Skip to main content

The photograph to the right (via is Lynndie England - an administrative clerk at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.  When this photo - and others much worse - surfaced in 2004, smart money was betting to ensure things like this never happened again, Donald "I don't do quagmires" Rumsfeld would simply ban cameras.  There are some reports that's exactly what Rumsfeld did.  There was also an Op/Ed objecting to a ban,  in the Houston Chronicle:

Yes to weapons of mass photography
By CLARENCE PAGE  May 14, 2004

If I had my way, every enlisted man and woman in the military would be issued a digital camera. As we've seen in the scandal about abused Iraqi prisoners, the little gadgets help boost morale by providing snapshots that can be e-mailed back home. They also can come in handy when you need to gather evidence.  I like those little cameras because certain power elites don't.

His response to Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, turned into a bit of a rant of frustration: "We're functioning -- with peacetime restraints, with legal requirements in a wartime situation, in the information age, where people are running around with digital cameras and taking these unbelievable photographs and then passing them off, against the law, to the media, to our surprise, when they had not even arrived in the Pentagon."

No, folks, it's apparently not the administration's gross lack of preparation for the management of post-Saddam Iraq that's the problem, in Rummy's view. It's those pesky soldiers and their Weapons of Mass Photography.

Here on the still semi-frozen tundra, there are Republicans with Rumsfeldian Mindsets ("if there are no photographs, things must be just swell!"); bills have been introduced in the State Senate and State House that would  make it illegal to record photographs and audio/video at an "animal facility."

GOPer State Senators Doug Magnus, Julie Rosen, Bill Ingebrigtsen,  along with House GOPers Rod Hamilton, Tony Cornish, Greg Davids, Dean Urdahl, Bob Dettmer,  Paul Anderson, and the chief RightWingWalnut of 'em all, Steve Drazkowski. (For some strange reason, DFL Senators Rod Skoe and Dan Sparks signed on to this nonsense too).

Spot over at the Cucking Stool takes a look at the legal illogic of these bills in a post titled "Republicans playing with constitutions II - The fools have never heard of Near v. Minnesota".  

Spot states the obvious:  "Whether it’s the First Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, or Article XIII of the Minnesota Constitution, Minnesota’s Republican legislators prove over and over again that they don’t have a freakin’ clue."

I'm saying the local GOPers are simply taking a clue from Rummy; that the GOP - from top to bottom - firmly believes "out of sight" means "out of mind."

Because if there's one thing the GOP demonstrates over and Over and OVER, it's that they are clearly out of their minds.  

**Update**  The Winona Daily News has an editorial on this GOPer plan to ban cameras - it's titled "Our view: Bill just a coverup of bad behavior"

From it:

Magnus’ bill, if adopted, would make Minnesota the fourth state to adopt rules that seem to protect the guilty and punish those trying to make a difference.

While deception by way of a hidden camera isn’t necessarily transparent, those who are engaging in shady business practices aren’t also going to let a camera crew inside to document violations.

This form of video, while guerrilla in nature, is one in which the ends often justify the means. What is exposed is often essential to making sure our treatment of animals is at the very least humane and ethical.

This isn’t just some anti-PETA bill.

This same legislation wouldn’t just block video of animals being led to slaughter, it might also make it a crime to show workers mishandling food, endangering the safety and health of humans.

Furthermore, telling the public what can and can’t be recorded comes perilously close to regulating free speech and putting unnecessary restrictions on a free press, which might also come armed with cameras.

Let’s call this law what it is: A shield for acting irresponsibly and a bully tool to punish anyone who might even dare to expose deplorable behavior.

And this GOPer plan to ban cameras is just another pathetic example of the GOP protecting the Corporate Boardroom at the expense of everyone else.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site