Skip to main content

While most Americans take some satisfaction in the death of Osama bin Laden, the event must be creating some cognitive dissonance for birthers and their ilk. This bloodthirsty terrorist is dead because a man with an Islamic middle name gave the order to apprehend him.

Tea Baggers or political fundamentalists were strongly inclined to believe that Barack Obama was a Muslim. This meant he was the hated "Other," was not a real American, was not a legitimate president, and was not committed to the war on terror.

Now it is clear that President Barack Obama is responsible for the death of the hated Osama bin Laden.

This fact must be hard for a political fundamentalist to swallow. It is all the more of a jolt when we note that days before this event, Barack Obama released his long form birth certificate.  Obama proved that Donald Trump and the birthers had been entirely wrong about him.

It is hard to guess how the Tea Bagger political fundamentalists will respond. Maybe they will become "Deathers," and demand to see a Pakistanian death certificate  for Osama. They could simply deny both the birth certificate and what seems to be the well-documented death of Bin Laden. But to do so will require mental gymnastics that would defy all reason and may even be too much for many of the Tea Baggers to sustain.

Should they accept the realities of the Obama birth certificate and the death of bin Laden, it might be possible that some of the afflicted will slowly withdraw from the political fantasyland that is political fundamentalism.

They might come to question the unsupported claims that Obama's stimulus program and health care reform somehow were responsible for joblessness. The madness and mental fog induced by political fundamentalism enabled the Republicans to successfully sell these notions in 2010. Republicans were even were able to claim that TARP was an Obama idea, and we still hear that today.

Political fundamentalism descends upon people when they face multiple crises and fear that their nation is in sharp decline. They think someone did this to us. They fear they are being punished for straying from the nation's established wisdom or "givens."  They seek emotional solace in embracing simple, all-encompassing explanations and  whatever they think is the conventional wisdom. They grow impatient with complexity, ambiguity, and outlooks that require facts and careful thought.  It become a matter of relieving emotional stress. This is why people voted in 2010 to go back to the very policies that nearly wrecked the financial system and economy.

Political fundamentalism is also a tribalistic reaction--Dionne says extreme nationalism, so they reject "others," like homosexuals, blacks, immigrants, Muslims, and progressives. People under the sway of political fundamentalism are attracted to the charges and scapegoating offered by demagogic figures like Donald Trump, Sarah Palin, and Michele Bachmann.

Until a week ago, it was hard to see how the tied of political fundamentalism could be stemmed. Maybe that is why so many Democrats have had so little to say of late.

The appearance of Obama's long form birth certificate and now the death of Osama bin Laden at Obama's orders should interject enough reality to the American consciousness  to help some people escape the grip of political hysteria and irrationality.

This is the time for Democrats to come forward with facts and explanations.

They need to show that Obama has had a strong track record going after terrorists. He brought "the surge" to Afghanistan, ramped up efforts against terrorists in Pakistan itself, and now has nailed Bin Laden.

Democrats also need to begin the hard task of restoring some sanity to the economics debate.

1) The fact is that the Great Recession and near destruction of the financial system was the resupt of Republican policies. Yes, some Democrats went along with some of it, and this must be admitted.

2) The stimulus headed off a recession and brought what recovery we now have.

3) Cutting spending does not create jobs. This idea does not come from the study of economics; it comes from political ideology.    No one has shown how that can possibly happen.

After these facts have been established. Democrats can start describing the Ryan Plan.
The key to derailing it is to convince senior citizens that it would be immoral for them to  accept its benefits in return for scutting the benefits their children and grandchildren deserve. The issues are morality and community.

There is much more to be done to restore some reason and reality to our political
discussions.

The Democrats have an opening here. If they miss it, there may be disaster for them in 2012.  This opening gives them an opportunity to off set a long list of advantages the Republicans will enjoy in 2012.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  They will never be satisfied. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Spoc42

    There now is the "There is no proof that he is really dead" or "Gee, it sure was convenient to dump the body in the brink" crowd.

    •  In other words, they are (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      nellgwen, Spoc42

      impervious to realities.

      I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

      by beemerr90s on Tue May 03, 2011 at 12:15:06 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Partly true... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Marjmar

      Yes, it is true that the hard-core birthers (e.g., Orly Taitz) will likely never be persuaded otherwise, no matter what evidence  is presented.  

      But those are not the ones we need to focus on.  There are many, many people who "aren't sure" where Obama was born, or that are persuadable.  

      "When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

      by Bob Duck on Tue May 03, 2011 at 12:48:32 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Throw their "Patriotism" back in their faces. (3+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Spoc42, eataTREE, Marjmar

        "Are you saying the United States Navy Seal Team 6 are all lying to protect a muslim president?   You fucking wanker!"

        apparently due to ancient hardware and the transition to dk4 I can't recc tip jars or comments any longer so in lieu of the 'standard nod' you'll see a variety of replies until this gets fixed or becomes a mighty big fucking pain in the ass

        by oopsaDaisy on Tue May 03, 2011 at 01:53:45 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

    •  They aren't seeking satisfaction (0+ / 0-)

      They're seeking an excuse for their hate. There is no result of any kind in any type of situation that will ever satiate their desire to hate the [pick one: black guy, democrat, some other perjorative] that they've been told to hate.

  •  Yes, (0+ / 0-)

    huddle in civilised fear of the tribes, lol

    Mine is huge, and you never hear us coming :-)

    When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace- Hendrix

    by Maori on Tue May 03, 2011 at 12:12:04 PM PDT

  •  good analysis, excellent suggestions on tactics (0+ / 0-)

    Thanks, Chuck.  You are again right on the mark.   Democrats must shape a winning message for the 2012 campaign that its appealing to both their core constituencies and the independents.

    Defending the social safety net and talking about how to create jobs though additional investments in infrastructure, innovation and education will be key for their own base.  Starting to pull out of Afganistan in a  slow but steady pace after July 2011 will also be important.  Downgrading our footprint and involvement in Iraq even further will also help.

    For the independents, they need to emphasize the successes in the war of terror and the killing of Bin Laden and also that the President has made a sincere effort to control deficits in a balanced, responsible, and fair manner, as compared to the extreme proposals of Ryan that offer tax breaks to the rich while asking for cuts to Medicare and Medicaid.

    And as you said, they should explain that Obama and the 111th Congress averted the misery of another Great Depression and set us on a path of recovery.  Whatever jobs were created (more than 1.8 million so far + 2.3 million jobs saved by the Stimulus) was the result of the Democratic efforts alone !!!  GOP only obstructed in 2009-2010 and since Jan 2011 they have focused on anything else than creating jobs !!!  

    Finally, they should explain that our deficit predicament is the result of the trickle down economics of Reagan and the two Bushes ...  Bring charts and graphs, if necessary, but establish that Obama has only contributed $1 trillion the deficit. in his 2 years and not what GOP says he has; by contrast GOP policies and presidents since Reagan are responsible for $10.8 trillion of the $13.3 trillion of national debt accumulated since 1981; Clinton is responsible for $1.5 trillion (1992-2000) and Obama for $1 trillion so far (2009-2010).  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site