Skip to main content

One of the most frustrating things about being a liberal is watching Democrats constantly let the Republicans frame the terms of the debate.  The Republican strategy of using language to advantageously frame the debate was clearly laid out in Newt Gingrich's GOPAC memo of 1996, in which he described how language is a "key mechanism of control", and listed a set of negative words with which to define Democrats.  "Welfare", "bureaucracy", "taxes", "spending", "unionized", "liberal".  All of these words were meant to be used as weapons by Republicans to attack their Democratic opponents.  What is frustrating as a liberal is having to watch Democrats run from these words, tacitly accepting their negative connotations - accepting that taxes and spending are at best necessary evils, welfare (a term meaning health and happiness) is actually bad, unions are only to be mentioned quietly in primaries, and one must avoid that culture-war term "liberal".

That is why so many of us enjoyed the speech given by Matt Santos, played by Jimmy Smits, on the West Wing.  Santos is the young, charismatic, Democratic nominee for president, whose similarities to Barack Obama were oddly prophetic.  As the NY Times put it:

Santos is a coalition-building Congressional newcomer who feels frustrated by the polarization of Washington. A telegenic and popular fortysomething with two young children, Santos enters the presidential race and eventually beats established candidates in a long primary campaign.

Wearing a flag pin, Santos announces his candidacy by telling supporters, “I am here to tell you that hope is real.” And he adds, “In a life of trial, in a world of challenges, hope is real.” Viewers can almost hear the crowd cheering, “Yes, we can."

In a pivotal presidential debate moment, Santos rejects the dismissive use of the word 'liberal' by the Republican candidate, played by Alan Alda.

Santos: "Republicans have tried to turn the word liberal into a bad word.  Well, liberals ended slavery in this country.

Republican: "A Republican president ended slavery"

Santos: "Yes, a liberal Republican, Senator. What happened to them? They got run out of your party. What did liberals do that was so offensive to the liberal party? I'll tell you what they did. Liberals got women the right to vote. Liberals got African-Americans the right to vote. Liberals created Social Security and lifted millions of elderly people out of poverty. Liberals ended segregation. Liberals passed the Civil Rights Act, the Voting Rights Act. Liberals created Medicare. Liberals passed the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act. What did conservatives do? They opposed them on every one of those things ­ every one. So when you try to hurl that label at my feet, 'Liberal,' as if it were something to be ashamed of, something dirty, something to run away from, it won't work, Senator. Because I will pick up that label and I will wear it as a badge of honor."

Inspiring.  Too bad it's only fiction, right?  While there may have been superficial similarities between Obama and Santos, the new "caver-in-chief" would never draw such a firm distinction between liberals and Republicans, right?

Well it looks like Jon Favreau or someone else in the White House might be a bit of West Wing fan.  Here is Obama's latest line in the battle of taxing the rich vs. the Republican plan of taxing the poor, delivered Wednesday at a Democratic fundraiser:

"Now, you’re already hearing the Republicans in Congress dusting off the old talking points. You can write their press releases. “Class warfare,” they say. You know what? If asking a billionaire to pay the same rate as a plumber or a teacher makes me a warrior for the middle class, I wear that charge as a badge of honor. I wear it as a badge of honor, because the only class warfare I’ve seen is the battle that’s been waged against middle-class folks in this country for a decade now."

(Unfortunately I can only find video hosted by Fox News).

You see what he did there?  Taking this vacuous "class warfare" attack and instead of running from it, embraced the clear distinction that it offered between Democrats and Republicans.  If they really want to fight an election about "class warfare", bring it on.  It's a losing argument for them, but only as long as Democrats fight back.

Of course, there will be the cynics who warn that these are "just words".  Look, i've had my disappointments with Barack Obama, but it seems a little strange to me to criticize the man for not fighting hard enough for the last two and a half years, and yet continue to criticize him now that he's fighting back.  Is it just a cynical ploy to get reelected?  I highly doubt it - it seems pretty clear to me that Obama believes all of this deeply, and that he also knows that he made some major mistakes in his first two years.  From the new Suskind book:

Obama: "The area of my presidency where I think my management and understanding of the presidency evolved the most, and where I think we made the most mistakes, was less on the policy front and more on the communications front... The irony is, the reason I was in this office is because I told a story to the American people.  It wasn't the specifics of my health care plan or Afghanistan.  The reason people put me in this office is people felt I had connected our current predicaments with the broader arc of American history and where we might go as a diverse and forward-looking nation.  And that narrative thread we just lost... I think I was so consumed with the problem in front of me that I didn't step back and remember 'What's the particular requirement of the president that no one else can do?' And what the president can do, that nobody else can do, is tell a story to the American people about where we are and where we are going."

"This job is not about just getting the policy right.  It's about getting the American people to believe in themselves, and in our capacity to act collectively to deliver for the next generation."

"Going forward as a president, the symbols and gestures - what people are seeing coming out of this office - are at least as important as the policies we put forward."

This is, of course, reminiscent of what he said in Wisconsin in February 2008:

"It's true that speeches don't solve all problems, but what is also true is that if we cannot inspire the country to believe again then it doesn't matter how many policies and plans we have, and that is why I am running for President of the United States of America, and that's why we just won eight elections straight.  Because the American people want to believe in change again.  Don't tell me words don't matter"

If we cannot inspire the country to believe in government again, after years of deliberate Republican mismanagement, then it doesn't matter what policies we have as progressives.  So even if these are "just words", they still matter - a lot.

Originally posted to kindofblue on Wed Sep 21, 2011 at 11:50 PM PDT.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  All the rumours I've heard from the village... (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    x, falina, kindofblue that the white house was afraid the Repubs would sink the economy by not raising the debt ceiling.

    Now that the fear is over, they feel freer to move into campaign mode.

    Whatever the case: I'm glad they're finally realizing that attempted compromise was getting them nowhere.

    Ideology is an excuse to ignore common sense.

    by Bush Bites on Thu Sep 22, 2011 at 12:42:31 AM PDT

  •  Man, I'm hoping Favreau is studying (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    falina, AAMOM

    that entire WW season!

    The winner of every Republican debate is Barack Obama. - plf515, DKos 2011

    by CoyoteMarti on Thu Sep 22, 2011 at 01:18:25 AM PDT

  •  I prefer FDR: "...I welcome their hatred." (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Actually, I think this "Santos" quote is based upon a quote from a speech that Franklin Delano Roosevelt made in Madison Square Garden in 1936.

    "For nearly four years you have had an Administration which instead of twirling its thumbs has rolled up its sleeves. We will keep our sleeves rolled up.

    "We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace: business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

    "They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

    "Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me – and I welcome their hatred." (Emphasis added)

    Someone had been reading their history when they wrote that fictional speech by Santos. It was based on the real life politics of FDR.

  •  Lets not forget (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Sarah Palin stealing Liberal talking points by attacking Crony Capitalism and trying to use our popular attacks against the rich to help the rich. The GOP has no new ideas that the American public likes. I expect the Tea Baggers to blame Obama for SS and Medicare cuts very soon.
       They attack the word Liberal to demonize it but ironically they use our ideas.
       I expect the GOP Presidential Nominee to pledge to get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site