Skip to main content


Rick Perry’s donors fare well, Texas-style
by Carol D. Leonnig, WashingtonPost.com -- Sep 1, 2011

[...]
[Perry] also will have to deal with mounting criticism that his administration has rewarded large donors with favors that have enhanced their personal and business interests. Public interest groups contend that the linkage is too strong to be explained by the business-friendly climate that Perry has worked hard to create.

“Perry has taken it to a whole new level,” said Public Citizen’s director in Texas, Tom Smith said.  [a $102 million level.]

[...]
Twenty-three donors won Perry’s appointment to state boards, often the boards of regents at the University of Texas or Texas A&M.

Roughly one in three of the top Perry donors had business interests that secured grants, tax subsidies or project approvals under his administration, the Post review found. Five donors gained both an appointment and a state boost to their specific company or interests.
[...]


What's a little Quid-pro-Quo, between a State Executive and their Donors?

I guess it depends on, which State ... and which Party, you're governing from ...

IOKIYAR, and if you're from Texas too, apparently.



If you're a Democrat, you HAD better mind your P's and Q's ...


Don Siegelman Appeal: Court Affirms Conviction On Most Counts
By Jeralyn, Section Corruption Cases, talkleft.com -- Mar 06, 2009

[...]
The three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals was unanimous in ruling that there was enough evidence to convict Mr. Siegelman of bribery for having appointed a campaign contributor to a state hospital licensing board  

[...] First, the bribery related counts and what they charged:

The bribery statute under which defendants were convicted makes it a crime for a state official to corruptly agree to accept anything of value from another person “intending to be influenced” in that person’s favor in an official action. 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B)

I wonder if that includes:  "anything of value from another [Corporate] person" ?


If you don't know the Don Siegelman story, it was/is a true travesty of Justice, and a sign of the times we live in ... in a post-accountability America:

The Strange Case of an Imprisoned Alabama Governor
by Adam Cohen, NYTimes.com -- Sep 10, 2007


Well the current "Pro-Corporate" Supreme Court, gave Governor Don Siegelman a temporary "Get-out-of-Jail-Free" Card.  But I really don't think it was the "good governor" that they were trying to assist ...

Supreme Court Vacates Don Siegelman Conviction
by David Dayen, FDL -- June 29, 2010

The Supreme Court ruling Skilling v. United States narrowed the definition of “honest services fraud,” which had implications for a host of public corruption cases. Generally speaking, progressive court watchers saw that as a bad thing. But many of the trumped-up cases in the Bush era hinged on the same statute, and thus, the Supreme Court vacated the ruling in one of them, sending the case of Don Siegelman back to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. [...]


So it's OK if a Republican bribes returns "honest services" to dozens of large Campaign donors

-- but if a Democrat does it, in a "pro-forma" routine appointment -- for one supporter -- Then it's the Big House for you!


Just ask Don Siegelman how he feels about the state of the Justice System in America ...

While you're at it, ask some of Rick Perry's many, many appointees, as well. I suspect they will give you their standard Pro-Business answer.  Something about "Everything being bigger in Texas -- even the Political Favors!"


original photo source link




EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site