Skip to main content

In this weekend's New York Times, Annie Snider of Greenwire wrote Energy Concerns Could Make Panetta First Green DOD Chief

The article addresses the fact that today's military is fuel intensive. Furthermore, many of the deaths in both wars have been troops protecting fuel supply lines, more than 3,000 of those in Afghanistan alone.

Panetta has been hired to cut money from the military budget. Current active duty officers, including former Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike McMullen, keep putting military benefits on the table, particularly health care for retirees. Would it be possible to find a large chunk of savings by changing how we think about and use fuel in the US Military?

In the article Snider points out:

At the same time, fuel costs are hitting the department's budget hard -- in 2008, when oil prices reached record highs, the Pentagon spent about $20 billion on fuel alone. Every $10 increase in the price of a barrel of crude costs the department an extra $1.3 billion.

Convincing commanders in the field to start looking for less energy intense solutions won't be an easy deal. Currently, those commanders don't pay directly for their fuel usage, so their is little incentive to 'go green.' This really is a case of making changes at the top. Secretary Panetta will need to educate his senior officers on the true costs of gas and oil.

Can it be done?

Welcome to the Military Monday Open Thread... feel free to drop by and say hello, join the conversation, or ask questions of our Military Community Members!

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site