Skip to main content

So how much have you loved the past few weeks?

As we predicted, if we went out and confronted Republicans as they rushed forward with their plans to kill Social Security and Medicare, those very same Republicans would find themselves running backwards, fast –and, even better, we hoped that Democrats might finally figure out that attacking on an issue that matters to the public, day after day, all the way through November of 2012, is a smart thing to do…and, for at least the past three weeks, they did figure it out.

But hey: why should a good thing last?

Over the next eight weeks we are going to see Republicans try to fix all this by turning the Democrats into Medicare-slashing “co-conspirators”; the vehicle through which this is supposed to occur is the debt ceiling negotiation, which has an August 2nd deadline.

That means the question before us today is…will Democrats continue to attack Republicans for their plans to turn Medicare into a “it’s not Government’s problem” kind of program – or do they think there’s political advantage to be found in “meeting them halfway”?

I’d love to tell you there’s nothing to worry about.
Unfortunately, I’m a bit more cynical than all that.

… there are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself; another which appreciates what others comprehend; and a third which neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless.

--From Niccolò Machiavegli’s The Prince

You really do have to admire Republicans: after folks began to see the Ryan Plan for the attack on Medicare that it really is, angry crowds of what appeared to be otherwise good and decent Republican folk started showing up at the Town Hall meetings of good and decent Republican Members of Congress…so they fell back, gave it a bit of thought, and it now appears they are going to try something that will sound familiar: they hope to hold the entire United States economy hostage by forcing a deal, as we mentioned above, as the August deadline to increase the National Debt Limit approaches.

And the whole idea is to force the Democrats into sharing the blame for slashing Medicare; here’s what Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-He Don’t Represent You) had to say about that:

“If there is a grand bargain of some kind with the president of the United States, none of it will be usable for either side in next year’s election — none of it. We can do something important for the country together, and this is the opportunity.”

You know how they talk about “reading between the lines”? Sounds to me like what’s important in McConnell’s country is to convince Democrats that “if you agree to whack Medicare with us…we would never turn around and blame you, the Democrats, for doing all the cutting, just in time for the ’12 election” – but somehow I just don’t believe him.

That seems to leave the Democrats with three options: they could make every Republican in the world so very happy and do a deal ahead of the debt limit that embraces the Republican “voucher/not voucher” concept, or they could do a “face saving” deal that introduces something benign like cutting by negotiating for drug costs, or they could hang tough and not give an inch as the “Day Of Debt Limit” approaches, and force the Republicans to keep falling backwards, as they have been these past few weeks.

History suggests that hanging tough is not the Democrats’ preferred option, to put it gently; but let’s see if we can’t make an argument for doing just that.

(Fun Fact: did you know that the Medicare Trustees believe the current form of “Obamacare”, all by itself, will cut 25% from the long-term cost of providing Medicare?

According to the House Republican Conference, in 2009, that cost was about $88 trillion – and that means, if you believe the Republicans, that “Obamacare” has already reduced the long-term cost of government by just a bit over 20 trillion dollars. And now, let’s return you to our regular programming.)

It makes perfect sense, if you ask me, to try and get some sort of agreement that allows Medicare to negotiate drug prices, and looking down the years, the savings would be considerable, but there is a political risk in such an approach.

The 2010 election featured a whole lot of conversation about how Democrats were “cutting $500 billion from Medicare”, and there’s no reason to believe that the same thing wouldn’t happen again.

“But that makes no sense”, you’ll tell me “since the Republicans will have made the same deal to make the same cuts.”

To which I’ll have to reply that 2012 is far, far away, politically speaking, and memories are short, and corporate money is long, and logic and reason will not prevent half the “Hustler Community” from trying to sell America on the idea that only Republicans can save Medicare…and if they go along with cutting, now, the Democratic half of the Hustler Community probably won’t be able to fight the untruths later.

On the other hand…

Congressional Democrats, my dear, dear, friends, has life ever felt better for y’all than it has felt these past few weeks, when you’ve seen Republicans running in fear from their own Campaign 2012 budget because of the public outrage? Did you love the images of 70,000 people descending on the Wisconsin State Capitol more than just about anything?

Well, what do you think is going to happen when you get to stand up in front of the American people and tell them that no matter what Republicans threaten to do, you will not destroy Medicare? That you will not, ever, be bullied into decimating a program that is so popular that nearly every American voter not named Koch or Brother supports protecting it?

Republicans are going to cave, big-time, especially if public anger is well-targeted and in concert with what you’re doing…and recently, it’s been every bit of that.

There are even Democrats who might be inclined to cave – but they need to think about the advantages of standing firm: Senator Ben Nelson’s not going to make friends in Nebraska’s senior centers by trying to cut Medicare; Steny Hoyer (number three Democrat in the House), who represents Maryland’s 5th District, which is rich in retirees, won’t be either.

So this is it, folks: Republicans are, today, trying to tie Democrats in political knots with a debt ceiling vote that includes a deal to make Medicare into the Peggy Bundy of government programs (you know: costs a lot, doesn’t do anything…), and Democrats have a chance to crush the Republicans, politically, for doing it – but knowing the history of dealing with our Democratic friends, the odds are pretty good that unless we force them to stand firm, they’re going to crumble like a substandard Chinese apartment building on a windy day.

