Skip to main content

Im not going to pretend to really understand this yet but I know that this needs to be paid attention to.

It started with a clip from the PBS Newshour from yesterday April 27 2011.

The U.S. Supreme Court considered today when lawmakers should recuse themselves from voting on official business. A city councilman in Reno, Nev., had voted on a casino project, even though his campaign manager served as a consultant for it. An ethics commission censured the councilman, but the state Supreme Court ruled the ethics law violated his free speech rights.

I remember that Citizens United started off as some unheard of small case that nobody cared about.  The justices seemed to be on the right side until suddenly they greatly expanded the case and decided that "it was wrong to not allow corporations to 'speak' as much as they are financially capable of".

This case seems to suggest that ethics rules that prohibit elected officials from favoring entities that either paid them or may improve their financial status would actually be an infringement upon their free speech rights.

In other words,  politicans have the right to break the law becasue to not allow it would infringe upon their freedom of speech.

absurdity.  I hope Im misunderstanding this.

I think the justices on the US Supreme Court are mostly thinking Ok so far but they were at the beginning of Citizens United as I recall.

see this link at SCOTUS blog

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site