Skip to main content

On Thursday, John Boehner and the House Republican leadership team unveiled their "Plan for America's Job Creators."  As he repeatedly made clear before the Economic Club of New York and again on CBS Face the Nation, Boehner's "job creators" are the top two percent of income earners whose Bush tax cuts President Obama has proposed ending.  And that presents a bit of problem for the Republicans.  After all, George W. Bush's tax breaks for the wealthy sadly coincided with the worst period of job creation of any president since Herbert Hoover.  Which means the GOP plan for America's job creators is just another tax cut windfall for the gilded class.

Earlier this month, Speaker Boehner warned that "The mere threat of tax hikes causes uncertainty for job creators -- uncertainty that results in less risk-taking and fewer jobs."  As he told Harry Smith of CBS two weeks ago:

"The top one percent of wage earners in the United forty percent of the income taxes...The people he's {President Obama] is talking about taxing are the very people that we expect to reinvest in our economy."

If so, those expectations were sadly unmet under George W. Bush.  After all, the last time the top tax rate was 39.6% during the Clinton administration, the United States enjoyed rising incomes, 23 million new jobs and budget surpluses.  Under Bush? Not so much.

On January 9, 2009, the Republican-friendly Wall Street Journal summed it up with an article titled simply, "Bush on Jobs: the Worst Track Record on Record." (The Journal's interactive table quantifies his staggering failure relative to every post-World War II president.) The dismal 3 million jobs created under President Bush didn't merely pale in comparison to the 23 million produced during Bill Clinton's tenure. In September 2009, the Congressional Joint Economic Committee charted Bush's job creation disaster, the worst since Hoover:

That dismal performance prompted David Leonhardt of the New York Times to ask last fall, "Why should we believe that extending the Bush tax cuts will provide a big lift to growth?" His answer was unambiguous:

Those tax cuts passed in 2001 amid big promises about what they would do for the economy. What followed? The decade with the slowest average annual growth since World War II. Amazingly, that statement is true even if you forget about the Great Recession and simply look at 2001-7...

Is there good evidence the tax cuts persuaded more people to join the work force (because they would be able to keep more of their income)? Not really. The labor-force participation rate fell in the years after 2001 and has never again approached its record in the year 2000.

Is there evidence that the tax cuts led to a lot of entrepreneurship and innovation? Again, no. The rate at which start-up businesses created jobs fell during the past decade.

It's no wonder Leonhardt followed his first question with another.  "I mean this as a serious question, not a rhetorical one," he asked, "Given this history, why should we believe that the Bush tax cuts were pro-growth?"  Or as Mark Shields asked and answered in April:

"Do tax cuts help 'job creators' or 'robber barons'?"

Just days after the Washington Post documented that George W. Bush presided over the worst eight-year economic performance in the modern American presidency, the New York Times in January 2009 featured an analysis comparing presidential performance going back to Eisenhower. As the Times showed, George W. Bush, the first MBA president, was a historic failure when it came to expanding GDP, producing jobs and even fueling stock market growth.  Apparently, America's job creators can create a lot more jobs when their taxes are higher - even much higher - than they are today.

The epic failures of the Bush tax cuts for America's supposed job creators hardly end there.  The U.S. poverty rate began rising in 2005, well before the onset of the December 2007 Bush recession.  As David Cay Johnston document, average household income fell after the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003, dropping to about $58,500 in 2008 from $61,500 in 2000.  The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) found that the Bush tax cuts accounted for almost half of the mushrooming deficits during his tenure, and, if made permanent, over the next 10 years would contribute more to the U.S. budget deficit than the Obama stimulus, the TARP program, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and revenue lost to the recession put together.  As the data show, the Bush tax cuts provided a massive payday for the wealthy, helping fuel record income inequality.

Despite that record failure, House Republicans want to give the job creators who don't create jobs another jaw-dropping tax cut.

As Ezra Klein, Paul Krugman and Steve Benen among others noted, the "Plan for America's Job Creators" is simply a repackaging of years of previous proposals and GOP bromides.  (As Klein pointed out, the 10 page document "looks like the staffer in charge forgot the assignment was due on Thursday rather than Friday, and so cranked the font up to 24 and began dumping clip art to pad out the plan.")  At the center of it is the same plan from the Ryan House budget passed in April to cut the top individual and corporate tax rates to 25%.

The price tag for the Republican proposal is a jaw-dropping $4.2 trillion.  And as Matthew Yglesias explained, earlier analyses of similar proposals in Ryan's Roadmap reveal that working Americans would have to pick up the tab left unpaid by upper-income households:

This is an important element of Ryan's original "roadmap" plan that's never gotten the attention it deserves. But according to a Center for Tax Justice analysis (PDF), even though Ryan features large aggregate tax cuts, ninety percent of Americans would actually pay higher taxes under his plan.