I know it feels like we’ve won, but the next 60 days are going to be huge, and it’s up to us to continue to “provide the proper motivation” if we don’t want to end up on the wrong side of this thing.

So keep pushing, stay on the phones, be a pain in the butt to your Member of Congress – and most importantly of all, remind them that they better not do anything too heinous to either Medicare or Social Security…because if they do, they could very well be retired from Congress and depending on these programs a whole lot sooner than they ever could have imagined.

This is your government, and if you want it to represent your future this is the time to be heard – and don’t forget, if you have to be politically active, it’s a lot easier to do it in June than it was to do it in Wisconsin in March…so c’mon, people, get your summer clothes on, and go hit the streets.

We’ll all be glad you did.

FULL DISCLOSURE: This post was written with the support of the CAF State Blogger's Network Project.

Originally posted to fake consultant on Thu Jun 02, 2011 at 06:08 AM PDT.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement and Social Security Defenders.


describe how the democrats will react:

5%1 votes
5%1 votes
10%2 votes
15%3 votes
65%13 votes

| 20 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  a deal's gonna get made... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    ...and probably fairly soon - so we aren't done applying pressure yet.

    "...this election has never been about me. it's about you."--barack obama

    by fake consultant on Thu Jun 02, 2011 at 06:08:03 AM PDT

    •  Lets not underestimate the stupidity.... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      fake consultant

      of the democratic party. They are the idiots that didnt pass the Dream Act when they had a chance. They need better framing from Pelosi. Throw Pelosi in the closet, Weiner, its my photo, but I didnt send it, and Hoyer along with her and grab Clinton. He can explain to many the complexity of the issue. Why? He speaks hick, stick, dumb and ignorant...and they love him.

      Paul Ryans budget is in fact a suicide note.

      by tdslf1 on Thu Jun 02, 2011 at 08:19:02 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  there's a lot of... (0+ / 0-)

        ..."clinton can save us" out there - but democrats better learn to speak on their own.

        i saw spencer coggs (he of the wisconsin state senate) give a speech in olympia, washington, to a labor rally not long ago...and not one single washington state democrat was willing to address the thousands of folks right outside the state capitol who wanted to see them that day, and to me that's the real problem.

        and honestly, i really don't trust steny hoyer.

        "...this election has never been about me. it's about you."--barack obama

        by fake consultant on Thu Jun 02, 2011 at 12:09:28 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Democrats are in the driver's seat (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fake consultant

    Republicans have voted in favor of dismantling Medicare, which has proven to be toxic to them.  They would love nothing more than to have Democrats bail them out by voting to cut Medicare as a prerequisite for Republicans voting to raise the debt ceiling.  And, if recent history is any guide, Democrats (with guidance from the WH) will do just that.  This will be a political blunder and lost opportunity.

    With the most recent House vote on the "clean" debt ceiling vote, Republican have doubled down and painted themselves into a corner.  They are all on record as basically saying they are willing to drive this country off a economic cliff.  All Democrats have to do is stand back and watch the Republicans self-destruct.  

    Republicans have a vested interest in raising the debt ceiling.  Their corporate overlords would require a pound of flesh if they were to not raise the debt ceiling.  They know where their bread is buttered.  At the same time, raising the debt ceiling would drive their tea party supporters even crazier than they already are.  On the flipside, if the Republicans were foolish enough to not raise the debt ceiling to coddle their tea party base, they would most assuredly get creamed in the 2012 elections.

     In short, the Republicans are on the horns of a dilemma of their own making.  As I said before, all the Democrats have to do is to not bail them out by voting to cut Medicare.  

    Democrats should only vote "yes" on raising the debt ceiling if it involves no cuts to Medicare.  If the Republicans want to pass a debt ceiling bill that requires cuts to Medicare, that's their business and entirely within their power.  I say let them do it.  

    At some point, Democrats have to call the Republicans bluff.  This would seem like a great time to do it.    

    •  here's the thing: (0+ / 0-)

      democrats had their chance to vote on that "clean" bill...and they ran away from it.

      the fact that they did not pass that bill out of the house means they will already have to answer questions next year why they didn't - and it would have been genius to surprise the rs, pass the bill out, and send it over to harry reid to manage...which would have caused senate republicans to find some justification for blocking the bill, whixh would have looked even worse.

      steny hoyer's a cautious guy - and to me, he's cautious like dick gephart or mike dukakis were cautious - and when you're trying to crush your opponent, cautious ain't always your best friend.

      "...this election has never been about me. it's about you."--barack obama

      by fake consultant on Thu Jun 02, 2011 at 12:31:10 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  This comment (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fake consultant
    (Fun Fact: did you know that the Medicare Trustees believe the current form of “Obamacare”, all by itself, will cut 25% from the long-term cost of providing Medicare?

    And probably that 25% figure doesn't include cost savings that will occur because of ACA provisions not scored by the CBO.

    The NYT had a piece about the ACA's "Value-Based Performance" payment method. Starting in Oct 2012, inpt reimbursement will be linked to quality/outcome as well as episode. You don't measure up, reimbursement goes down.

  •  BTW, good diary. EOM. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fake consultant

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site