Skip to main content

Conference on the Constitutional Convention (ConConCon) will be happening at Harvard Law School this coming weekend, and you'd have thought that we might not have waited for like 220 years to get even this far. But, then again, amending The Constitution used to be possible, like adding States and growing The Nation once was, but both of those things pretty much stopped pretty early in my lifetime.

We got fat, we got sassy, and we got lazy. Not that anything this complicated ever is really that simplistic, but please don't underestimate the importance of the connection. After I stumbled into a life as a "Major Marijuana Offender" (according to the government in both my PreSentence Investigation Report, and on the Wanted Poster (I swear to god) circulated when I became a fugitive for a time), and while I was still gainfully employed as such, I was blessed with visiting The Third World often (and I can't stress how much it pains me that the title is almost as relevant today as it was 30-40 years ago when I first discovered the reality that life so grim existed on a paralell with our own relative opulence). Mexico, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Thailand, Belize, Panama, Cayman Islands, Curacao, Aruba, St. Maarten, St. Thomas, Tortola, Haiti, Dominican Republic, too many places in the Bahamas to count. And now so many of these places have something, and so many of our people really, really want to cry.

It doesn't surprise me at all that the poor dumb suckers on the right hate life, and have no real interest in challenging the real powers that be. What are they going to do, admit both that no part of the power system we have now really works like they are being assured by BUSHCO/Koch that it does, and face the fact that they have been completly defrauded on this whole "original intent" thing?

But what about the left? Why are we so afraid to stand face on against the clear challenges that are moving inexorably towards us? Pretty much everything we're doing today fails because the original design was simply insufficient for our times. What once started out pure has long since been perverted, polluted, co-opted, or otherwise. And peoples around the planet who should be our allies in this struggle are selling their futures for pennies on the dollar while we content ourselves with trying to minimize our losses because we're too afraid to even try anything else.


From their web site:

Democracy in America is stalled.
From the Right and the Left, citizens are increasingly coming to recognize that our Republic does not work as our Framers intended. Reform of any kind is stalled by a status quo that profits from blocking change. No side in the political debate benefits from this inertia.

The Framers created a method for escaping from captured government—an Article V Constitutional Convention. If two-thirds of the states pass resolutions calling for a convention, then all sides will have the opportunity to argue for the changes they believe will restore our Republic. Any amendment proposed must then be ratified by three fourths of the states to become law.

On September 24th, people from across America and across the political spectrum will convene at Harvard University to discuss the advisability and feasibility of organizing towards a Constitutional Convention. The conference's lead organizers are both proponents and opponents of an Article V convention and we actively encourage the participation of those who support a convention and those who oppose holding a convention at all.

Lawrence Lessig and Mark Meckler will co-chair the conference. Lawrence Lessig is the director of the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University and the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. He co-founded Change Congress, which aims to reduce the influence of private money in American politics. For more, see "How to sober up Washington"—an essay by Lessig and Mark McKinnon on corruption in Washington, voters' disillusionment, and the need for an Article V convention. Mark Meckler is the Co-Founder and a National Coordinator for Tea Party Patriots (along with his Co-Founder and fellow National Coordinator, Jenny Beth Martin), the largest grassroots tea party organization in the nation with over 3,500 chapters spanning every state.

And then:

Has a Constitutional Convention ever been held?
Not since the Constitution was written in 1787. But they've almost happened since—for instance, by 1910 nearly two-thirds of states had called for a Constitutional convention to propose that United States Senators be directly elected. (They were previously appointed by state legislatures.) This compelled Congress to put forth the 17th amendment, which was ratified in 1913 and established the current mode of choosing U.S. Senators.

Are you worried about a runaway convention?
Some raise concerns about the possibility of a "runaway" convention, whereby large swaths of the Constitution would be overturned in a unthinking frenzy driven by overzealous conventioneers. But the Constitution makes it clear that changes suggested by a Constitutional Convention would not take effect unless ratified by three-fourths of states, most likely via passage by those states' legislatures, so as few as 13 of America's 99 state legislative chambers could block an amendment that is too extreme. Only those amendments that are able to achieve a very high threshold of support would stand a chance of ratification.

This is the same way in which amendments offered by Congress, through the more familiar process, would be ratified: In many respects Congress can be considered a standing Constitutional Convention. It's when Congress is intransigent because the interests of Congressmembers themselves are in question—when, say, we want to change the campaign finance laws by which Congressmembers get elected—that we must empower ordinary citizens to force the changes we need.

Amending the Constitution is a reckless move. Why are you rushing into an Article V convention?
The purpose of this conference is not to call a convention. The purpose is to have a conversation about how such a convention would work and whether it would be a wise decision. Many of the conference's participants—perhaps the majority—believe that an Article V convention should not be called.

Will there be a live webcast? Will you post videos afterward?
Yes, there will be a live webcast at We'll also have tools for remote participation. If you're on Twitter, Flickr, or other social media sites, you can tag your posts with the hashtag #conconcon. After the conference, we'll post videos online as soon as they're ready.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)

    There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

    by oldpotsmuggler on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 07:16:42 PM PDT

  •  A Constitutional convention? (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Horace Boothroyd III, doc2, Whimsical

    Now there's a good idea.  Not.

    "Faced with what is right, to leave it undone shows a lack of courage." - Confucius

    by IndieGuy on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 07:23:57 PM PDT

    •  Really! So things are working out real great where (0+ / 0-)

      you live, I guess.

      So, let me ask you this. With everything so wonderful right now, just what is it that you're afraid to lose?

      Becasue it sure as hell ain't freedom, democracy, or what used to be thought of as "The American Way of Life"! You should have noticed that you already kissed them goodbye a few years back. (And please read above again if you feel any temptation to read any right wing conotation into any of this.)

      There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

      by oldpotsmuggler on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 08:19:20 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  The bathwather may be mucky (0+ / 0-)

        But I'm not prepared to throw out the baby with it, thanks.

        "The future of man is not one billion of us fighting over limited resources on a soon-to-be dead planet. . .I won't go back into the cave for anyone."

        by Whimsical on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 09:32:00 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  I'll Be There (0+ / 0-)

    Don't expect much and think a real Constitutional Convention at this time would be suicide but it looks like an interesting experiment.

    Solar is civil defense. Video of my small scale solar experiments at solarray.

    by gmoke on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 08:00:02 PM PDT

    •  Why is it that open minded folks are so hard to (0+ / 0-)

      find on this site? I notice that it didn't hurt you a bit to see if there is anything for you to learn in all of this. Thanks.

      There can be no protection locally if we're content to ignore the fact that there are no controls globally.

      by oldpotsmuggler on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 08:22:40 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  A convention would be great for the (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Whimsical, trueblueliberal

    Tea Party. For liberals, not so much. But the point is moot, there is a zero point zero chance that any such thing is going to happen.

    Don't tread on me? I'll tread on you any time I feel like it.

    by doc2 on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 08:17:11 PM PDT

  •  Just a heads up: (0+ / 0-)

    Recently, discussing an "Article V Constitutional Convention" was established as a bannable offense at Daily Kos.

    However, you will discover from the comments here why this is so highly resisted and reactive:

    Americans are terrified of themselves and each other as a people.

  •  Damn. And here I thought you (0+ / 0-)

    were talking about the upcoming "Leverage" convention.

    Oh well.

    "The future of man is not one billion of us fighting over limited resources on a soon-to-be dead planet. . .I won't go back into the cave for anyone."

    by Whimsical on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 09:28:32 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site