Skip to main content

Green Organizing in Red States: The Fight Against Big Oil's Next Pipeline
Saturday, June 18, 2011 at 10:30 AM CDT • L100 AB
Kate Sheppard, Marty Cobenais, David Daniel, Jane Fleming Kleeb, Nick Berning

In recent Congressional fights over environmental protections, polluters' influence has often overpowered that of progressives' often narrow and under-energized coalitions. One environmental campaign that has broken this mold is the fight to stop a pipeline that, if approved by the Obama administration, would carry the dirtiest oil on Earth from Canada's tar sands across six U.S. states to refineries in Texas. Ranchers in Nebraska, landowners in Texas, Native Americans and other unexpected allies have mobilized to take the lead in organizing resistance to the project, called the Keystone XL. These unconventional partnerships have changed the political calculus of the pipeline decision, turning a sure bet for Big Oil into a controversial environmental decision for the Obama administration. This panel will explore what has brought and kept these groups together, as well as opportunities for similar types of unconventional alliances to work in other environmental campaigns.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Not the only pipeline proposal in the (0+ / 0-)

    Great White North.

    And on face value what you report makes no sense.

     Texas oil refineries use the highest quality US oil, They dont have the catalytic crackers to break down the long chain hydrocarbon molecules, as a precursor to feeding the crude into a refinery to make gasoline. IIRC No mid south refinery has this capacity.

    Which brings me another pipeline project.

    Nat gas pipelines from Alaska's Prudhoe Bay and the Mackenzie River Delta area of Canada can provide tens billions s of cubic feet of Nat Gas to "Properly power the tar sands project". what this means is building the catalytic crackers near the tar sands, along with a preliminary refinery, whose output is syncrude not gasoline. Syncrude is far easier to send thru a pipeline, to say... Texas.

    There are at least 3 or 4 proposals that in various configurations all have the  potential to dovetail together.

    There is something on the order of 100 trillion cubic feet of Nat Gas up north, how do you expect to power the Tar Sands project? Well guess what Nat Gas is one way, or how about 10 or 12 nuclear fission plants.

    Opposing one little pipeline project is all warm and fuzzy, failing to understand how an individual project fits into the grander scheme is looking at trees, not the forest.

    SO I have to ask you, how do you expect to provide the energy necessary to power the Tar Sands project, from the viewpoint of big oil?

    FDR 9-23-33, "If we cannot do this one way, we will do it another way. But do it we will.

    by Roger Fox on Sat Jun 18, 2011 at 01:04:25 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site