Skip to main content

(freshrant.com)  Is there historical precedent for very large earthquakes to strike in the same region within relatively short intervals?
*****
When there is a major earthquake measuring around 8.0 or more on the Richter scale, there is often another quake of equal or greater force within months of the first temblor.   Keep in mind the March 11th quake off the coast of Japan was measured at 8.9/9.0, the largest quake in the history of Japan.
*
******

The following series of sequential quakes within relatively short intervals were often followed by years, even decades, of far lesser seismic activity.  Note nearly all of the examples of the past two hundred years were recorded in Japan.
******
The 1811-1812 New Madrid Earthquakes
The largest earthquakes ever recorded in the continental United States had their epicenters in Northeast Arkansas and the state of Missouri.  The quakes changed the course of the Mississippi River and caused church bells to ring as far away as Boston.   From December 16, 1811 until February 7, 1812 four shocks occurred measuring between 7.8 and 8.1.
*****
The Tokai-Edo Earthquakes of 1854-1855
Conservative estimates suggest nearly 20,000 people were killed in three successive earthquakes, two of which measured at 8.4.
*
****
The Meiji Era Earthquakes of 1891-1896
This series of three earthquakes began in the fall of 1891 and ended in the summer of 1896, two of which were 8.0 and 8.5, claiming more than 34,000 lives and causing tsunamis as far away as Hawaii and California.
****
The Nankaidō-Fukui Quakes of 1946-1948
Eighteen months separated these 8.1 & 7.1 quakes that killed more than 5000.
*
****
The Great Chilean Earthquake of 1960
At 9.5, the largest earthquake ever measured, occurred following another earthquake in Arauco Province that had already knocked out communication and power causing Chile’s president to cancel celebrations for a public holiday to oversee emergency aid efforts.
*
****
The Nankaidō-Aomori Quakes of 1968
While these two quakes (7.5 and 8.2), occurred only 6 weeks apart in the spring of 1968, they did not cause a large number of casualties.  But the second quake was followed by a tsunami that did cause significant damage to buildings in northern regions of Japan.
****
Has Japan, if not the entire ring of fire, entered new hyperactive era of increased seismic activity?  Beginning with the Chūetsu earthquake in Niigata prefecture in October 2004, there have been no fewer than 15 earthquakes measuring 6.5 or greater.
Of particular note are The Kirul Island Earthquakes in the north of Japan, the only two Japanese temblors of this decade measuring greater than 8.0.   Significantly, they occurred two months apart.  An 8.3 quake struck on November 15, 2006, followed by a 8.1 quake on January 13, 2007.
*
****
I lived on the west coast of Honshu and felt the shaking when The Great Kobe Earthquake of 1995 struck.  It is significant to note that while the quake measured in at “only” 6.8, it claimed more than 6,400 lives because its epicenter was located near a large metropolitan area.  The Kobe quake should be a sober warning to the occupants of other urban areas in Japan.
*
****
The increase in frequency and the severity of quakes in Japan and its accompanying history of multiple and significant seismic events should give pause, but not too long, in planning strategies for future earthquake preparedness.  To repeat a tired truism, for the Japanese and for many of the rest of us living in earthquake zones, it is not if, but when the next major destructive earthquake will occur.
******
Due to the important nature of the content of this article, freshrant.com grants permission for reposting when acknowledgment of freshrant.com is included within the repost.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (5+ / 0-)

    freshrant.com freshrant@facebook freshrant@twitter

    by freshrant on Mon Apr 25, 2011 at 03:40:01 PM PDT

    •  if our "leaders" didn't suck so bad, they'd (0+ / 0-)

      require RIGHT NOW that 95% of spent fuel rods to be removed and put into dry cask storage.  

      Expensive?  Uh yeah, this is nuclear after all.

      Cheaper than the mega disaster unfolding right now?  Uh yeah.

      Do you think TEPCO and the Prime Minister wish they could have a do-over and pay $50 million or even $500 million to have most of the Fukushima spent fuel in dry casks prior to the earthquake, tsunami and power failure?

      I think they would.

      So would the Japanese.  So would I.

      Our leaders in this country should be demanding and requiring the same thing of all of our plants, especially the 53 with a spent fuel pool RIGHT ABOVE the reactor vessel itself.

      “The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking, and thus we drift toward unparalleled catastrophe.” – Einstein (1946)

      by Earth Ling on Mon Apr 25, 2011 at 07:38:24 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  they had a 7.4 aftershock already. (0+ / 0-)

    but say they get another 8+ quake,
    are there any low lying reactors off the east coast?

    George Bush is Living proof of the axiom "Never send a boy to do a man's job" E -2.25 S -4.10

    by nathguy on Mon Apr 25, 2011 at 04:33:57 PM PDT

    •  nathguy (0+ / 0-)

      I don't know about the East coast but having lived within the evacuation zone of Diablo Canyon for 12 years, it is not, although it sits on earthquake faults.  But San Onofre between San Diego and LA is right on the water's edge, a completely unacceptable trifecta of earthquake, tsunami and large population.

      freshrant.com freshrant@facebook freshrant@twitter

      by freshrant on Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 01:13:00 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  California, here it comes! (0+ / 0-)
  •  Japan disaster not covered nearly enough in US (0+ / 0-)

    I wish we had more updates. Here is another article on the subject and the risk to nuclear power plants in Japan.

    http://counterpunch.org/...

    •  Quasimodal (0+ / 0-)

      Yes, we must now focus all this week on the Royal Wedding.  That nuclear news is just so yesterday, even though it has never stopped.  Thanks much for sharing the post!

      freshrant.com freshrant@facebook freshrant@twitter

      by freshrant on Wed Apr 27, 2011 at 01:17:23 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site