Skip to main content

Truth is, former oil man and now Republican Congressman Trent Franks, who's definitely in the running for the looniest congressman from the looniest state, can link any topic to abortion. In the mid-80s Franks founded the Arizona Family Research Institute, the local version of Dobson's Focus on the Family. He was elected to the state legislature in 1984 running primarily on one issue: abortion. When Franks was elected to the US House in 2002, he arrived in DC with one goal: overturn Roe v Wade, and his entire tenure has been devoted to doing just that.

This spring during the Planned Parenthood debate, when Senator Kyl was citing statistics that were "not intended to be factual statements," Congressman Franks said Planned Parenthood "kills children for profit." And remember this old ditty, when he told African American families that abortion is worse than slavery ever was?

Representative Trent Franks, Republican of Arizona, became the latest offender on Friday when he said the high abortion rate among African-Americans has done greater harm to their population than slavery. "Far more of the African-American community is being devastated by the policies of today than were being devastated by policies of slavery." NY Times

Abortion is not his only schtick, of course. He's an equal opportunity dimwit. Franks is "skeptical" about global warming, but not about the grave dangers to civilization if gays and lesbians marry. He never saw an anti-GLBT law he didn't like, and he's the guy, you may recall, who believes Obama should be impeached for no longer supporting the Defense of Marriage Act.

A member of Bachmann's Tea Party Caucus, who of course has signed Grover's pledge, Franks also said the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) should be investigated for planting spies in Congress:

CAIR said it had a particular interest in influencing the judiciary, intelligence and homeland security committees. . . . Mrs. Myrick and Republican Reps. John Shadegg of Arizona, Paul Broun of Georgia and Trent Franks of Arizona called Wednesday for an investigation by the House sergeant-at-arms into whether CAIR was successful in planting congressional interns. Salon

You get the picture. So yesterday on the House floor, Illinois Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. asked Franks about the constitutionality of a balanced budget amendment, focusing his question on the separation of powers. Over the do-hickey is Jackson's question:

If the gentleman from Arizona would share with us how that would work. I’ve heard a number of members come down and talk about the idea, that we’re going to vote on it, that it needs to happen. But at least as I understand it, the interpreter of the Constitution obviously would be the federal courts. In that, if Congress were unable to achieve a balanced budget in any fiscal year, that a lawsuit could be brought under the balanced budget amendment that would throw the process into the federal judiciary, allowing federal judges then to determine what constitutes balance or imbalance. If the gentleman would take some time to share with us, how from his perspective that would work.

Fair enough, good question. The legal eagle Franks said, "I'll take a shot at that," and then he drifted off into his patented rant about activist courts, abortion, and the Holocaust. I would like to transcribe Franks' answer, but I'm afraid my mind would go into spasms trying to follow the alleged logic. Here, though, thanks to some brave transcriber at Political Correction, is Franks' winning conclusion:

You know, every time across the history of humanity, when the German high tribunal injected itself even into the tragedy of the German system, they said that the Jew was 'untermensch,' sub-human, and they took away their personhood, and the tragedy that followed is still one of the darkest stains on the human soul that I know of. And so yes, it is possible that the courts could try to intervene in this process and try to distort it. Political Correction

Yes, he said that. I especially like the way the last sentence about the courts logically flows from the preceding comments about Nazis. Watch the whole exchange for yourself:

I'm sure Congressman Jackson was more than satisfied with that insightful answer. The folks over at New Times suggest that Jackson could've given the following response:

Originally posted to Maggie's Farm on Thu Aug 04, 2011 at 12:43 PM PDT.

Also republished by Abortion, Baja Arizona Kossacks, and Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site