This image shows the path Pluto will take during the next two years, as viewed from Earth. You can't see it with the naked eye. And, it doesn't actually move in such a cyclic way. It moves in a smooth orbit around the Sun.

So, why does the path in the image look so strange?

There are two reasons. Pluto is moving toward the lower left in that part of the sky. And, Earth also is moving around the Sun. It as if you were recording the movement of a slow moving object while riding on a merry-go-round. This cyclical apparent motion is due to Parallax, the subject of this part of the Kosmic Distance Ladder series. Follow this link to the first in the series.

More below the squiggle  ⤵

PARALLAX - An Overview of the Effect

To get a conceptual feel for parallax, it will help to view two animations of the effect. The image below is linked to a segment of an astronomy course by Terry Harter at Cornell. Click on it to load a Java page that animates the motions. It might take a few moments to load. Several controls are available as noted on the web page. The distance to a nearby stationary star is adjustable by dragging it. The important point here is that the farther an object is, the less pronounced is the parallax motion. Another important point is that the motions are greatly exaggerated. Actual stars are much farther away than in this simulation.

The next image is linked to a graphic at the European Space Agency. It has a distance control and also allows you to see the smaller parallax effect with greater distances. Again, motions are greatly exaggerated.

The Distance Argument

As promised in part 1 of this series, I will attempt to keep this very conceptual. For those who want to know more details about the mathematical derivation involving radians, parsecs, degrees of arc, etc, click on the graphic below.

The diagram shows a triangle taken from part of the geometry of the Earth-Sun-Star arrangement. One side is the Earth-Sun distance of 1 Astronomical Unit (AU). Another side is the distance to the star (D). And, there is a small angle theta (θ). This angle theta is a very, very small value. For small angles, the value of theta equals the ratio of the side opposite to the side adjacent to theta. In other words, theta  =  1 AU/D.  Rearranged, the distance to the nearby star is calculated as follows.  D  =  1 AU/theta    That seems quite simple. For detail, click the graphic.

Today, we know the value of 1 AU to high precision and accuracy. Getting a measure of the angular parallax shift theta is quite a difficult challenge. Looking at the Pluto image at the top shows a lot of angular shift side to side. Pluto is 'close'. Theta is large. For stars, theta is incredibly small. The closest star is Proxima Centauri. It has a parallax angle theta larger than any other star. The value of theta is 0.75 arcseconds. For comparison, the width of the Moon is about 1800 arcseconds. Telescopic measurements of parallax are small and only yield useful values and distance calculations for a few hundred stars in our neighborhood near the Sun.

In 2013, the ESA European Space Agency, plans to launch the Gaia spacecraft. More stars will be measured with unprecedented accuracy.

OBJECTIVES:
To create the largest and most precise three dimensional chart of our Galaxy by providing unprecedented positional and radial velocity measurements for about one billion stars in our Galaxy and throughout the Local Group.

Main Sequence Fitting

The method of parallax does not get us distance values very far into our Milky Way neighborhood. The next range of distance can be found using Main Sequence Fitting. First, a little introduction to the H-R Diagram. H-R is Hertzsprung-Russell.

In the early 20th century, scientists reasoned that if all stars were alike, the most luminous ones would be the hottest. And, those with the same luminosity would have equal temperatures.

In 1911, Ejnar Hertzsprung (Denmark), plotted a graph of star’s magnitudes against their color. Independently in 1913, Henry Russell (USA), constructed a plot of stars’ magnitudes against their spectral class, confirming that indeed, there did seem to be some sort of relationship between a star’s luminosity and its temperature, and the stars fell into distinct groups. Such a plot was thereafter named the Hetzsprung-Russell or H-R diagrams.

Star Clusters

Clusters of stars in distant parts of the galaxy are assumed to have formed from the same cloud of gas and dust, and are at the same distance from us. Their colors and therefore temperatures can be observed. Their place on the temperature scale of the H-R diagram can be plotted. Now, suppose the Y-axis of the H-R is labeled with magnitude. Magnitude is how bright an object looks to an observer. Apparent magnitude is what you actually see. Absolute magnitude is what you would see if the stars were all placed the same distance from you. More specifically, absolute magnitude equals the apparent magnitude an object would have if it were at a standard distance of 10 parsec (32.6 light-yrs) away from the observer.

Distant clusters of stars would have apparent magnitudes less than their absolute magnitudes. The plotted points lie below the red line plot of absolute magnitudes. Think of it this way in terms of car headlights. The farther away the car, the dimmer the apparent brightness of the headlights. This difference in magnitude is judges by your brain to give you a sense of the distance to the car. In astronomy, the light must be measured carefully. But the principle is the same. The difference in magnitudes is used to calculate a distance to the cluster of stars. More details here.

Open clusters have been known since prehistoric times. The Pleiades (M45), the Hyades and the Beehive or Praesepe (M44) are the most prominent examples. Ptolemy had also mentioned the Coma Star Cluster as early as 138 AD.  First thought to be nebulae, it was Galileo in 1609 who discovered that they are composed of stars while observing Praesepe (M44).  As open clusters are often bright and easily observable with small telescopes, many of them were discovered with the earliest telescopes.

Main sequence fitting can determine distances for star clusters within our Milky Way. To reach distances farther out, other methods must be used.

What Method is Next?

