Skip to main content

cross-posted from Main Street Insider

The debt limit is a largely symbolic check on excessive borrowing which in the past has been frequently raised with little to no controversy. Such periodic increases are necessary to keep the government running and paying its bills, regardless of ideology.

However, Congressional Republicans are now demanding that certain conditions must be met in order to win their approval of a debt ceiling increase. They have termed their list of demands Cut, Cap and Balance, and claim it is a necessary measure in order to keep the government debt from spiraling out of control, and thus keep the country functioning.

Yet the Cut, Cap and Balance Act scheduled to reach the House floor this week is anything but necessary to keep the country functioning. Rather, it is the crown jewel, the final step of conservatives' long-pursued "Starve the Beast" strategy to downsize government. It would radically limit the flexibility of the federal government to provide a social safety net, buttress the economy in tough times and respond to great national challenges, now and into the future.

But don't take my word for it. Check out this week's 90 Second Summary and decide for yourself:

90 Second Summaries: Season 2, Episode 16
H.R. 2560: Cut, Cap and Balance Act of 2011

Introduced 7/15/11
Sponsor: Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT3). Key cosponsors: Reps. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC5), Reid Ribble (R-WI8)
Click here to download this summary (pdf)

Co-Sponsors: 87 (0 Democrats, 87 Republicans). Full list at http://thomas.loc.gov/...

Senate Companion: S. 1340, sponsored by Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT). 32 cosponsors, all Republicans. Similar but not identical to the House bill. Has been endorsed by Minority Leader McConnell (R-KY), but path remains unclear with Democrats strongly opposed.

Status: Rules Committee meeting scheduled for 7/18/11. Will likely reach the House floor on 7/19/11. Unclear whether it will pass.

Purpose: Conservative Republicans have long sought to downsize government, arguably as far back as the New Deal's enactment in the 1930s. Because gutting popular social programs without a compelling reason would be political suicide, anti-government strategists such as Grover Norquist have advocated a plan known as “Starve the Beast” in recent decades. This plan has involved repeatedly enacting large tax cuts tilted heavily towards the rich, fomenting deep disenchantment with the government, and running up enormous deficits. Using the specter of runaway debt as an excuse, it is then possible to enact measures that roll back popular programs enacted in the Progressive, New Deal and Great Society eras.

Decades of disciplined and effective organizing have created the conditions where drastic cuts to popular programs are now possible. Thus, Republicans are advancing the “Cut, Cap and Balance” plan as the final step to Starve the Beast.

Summary: H.R. 2560 would set in place a framework to permanently shrink the government.  Specifically, it would:

1) Cut spending by:
• Cutting FY12 non-security discretionary spending by $76 billion, bringing it below 2008 levels;
• Cutting all mandatory spending other than Social Security, Medicare, veterans' benefits and interest by $35 billion;
• Adopting the President's defense budget recommendations and allowing for war supplementals of $126.4 billion;

2) Cap federal spending as a percentage of GDP by:
• Setting a limit of 21.7% for FY2013, declining to 19.9% by FY2017 and remaining roughly constant through FY2021. These limits encompass all mandatory and discretionary spending, including interest on the debt;
• Assigning responsibility to determine spending limits to the Office of Management and Budget;

3) Balance budgets in the future by:
• Requiring that the debt limit cannot be raised until Congress sends a Balanced Budget Amendment to the states;
• Mandating that such a constitutional amendment must contain both a provision that caps spending as a percentage of GDP and a requirement that a 2/3 vote in both chambers is necessary for any tax increase.

Supporters: most Republicans, conservative think tanks, Tea Party organizations

• Supporters see federal spending as out of control, and Washington cannot be trusted to rein it in without binding constraints. They believe a Balanced Budget Amendment is the only foolproof way to accomplish this goal.

Opponents: Democrats, CBPP and allied organizations, AFL-CIO, NAACP, NOW, etc.

• Opponents see this as perhaps the most fundamentally dangerous piece of budget legislation advanced in decades. They claim this plan is so extreme that not even the much-maligned Ryan Budget would satisfy its draconian requirements, which would be virtually irreversible if enacted. The measure would also render measures to combat economic downturns functionally impossible.

Further links
Full bill text: http://www.govtrack.us/...
Paul Krugman explains Starve the Beast in 2003: http://www.nytimes.com/...
CBPP intro to the federal budget process (explains budget authority vs. outlays): http://www.cbpp.org/...
Republican Study Committee summary of the plan: http://rsc.jordan.house.gov/...
The Hill article on opposition to the balanced budget amendment: http://bit.ly/...
Robert Greenstein statement on the bill: http://www.cbpp.org/...
Washington Post article on the bill's status: http://wapo.st/...

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Rusty5329

    "Are you ready for the real revolution, which is the evolution of the mind?"

    by optimo on Mon Jul 18, 2011 at 06:30:03 AM PDT

  •  Probably ought to check with California (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Rusty5329

    on how this worked out.

    a requirement that a 2/3 vote in both chambers is necessary for any tax increase.

    Notice: This Comment © 2011 ROGNM

    by ROGNM on Mon Jul 18, 2011 at 07:02:07 AM PDT

    •  David Waldman.... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ROGNM

      made that same point in his "This Week in Congress" post today. Making it virtually impossible to raise taxes is just a bad idea that ties your hands when it comes to economic development.

      Socially, Politically, and Culturally Conscious Videos: Sum of Change

      by Rusty5329 on Mon Jul 18, 2011 at 07:06:58 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site