Skip to main content

We all operate in self-interest, as doing so, helps to ensure (we hope) our survival. Whether it be one person or a group of people, self-interest drives the equation. Therefore, a group, That Can Be Known As (TCBKA) a body of government officials can qualify. Also, a group of people TCBKA a body of corporate employees can qualify. In addition, a group of people TCBKA a loosely-bound body of "citizens" can qualify. These groups are not mutually exclusive. How do these groups interact?

What are the dependencies between these groups? We know that the citizen group depends on the gov't group. We know that the gov't group depends on the corporate group. And we know that the corporate group depends on the gov't group. See the problem here? Nobody depends on the citizen group! Some might say that the gov't group depends on the citizen group to get elected. I would respond that is an illusion. Between the fuel of money and the downright corruption in the electoral process, the vote is an illusion. Think of an opiate drug.

What's gonna happen under such a scenario?

1. The citizen group lobbies the gov't group and tries to make it's voice heard by media and demonstrations. End result = gov't group takes little notice, and no wonder as it does not see any dependency for survival there.
2. Corporate group lobbies gov't group. End result = gov't group very responsive and asks for money for their survival. (we're talking BIG money here, not citizen group donations)
3. Corporate group pays money to gov't group and extracts payback promises. End result = corporate group gets legislation they want.
4. Citizen group follows perceived rules thereby voting someone to the gov't group. End result = they are deceived into thinking that they voted in someone that is dependent on their group.
5. Citizen group is dissatisfied with previous gov't group member that they voted for. End result = they vote in a different person to gov't group and have the same result as number 4.
6. Corporate group works with any member of gov't group since they know gov't group is dependent on corporate group. End result = cycle continues and citizen group is duped into thinking that gov't group is dependent on them.

What's the conclusion from this scenario?

The citizen group is trying to influence the WRONG group.

Members of the citizen group spend all their time thinking they can have an impact on the gov't group, which they perceive to be the group that affects their lives. (It does, but not in a positive way) The citizen group needs to affect the corporate group, as it is that group that every member of any other groups are directly or indirectly affected by.

The threat that every member of the citizen group is under is directly caused by members of the corporate group. (corporate group here means the people that really benefit financially from being members of this group, i.e. not your average corporate employee) The members of the citizen group need to start lobbying members of the corporate group, i.e. their world headquarters, where ever they are to bring pressure on this group. Incessant picketing, done from public land, boycotting of their products and the media they support is where the energy of the citizen group must be directed to have any effect. Hitting the money (the bottom line) of the corporate group is where the power of the citizen group lies. The citizen group cannot expect to ever compete on a money basis with the corporate group to entice the gov't group to satisfy their needs. Long ago, when the corporate group was relatively insignificant to the citizen group that wasn't true. The dynamics have changed and changed in a huge way. The gov't group merely acts as a buffer between the citizen group and the corporate group. The gov't group has not represented the citizen group for a long time and under the grip of the corporate group will never again. It's not that we need 'more and better democrats', it's that we need 'more responsive and better corporations'.

If you made it this far, thanks for reading.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kevinpdx, tardis10, MadRuth, bunsk

    The Universe is strange enough, you don't have to add hocus pocus

    by rsie on Sat Sep 03, 2011 at 12:46:19 PM PDT

  •  That's why (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    rsie, bunsk

    The Supreme Court made Corporations people.  It writes real people out of the equation entirely.  Time for torches and pitchforks,

    I could buy a parrot and train it to say, `tax cuts,' but at the end of the day, it's still a parrot, not a conservative.

    by MadRuth on Sat Sep 03, 2011 at 02:54:41 PM PDT

    •  Exactly and that is why (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      we need to deal with those entities and not waste our time and energy on groups that will not change our destiny.

      thanks for your response...very much appreciated

      The Universe is strange enough, you don't have to add hocus pocus

      by rsie on Sat Sep 03, 2011 at 04:30:12 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  the corporate group (0+ / 0-)

    has worked very hard to insulate themselves from citizen action via gov't. Direct action is the only option left. It's an uphill climb since the corporate group controls the media and works to co-opt any new avenues for citizen organization. Efforts to destroy unions and the concept of community organizing, and the focus on individual greed and desire tell a story; they know if we're united, we have the power, so they work their asses off to make sure the people don't know it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site