Skip to main content

The House just defeated, 206-220, an amendment by Reps. Steve LaTourette (R-OH) and Jerry Costello (D-IL) to strip the union-busting provision from the Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill. Sixteen Republicans voted with all Dems to strip this provision.

Rep. James McGovern (D-MA) had some choice words about this provision of the bill in his statement yesterday.

From Wisconsin to Ohio to Maine, we have seen how Republican politicians are attempting to destroy a century of hard-fought labor protections.  This bill represents more of the same.

The bill would reverse a National Mediation Board rule that allows a majority of those voting in aviation and rail union elections to decide the outcome. Instead, Tea Party extremists want to count workers who chose not to vote as automatic “no’s” against the union.

I wonder if my friends on the other side of the aisle would be willing to use that same standard in congressional elections? I wonder if they’d agree that every registered voter who didn’t vote—for whatever reason—last November would automatically be counted as a “no” vote against them. I doubt it.

Because in the 2010 midterm elections, 40.9 percent of eligible voters cast ballots nationwide.

Under the standard in this bill, not a single current Member of Congress would have won election last year. Not one.

That argument was picked up LaTourette, who blasted his party.

[T]he president has said the won't sign this bill unless this amendment's adopted, the Senate has declared this a non-starter. And so if we want to give fancy speeches — and for just tuning in around the country, you know, welcome to whack-a-union night, because this will be our fourth, fifth anti-union vote that has nothing to do with the aviation system.

That unfortunately wasn't a compelling enough argument for enough Republicans, nor was the veto threat from the White House, should this provision stay in the bill. It's not in the Senate bill, so this fight is going on to conference, where the Senate should have the upper hand with that veto threat backing them up, and the 16 House Republicans who bucked leadership.

Update: The full bill passed 223-196. As for the union-busting provisions, the CWA, the union that had been fighting the bill, sends a statement that reads, in part:

Already, the Obama Administration has threatened to veto the overall FAA bill if the unfair elections provision remains in the legislation after conference negotiations. As the official Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) noted, “If the President is presented with a bill that would not safeguard the ability of railroad and airline workers to decide whether or not they would be represented by a union based upon a majority of the ballots cast in an election or that would degrade safe and efficient air traffic, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the bill.”

The Senate version of the FAA legislation, which already passed that chamber, does not contain this anti-worker provision. CWA looks forward to working with Senators of both parties to strip this violation of fair election standards from the larger bill during the conference committee process....

Beyond ideological opposition to unions, it’s hard to find a reason or rationale for wanting to return to such an egregiously unfair election model. In fact, since last year, when airline and rail workers’ election rules were brought in line with every other election we hold in our democracy, successful and unsuccessful unionization votes have been split roughly 50-50. The rule change is about fair elections for everyone, not an inherent boon to unions.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Fri Apr 01, 2011 at 09:10 AM PDT.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site