Skip to main content

After reading Hunter's Open Thread for Night Owls post, last night, I began thinking about the goals of immigrantphobes and isolationists like William Gheen.

What are the prospects for a country that closes its borders, restricts immigration, contact and trade with outsiders, and promotes ethnic or cultural homogeneity?

If modern history is any guide, not very appealing.

At the turn of the 20th Century, prospects for Korea were, finally, looking up a little. The defeat of China by Japan in the First Sino-Japanese War had left the kingdom nominally independent, though actually more or less a vassal state of Japan.

The Japanese, however, were not as interested in occupying the peninsula so much as keeping it out of Chinese hands and influence. To that end, they poured resources into the country, encouraging development and technological progress of the sort that had allowed the Meiji emperor, Mutsuhito, to modernize Japan's armed forces and industrial base. The Japanese believed that a modern, developed Korea would serve as a bulwark against Chinese expansion.

From the end of the war, through the period of direct Japanese control beginning in 1910, up to the end of World War II, the city of Pyongyang, called Heijō by the Japanese, developed rapidly, growing from a city of 40,000 to over 250,000 by 1938. It was the industrial powerhouse of the peninsula, while the southern part of the country remained a sleepy, agricultural backwater.

After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the North, under Soviet control, became Provisional North Korea, soon officially organized as the Democratic People's Republic of North Korea we know today. In 1950, the army of the North, backed by the Soviet Union and the relatively new People's Republic of China, invaded the South, with the goal of capturing the traditional capital of Seoul and unifying the country under communist rule. That effort was stalemated, due to intervention on the side of the South by the United States, leading to the current divided peninsula.

Following the Soviet and Chinese models, North Korea closed its borders and severely limited trade and contact with the non-communist world. Its citizens were not to be exposed to decadent, foreign influences, even those of its cousins in the South.

Now, sixty years on, North Korea is a failed agricultural backwater, unable to feed itself, the epitome of a failed state. Nothing better illustrates the difference between the two Koreas than this night satellite image of the peninsula from GlobalSecurity.org:

Similar contrasts between open and closed societies can be found in other postwar pairs--the Germanies and the Chinas (Shanghai and Taiwan being considered, for purpose of discussion, as a single, "open" country; I know they were not one country).

This isn't an essay on the evils of communism or the blessings of unbridled capitalism and trade, merely a cautionary tale about closed societies. I certainly don't subscribe to P.J. O'Rouke's theory that the way to prevent conflict between countries is to plant McDonalds in every one.

We have an obligation to our citizens to be cautious about the effects of development and trade, but, overall, people in open societies tend to live longer, healthier, happier lives than those who do not. With increased security and satisfaction, people in open societies tend to have fewer children, always a plus for a planet overburdened with our ever-hungry selves.

This country's history of welcoming immigrants, embracing new ideas and diverse views, has been the source of our growth and strength for over two centuries, and this openness is essential to our survival and continuing prosperity in the future.

So, when you hear the sputterings of xenophobes who would slam our doors and minds to the new, the foreign, the other, ask them which side of the DMZ they would prefer to live on.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site