their argument never, ever has anything to do with how this country's going to look tomorrow or 5 years from now. It's always in the abstract, always focused on ideological purity.

Well, I don't know about all the other progressives/liberals out there, but I really couldn't care less about how internally consistent my views might sound in the warm, plush confines of an upper-level poli-sci classroom. I'm advocating for whatever options are available in the here-and-now to stave off turning the entire country definitively back into the Galtian paradise that was the late 19th-century.

You remember: the Gilded Age, that period of true small government and liberty that gave way to that era of reform; what was it called again? Oh, that's right: the Progressive Era.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Reality. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    It seems remarkable today that such a small crew of men could turn out so much work. You must remember, however, that things were quite different then: the men went to work at seven in the morning and, excepting for the noon hour, worked right through to six at night.... There were fewer holidays then for the workers of the Herrshoff Manufactruing Company, and as I remember it, they were New Year's, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas. Of course they worked all day Saturday.

    The men of those days were strong and tough; sometimes after this ten-hour day they would work overtime at a slight increase in pay, and I recall one man who worked twenty-four hours straight. [....] Many of the men neither smoked nor drank and were as hard and muscular as athletes in training. They were able to work hard, and liked it; they could saw or plane continuously for hours without stopping to rest, and that is one of the reasons they built so many yachts in 1900 with a small crew. But they knew how to make every stroke count. They gloried in accomplishing a good day's work, but I fear the mold they were cast in is lost and that we will never have such accomplishments again.

    The workmen at this time were paid less than fifty cents an hour, generally, although the Herreshoff Company at that time was noted for its high rate of pay.

    --Capt. Nat Herreshoff, the Wizard of Bristol, Sheridan House 1953.

    Such accomplishments:
    Image Hosted by

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Wed Mar 30, 2011 at 09:07:38 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site