Skip to main content

It's April 5th, a big day in Wisconsin political activism. I've voted already, and I'm now preparing to collect recall signatures at a rural polling place. It doesn't really matter where that is, other than a Wisconsin Senate district represented by a Republican Senator who voted for Walker's union-busting and so-much-more bill.

With maps and petition forms in hand, I just wanted a few more copies of the GAB's (Government Accountability Board) "Circulating Recall Petitions at a Polling Place" memorandum. I saved the link, which represents a high level of organization for me.

But wait - it's gone now. What up with that?

Maybe I'm just overreacting here, but I'm wondering who "got to" Wisconsin's GAB.

On the Morning of Monday, March 30, I saw the GAB's "Circulating Recall Petitions at a Polling Place" memorandum here. But, as you can see, it's no longer there.

Page not found The requested page could not be found.

No further instructions or links are noted here, as a conscientious manager might have done.

Now, you have to go through this page, "About Recalls in Wisconsin". Scroll down and to the right to find the topic , "Circulating Recall Petitions at a Polling Place", which opens to this page, "Circulating Recall Petitions at a Polling Place / Amended".

Open that, and you're looking at

"Please Note: The first, second, and fifth points of this guidance have been modified from the guidance posted on March 29th to better reflect current law and the formal opinion cited below."

The amended document is now only available as a link on that page.

The primary change is that now, the phrase, "subject to any separate rules governing the use of and access to the property" has been added to the original.

Original:

"It is permissible to circulate a petition at the polling place if it is unrelated to the candidate contests/referenda on the ballot.

Circulators must refrain from "campaign activity" for any contest on the ballot while on public property within 100 feet of a polling place."

Amended, my emphasis:

"It is permissible to circulate a petition within 100 feet of the entrance to the polling place if it is unrelated to the candidate contests/referenda on the ballot, subject to any separate rules governing the use of and access to the property."

The added phrase pretty much trashes the entire "permissible" concept, making the collection practice subject to the whims of local elections officials, at least on whatever property the polling place is in or on.

A petition circulator can certainly "take it down the road" now, as they ever could. But that leaves them subject to the whims of local law enforcement and their personal ideas of "public" property and what constitutes "disruptive" actions. I've been down that dead-end road myself; that's another whole story, and I don't want to re-live it right now.

This "amended" phrase added after the GAB independently and of it's own accord offered the memorandum on March 29, does not pass my smell test. There must have been feedback to prompt the changes, and I'd like to know where that feedback came from.

Anybody out there adept at filing FOIA's interested in the email communications of the GAB between the times of the original and amended memoranda?

I'd like to know.

Sorry I can't stick around long to field comments, but I've got a now uncertain task ahead, and hope my actions aren't going to be subject to many more "amendments". Seems we've had to deal with more than our share of those around Wisconsin lately, and that's exactly what we're taking action against.

Wish me luck. The good stuff.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site