Skip to main content

At long last, mainstream media begins to pay attention to the flat denial of basic climate science being pushed by rightwing Republican Presidential candidates. Last year, my work on the Climate Zombies earned me, coming from "even leftier Daily Kos," a snippet on a New York Times blog, while most mainstream media ran stories presenting climate science as something deserving two sides.

Things have changed, as the media realize that people who deny climate science also deny other scientific reality.

Politifact finally took on a claim by a Republican candidate for President on his claim that "scientists disagree about global warming," and found it false.

Tim Pawlenty to the Miami Herald:

Q: There is a strong case for man-made climate change, according to a University of Miami climate researcher I’ve spoken to. You don’t agree with him?

Pawlenty: “There’s lots of layers to it. But at least as to any potential man-made contribution to it, it’s fair to say the science is in dispute. There’s a lot of people who say the majority of the scientists think this way. And there’s a minority that way. And you count the number of scientists versus the quality of scientists and the like. But I think it’s fair to say that, as to whether and how much – if any – is attributable to human behavior, there’s dispute and controversy over it…..

Pawlenty's response piqued Politifact's interest.

We divided Pawlenty’s answer into his two essential claims:  

  • Evidence points toward climate change being primarily a natural, rather than man-made, phenomenon.

  • The science about the causes of global climate change is in dispute.

...To summarize: Based on our research, there is very little dispute in the scientific community, especially among climate specialists, on whether climate change is primarily caused by natural or man-made forces. The overwhelming majority of scientists polled feel that human activity is the primary driver of climate change. Also, based on scientific studies by the IPCC and others, global warming over the past 50 years has been primarily driven by human activity.

It's good that Politifact called out Pawlenty. However, he's since quit the Presidential race. Yesterday, both Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry shambled into climate zombie-ism.

Bachmann calls climate change manufactured science

And Perry calls global warming an unproven, costly theory, repeating Pawlenty's false claims that climate change is natural and that many scientists question the theory.

Doubling down on the stupid, Perry claims that climate scientists manipulate data to get grant money, never mind the$11 million he's collected from oil and gas companies, and further claims that complying with anti-carbon programs will cost "billions of dollars," never mind the$35 billion on weather disasters in the first eight months of 2011.

To its credit, the Washington Post Fact Checker gives Perry's made-up facts a Four Pinocchios rating.

Now that Politifact has spoken, will the mainstream media call out Bachmann and Perry for repeating obviously false facts? Or will their statements be presented as one legitimate side of a two-sided debate?

Originally posted to Climate Hawks on Thu Aug 18, 2011 at 08:18 AM PDT.

Also republished by Science Matters.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site