Skip to main content

There's no better evidence that the stock market has no connection to the lives of Americans than the fact that the Dow has been tanking of late.  As of the close on 9/9/11 it's down about 14% over  2 months.  But in that time it's gone down, then up, and down, and down some more, and in all likelihood has a ways to go before bottoming out.

Has the actual real-world, day-to-day well-being of any group of people except a small number of traders gone down by 14% in the same time span?

Is the market responding to the long-term stagnation of middle class incomes, or to unemployment, or to food prices, or to life expectancy?  Not that I know of.  It's been responding to abstractions, largely related to the debt of European nations and banks.

In a previous post I started discussing the idea of the DOM(estic) index: the DOW upside down.  It's an attempt at a less-bad daily measure of the health of the United States.  It's a daunting task, one with no clear right or wrong answers.  We can consider many different realms---sub-indexes of the main index that cover areas such as energy, health, employment, food, etc.  These sub-indexes would then be combined to produce a single index.  Because each topic is large in and of itself, I'd like to start today with energy, and then consider the others in subsequent posts.

Not to give away the plan early, but our goal is to set up a database and a ticker that can be used by anyone on any other site to display the day's DOM index (and maybe its sub-indexes).  But first we need to develop the concept a bit more fully.  Adam and I have considered 30-40 metrics (everything from the price of oil to weekly unemployment claims to pesticide use to median air quality) that might be important to include in the index.  Combining them meaningfully will be difficult, but we need to start somewhere.

First we should consider the goals that I spelled out before:

  1. To sever the false sense of connection between the stock market and general well-being.
  2. To provide a tight feedback loop between the metric(s) used and the levers used to change the system.

I'd argue that goal 1 is on its way to being achieved simply due to the financial crisis and its aftermath.  To address goal 2, we will aim, when we have a choice, to select frequently-updated data sources over infrequent (if less noisy) alternatives.

I should state an assumption we make: we assume we're at the end of economic growth as it is currently measured.  (There is substantial evidence for this, as both the data and the reasoning indicate.)  That means that while we hope to back-calculate the DOM for dates in the past (really as far back as we can get data), I can imagine that it won't be meaningful in those different eras.  Times like the late 1990s seemed great in many ways: low unemployment, strong economic growth, little military conflict, etc.  Yet in many ways it was setting us up for hard times to come: carbon emissions were rising at record rates, millions were without health care, the last plentiful oil fields (e.g. the North Sea) were near peak, etc.  In designing the index, we need to balance metrics that measure present well-being with those that are indicative of future well being.  That is, we need to stop discounting the future.  This adds a complicating factor: some (many?) short-term negatives may be long-term positives.  For example, decreasing oil consumption in a recession is due to a short-term economic negative (in conventional thinking), not due to any desire to save energy; however, this enables a more graceful descent (if the goal isn't to ramp up growth immediately after the recession).

So to consider energy, we can look at a few different types of metrics: total consumption of various forms of energy, total available energy (either as reserves for fossil fuel sources or capacity for alternative sources), energy return on investment (EROI), side effects of that energy production/consumption, future estimates for energy availability, and meta-metrics such as the rates of change or per-capita values for these.  One difficult that arises immediately, that we found is the case for many of the metrics we'd like to use, is that the data is reported sporadically and with high variability, making it difficult to easily reflect changes in a daily metric.  The straightforward approach that we plan on using initially is to compute moving averages of the metrics over some period of time, as appropriate for the data source.

Here are several metrics we have considered including in the energy sub-index (with links to data sources for the ones for which we have good sources):

In this, I view high prices as a negative (because it impacts people who, like it or not, still use energy) but view decreased consumption that results from those high prices as a positive (because it is more sustainable in the long term).  In this, the goal is to let the data determine what's positive and negative rather than trying to reason about it directly.

That rounds up the energy sub-index metrics.  I'd be interested in hearing about any others that would be valuable to include (and how you envision including them).  I'll continue with several other of the sub-indexes in a subsequent post.

Until next time...

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I would consider adding the price of water (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    barath, maybeeso in michigan, alizard

    into your calculations.  One reason is it is a necessary commodity and becoming pricier and more at risk of pollution, scarcity and privatization.  Some cities in AZ have doubled and tripled the price of water in the last couple years.  Many small water companies have already been acquired by private interests, and I think more will in the near future.

  •  How about the transition to Alt-E (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    barath, Eugene Fitzherbert, alizard

    If we don't transition to renewable energy sources, and quickly, the term economic recovery will never be used again.  I view this as a critical metric.  Every attempt at economic recovery (including this jobs program) will quickly get cut off by rapidly rising fossil fuel and other rapidly depleting critical natural resource prices.

    And of course, Global Warming!  We're in the same kind of critical window to reduce our CO2 emissions.  If we fail at this, your index, the DOW, and all other indexes will be meaningless to a civilization that has devolved to 12th century serfdom.

  •  happiness index (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    economic indices such as GDP, GNP etc. do not measure what is important to most people.  For example, someone in ill health and pain spending vast amounts of money on medical treatment contributes much more to the GNP than someone blissfully sitting on their assets out in the woods. A national happiness index would include measures of health and well-being such as exercise, outdoor time, leisure time, self assessments of contentment, etc.

    Scientific Materialism debunked here

    by wilderness voice on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 12:10:28 PM PDT

  •  Great Diary, Barath - thanks. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I've long thought that we need a more holistic set of economic indicators.  The Dow Jones and the other traditional barometers basically tell us how much some schmuck hedge fund operator made yesterday.  I'd rather know how much topsoil we have left on the midwestern farms, how our kids are doing in school, whether or not our water is drinkable, and how many people have access to decent healthcare.  Those issues all have profound economic implications.

    Regulate banks, not bedrooms

    by Eagleye on Sat Sep 10, 2011 at 02:24:25 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site