If she keeps this up, she can start her own vineyard. This time, our Mother of Martyrs laments that the big bad evil regulatin' President is responsible for her ittle bittle angel pie baby boy having to quit his job. Can I get a sad?
Anita Perry blames Obama for son's job loss
Rick Perry's wife Anita said Friday that she could sympathize with the plight of the unemployed because her son was forced to resign his job to take a more active role on his father's presidential campaign.
Anita Perry blamed the Obama administration for her son having to resign his position.
Everybody: 1, 2, 3 ....AWWWW
Now, why does our Mother of Martyrs think this?
"My son had to resign his job because of federal regulations that Washington has put on us," Mrs. Perry said while campaigning for her husband in South Carolina, after a voter shared the story of losing his job.
"He resigned his job two weeks ago because he can't go out and campaign with his father because of SEC regulations," she continued, referring to the Securities and Exchange Commission. "He has a wife... he's trying to start a business. So I can empathize."
First of all, I'm not sure why Jesus can't provide since Whine-ita says that they're the only deserving people in this race because of being good Christians All Rejoice. But even leaving Jesus out of it ( which I realize Whine-ita can't) isn't it the conservative mantra that sonny should have planned ahead for this eventuality and been independently wealthy enough not to have to worry about having a job or something? I dunno, wingnut logic hurts my head.
"My son lost his job because of this administration," she said a few minutes later.
Mmmmmkay. Of course her "it's all about us" answer was in response to a question from a middle aged voter who lost a six figure job and is now making $12 an hour. Here's your first clue question asker: you're talking to the wrong people if you think they're going to help you get back to where you were.
But back to Whine-ita. Per teh Google, this appears to be the SEC regulation she's referring to :
Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission is adopting a new rule under
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that prohibits an investment adviser from providing advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after the adviser or certain of its executives or employees make a contribution to certain elected officials or candidates. The new rule also prohibits an adviser from providing or agreeing to provide, directly or indirectly, payment to any third party for a solicitation of advisory business from any government entity on behalf of such adviser, unless such third parties are registered broker-dealers or registered investment advisers, in each case themselves subject to pay to play restrictions. Additionally, the new rule prevents an adviser from soliciting from others, or coordinating, contributions to certain elected officials or candidates or payments to political parties where the adviser is providing or seeking government business. The Commission also is adopting rule amendments that require a registered adviser to maintain certain records of the political contributions made by the adviser or certain of its executives or employees. The new rule and rule amendments address “pay to play” practices by investment advisers
which doesn't seem to me to have squat to do with a son campaigning for his father unless they assumed that sonny would be up to no good?