In other words, it wasn't just cuts in middle class benefits in order to cut taxes on the rich. It was cuts in middle class benefits and middle class tax hikes in order to cut taxes on the rich. It'll be interesting to see if the House Republicans formally introduce such a plan and if so how many people will vote for it.

If this all sounds hauntingly familiar, it should. When it comes to using the tax code to line the pockets of the wealthiest people in America, House Republicans simply want the next decade to look like the last one.  That is, gargantuan tax cuts for America's so-called "job creators"; no jobs for Americans.

* Crossposted at Perrspectives *

Originally posted to Jon Perr on Fri May 27, 2011 at 12:13 PM PDT.

Also republished by J Town, ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement, and Community Spotlight.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Louise, bink, davej, buffalo soldier, PrahaPartizan, Geenius at Wrok, TrueBlueMajority, emal, johnmorris, Shockwave, LynChi, billlaurelMD, SanJoseLady, oysterface, frsbdg, devtob, frisco, DrSpike, hubcap, ssgbryan, concernedamerican, bronte17, 88kathy, EricS, ginmar, CalvinV, aimeeinkc, otto, bobinson, Nate Roberts, Cedwyn, wader, Tomtech, Quege, Redfire, hangingchad, emmasnacker, TexDem, pat bunny, BMarshall, Bluehawk, Catte Nappe, Timbuk3, riverlover, parkslopper50, zerelda, vacantlook, Toddlerbob, rambler american, Josiah Bartlett, Armand451, KathyK, Frank Vyan Walton, Gowrie Gal, vcmvo2, Skennet Boch, Into The Woods, NoMoreLies, TexasTom, blueyedace2, caul, alaprst, SherwoodB, disrael, Independent Musings, wizardkitten, Philoguy, mike101, arch, drewfromct, Brooke In Seattle, YucatanMan, Kevskos, Gary Norton, where4art, GreyHawk, AnotherMassachusettsLiberal, SBandini, Savvy813, The Raven, bunsk, Rogneid, psyched, JanF, kkjohnson, zozie, begone, MadGeorgiaDem, third Party please, K S LaVida, Hirodog, Orinoco, irishwitch, Keone Michaels, Clytemnestra, tobendaro, Themistoclea, liberalconservative, mooshter, sleipner, dougymi, Magnifico, Shakludanto, Wary, arlene, jwhitmill, kck, NBBooks, erratic, Terminus, happy camper, CTLiberal, Preston S, ER Doc, middleagedhousewife, rage, profh, BB10, Dreaming of Better Days, blueoregon, zedaker, Eric the Blue, Hedwig, markthshark, Leap Year, cpresley, orrg1, satyrday, donnamarie, Loudoun County Dem, dmh44, FWIW, Dartagnan, martucio, HeartlandLiberal, Wendy in FL, joedemocrat, puzzled, jayden, rivamer, mudslide, rontripp, millwood, Bridge Master, carpunder, JML9999, MichiganGirl, Ralphdog, MKinTN, Scioto, wayoutinthestix, ScottyUrb, OleHippieChick, Youffraita, crescentdave, elwior, jakebob, jamess, monkeybrainpolitics, pkohan, happymisanthropy, Neosho, WoodlandsPerson, venger, Karl Rover, allie123, HarpboyAK, briefer, HoosierDeb, DavidW, csaw, maggiejean, Bule Betawi, McGahee220, DontTaseMeBro, Satya1, arendt, bushondrugs, RustyCannon, Partisan Progressive, Zotz, CamillesDad1, DefendOurConstitution, oxfdblue, Keith Pickering, Question Authority, Dragon5616, deviant24x, Larsstephens, ppl can fly, brooklyns finest, Renie57, political junquie, eXtina, stunzeed, dagnome, ctlrick, Kristina40, DiegoUK, Actuary4Change, MsGrin, Floande, Oh Mary Oh, slice, theKgirls, targetdemographic, Bob Duck, nicethugbert, Suprk, stonedoubt, Mr Raymond Luxury Yacht, Paula68154, princesspat, Lorikeet, Wolf10, dle2GA, BarackStarObama, Yogurt721, floridablue, tardis10, terabthia2, whoknu, yaque, pensivelady, phiddle, MinistryOfTruth, randomfacts, SoCalSal, Book of Hearts, stlsophos, Ezekial 23 20, johnnr2, Tentwenty, Thousandwatts, IndyGlenn, stormicats, wretchedhive, Barbie02360, Flying Goat, damfino, oblios arrow, IndieGuy, ahumbleopinion, dance you monster, Eric Nelson, oldcrow, done lurking, S F Hippie, shaggies2009, a2nite, teabaggerssuckbalz, supercereal, radical simplicity, MartyM, Margd, cassandracarolina, thePhoenix13, mfcrooks, etherealfire, WheninRome, Captain Chaos, here in lbc

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site