The next rung on the Kosmic Distance Ladder uses the class of stars known as Cepheid Variables. As their name implies, they are not constant, but vary in luminosity. How can you tell how far away something is if it doesn't shine a constant amount. The secret is in it's variability.

Watch for the next diary post. I hope to see you then.

#### Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
 Unpublish Diary (The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.) Delete Diary (The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

#### Comment Preferences

• ##### Tip Jar(23+ / 0-)

I'd rather not know, than have answers that are wrong - R.Feynman

• ##### The "strange" apparent orbits of the outer planets(9+ / 0-)

was observed by astronomers before they understood them.  The Ptolemaics, who believed the earth was the center of the universe, had to deal with this "retrograde motion" of the planets, little curlicues in the orbits, not perfect circles.  Very disturbing to everyone and  the math complex.  We now attribute the observed irregularity to parallax, thanks to a revolutionary genius who reordered the universe with the sun in the center.  Thank you, Copernicus.

Sunday mornings are more beautiful without Meet the Press.

• ##### Yes, we've come a long way.(6+ / 0-)

What you describe is well illustrated in the following link.

Switch points of view with the links at the lower right of the screen.

http://dd.dynamicdiagrams.com/...

I'd rather not know, than have answers that are wrong - R.Feynman

[ Parent ]

• ##### Truly beautiful(4+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
jim in IA, x, trashablanca, palantir

but actually I can't see the retrograde motion in that animation.  It can only be seen by an observer standing on an orbiting planet and viewing the outer planets.

The Ptolemaics, trying to hold onto their ancient system into the age of Christianity had a hard time explaining imperfect motion created by a perfect divinity.  They constructed orbital spheres around other orbital spheres, valiantly holding on.  Interestingly, their system was not disproved.  It was superceded by Copernicus' more elegant theory.

Wonderful diary, btw.

Sunday mornings are more beautiful without Meet the Press.

[ Parent ]

• ##### You can see the retrograde motion with...(4+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
x, deben, trashablanca, palantir

the controls in the upper right corner of the screen.

I'd rather not know, than have answers that are wrong - R.Feynman

[ Parent ]

• ##### Didn't see the controls til you pointed them out(4+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
jim in IA, trashablanca, x, palantir

Even cooler and more beautiful.  The perspective, though, that shows parallax (retrograde motion) best is from the planet in orbit.  This animation is from an observer seeing the whole solar system from a fixed point outside of it.  The apparent backwards motion of the outer planets as seen from earth is due to our platform (Earth) moving to opposite sides of the sun.

This is such fun stuff.  It must have driven the Terracentric astronomers loony.

Sunday mornings are more beautiful without Meet the Press.

[ Parent ]

• ##### Always enjoyable - thanks!(5+ / 0-)

Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary? . . . and respect the dignity of every human being.

• ##### Thanks. I'm always glad to see you stop in.(6+ / 0-)

A variation could be "Ignorance is bliss".

I'd rather not know, than have answers that are wrong - R.Feynman

[ Parent ]

• ##### better to have known unknown than misknown knowns.(6+ / 0-)

Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary? . . . and respect the dignity of every human being.

[ Parent ]

• ##### ooh (3+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
jim in IA, Wee Mama, palantir

leave that to Rumsfeld ... it is so confusing :)

On the Hide-rated (HR) diagram, which is appropriately seldom seen, diarist, a question:

I can understand how the Main Line - once you have it -  can be used to estimate distance for a new set of stars. But how was it constructed in the first place? somehow I cant see that explanation in your text, do I overlook something?

initially, people had only apparent magnitudes to work with? How does one know true magnitude from that?

• ##### Briefly....(5+ / 0-)

Stars of known distance, such as in a cluster, were photographically analyzed for spectrum and temperature and luminosity. Patterns emerged for the stars fitting the most common types.

These links can add more. And some kos friends can probably chime in on this.

http://www.leosondra.cz/...

http://cas.sdss.org/...

Help is always appreciated...Jim

I'd rather not know, than have answers that are wrong - R.Feynman

[ Parent ]

• ##### ah thank you(4+ / 0-)
Collaboration is one of the most important aspects of science.
From the cas/sdss thingy

that is so true and so overlooked. I work in a private R&D department of a very big company and you can tell that most of the people in there have no clue how to do science just from this little thing - that they rather fight over territorialities than cooperate, even though all our salaries ultimately depend on cooperation.

(truth be told, I recall horrendous noncooperation from the universities as well .. but the good research that I did see was indeed nearly always born and brought to fruit in collaboration. At least it was that way ... people have told me that the sciences have changed dramatically in the last decade or two.

As a classroom teacher, collaboration was always a good way to work. And, the kids got to see how effective it was. Ideas and difficult concepts could be presented in ways to reach more students.

Thanks for stopping...

I'd rather not know, than have answers that are wrong - R.Feynman

[ Parent ]

• ##### Ooh, I love this stuff. n/t(4+ / 0-)

GSA Making your School a Hate-Free Zone

• ##### Excellent jim! (1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:
Regina in a Sears Kit House

Loved it. Sorry it took so long for me to get to it. Work and play runs on until late evening.

• ##### No problem. I saw your note on...(0+ / 0-)

the queue list earlier. Thanks for the support.

Later... Jim

I'd rather not know, than have answers that are wrong - R.Feynman

[ Parent ]