Skip to main content

Every time the political season hits full-swing, I am always curious about how much political advertising I will see between the national network news and Jeopardy! (my 5:30-6:30pm routine). Nothing cracks me up like seeing Jeopardy! go to break and then seeing 5 of 6 ad spots be political purchases. Normally it's a predictable routine of Dem for Senate, Rep for Senate, DCCC, NRCC, and then maybe an ad for a local car dealer.

In 2008, I noticed for the first time that the ad breaks lacked any non-political ads. From the touching personal-interest story that finished the news to the first round of Jeopardy!, all I heard was how big of loser some politician was or how big of a fool I was for supporting taxing oil and gas (because they were sure to just shove it right back up me in increased rates).

2010 was worse. And today I have discovered why the volumn of the noise went up so much over the last two election cycles: Indepedent campaign financing increase 68 fold from 2006 to 2010 in the state of Colorado. From less than $400k in 2006 to over $25million in 2010, the Citizens United v.  FEC ruling paved the way for third parties to take over the campaign funding process. And in 2010, third party fundraising eclipsed contributions to candidate campaigns $25.7m to $19.8m, respectively.

Following this trend, it appears the nightly news is set to get bumped off the air in favor of non-stop messages coming straight from some quasi-identifiable political action committee that wants to tell me all about how my favorite candidate kicks dogs when he's not raping children.

It looks like Follow the Money is rolling out state-by-state reports right now. Arizona, Alaska, Colorado and Texas' reports are out now and available here:

Let's all savor the hell out of this football season (woes of the Broncos, Buffs and Rams aside) - next year's season is going to be filled with political noise. With the money that will be available in 2012, I see the super-imposed campaign ads pasted onto the end of the First & 10 line now. . .

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  What Better Proof Of the Free Speech Fundies' (0+ / 0-)

    faith-based talking point could there be: that the best answer to bad speech is more speech!

    68 times more speech! Are we free yet?

    We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for victims of our nation and for those it calls enemy.... --ML King "Beyond Vietnam"

    by Gooserock on Wed Aug 31, 2011 at 12:39:54 PM PDT

  •  the major problem (0+ / 0-)

    now that corporations can use unlimited amounts of money for political slush funds, thanks to five of the most corrupt Supreme Court non-Justices in American history (Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Roberts & Kennedy in their Citizens United abomination/decision/in-kind contribution to the Republican Party), one of the major problems in combating this outrage is that, by the time people find out, it's too late or they probably won't care any more.

    Here it is nearly a year since massive amounts of corporate political slush money was used to out-and-out purchase control of the House of Representatives, and we're getting around to learning exactly how much money was spent in this one state.

    We need to become more aggressive in pointing how to the American public how these corporate political slush funds are being used to corrupt our political system.

    Thanks for reporting this.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site