Skip to main content

I don’t like occupying myself with politics very much. It’s a part of life but a relatively minor part for me. If I had my druthers I would and pursue my real love which is art in all its forms. I am attuned and immersed in beauty not politics, business or economic life.  However, political issues have to be front and center for all of us right now.

We are faced with such overwhelming collective issues that no one can stay on the sidelines—we must all carry some weight in the struggles we are facing. The most obvious and critical issue we face is the matter of climate-change. Because the Earth is a very complex system it is hard to arrive at any conclusive finding on what the results of human activity on climate are. In short, the science of any complex system can only be approximate and even then there’s always a possibility that the opposite of what we think is true may be true due to one critical detail we missed in our analysis. Such is the nature of complex systems.

So why be concerned about climate-change? Because to the best of our ability using the latest science and risk-assessment (based on game-theory) techniques we know climate-change presents us with a risk that is clearly and obviously unacceptable. The most likely scenario is that we will, within the next decade, begin a series of positive-feedback loops that will result in catastrophic climate-change that will likely kill perhaps millions of people from the catastrophes and the disorder that will follow. I say that based on the latest science (I’m reading The End of the Long Summer: Why We Must Remake Our Civilization to Survive on a Volatile Earth by Diane Dumanoski) we are in deep shit. It is possible that scientists are missing something—the discovery of some kind of morphic field or some alien force observing us who will step in at the last moment to save us etc., etc. But that’s not the point. In business you act on the basis of your best risk-analysis and there is no way you can come to a different conclusion that catastrophes are more likely to happen than not. This should be obvious after this past year of thousand year floods and extreme and unprecedented events that were predicted by scientists back in the late 1980’s.

As we face this challenge to all of humanity, at the same time, we have a global political establishment that is not reacting at all to the crisis. Some token steps have been taken mainly in Europe but in this country the issue has no resonance at all either with the power-elite or the populace as a whole. As much as climate change is a real threat this tendency of human beings in this culture to ignore the most significant threat we face in favor of some fantasy of a War on Terror show me that the culture we live in is suffering from collective mental illness—I am more certain of that fact than I am certain of a coming period of climate catastrophes.

This is why I often write that the problem is not the oligarchs or capitalism or the political system but the problem is deep within the culture. I will often say that the problem is two-fold:  (1) too much information without the conceptual frameworks needed to digest and make useful the full scope of facts and ideas which results in mass confusion and, frankly psychic trauma on an unprecedented scale—folks, we are in completely and radically different territory here that human beings have never even come close to experiencing before; and (2) a culture of narcissism that is a result of the modern condition and its trauma along with the loss of certainty, traditions and community—also critical is the availability of quick escape valves stemming from  the resulting alienation, i.e., drugs, addictions, consumerism, sex and porno, fantasies, mass entertainment, sports, online virtual life and so on.

To me it kind of irrelevant what kinds of political or economic system we live in when the goal of the culture is to take the blue pill. If our goal in life is to live in comfort (and therefore ignorance) then we are lost and we can leave the Earth to the cockroaches. The critical question for all of us is deeply philosophical and we need to articulate those questions at least to ourselves. Who are we? What do we want to do? What is the meaning of life? Are we or are we not connected to all life (science itself tells us we are all deeply connected to each other on this Earth)? Separation and selfishness is absolutely not just anti-nature but anti-human—we are hard wired to be connected. That humanness must be articulated and championed or we have no basis for any of our political ideas.

To sum up, we must start with a general philosophy of life that is solid and robust or we are building on shifting sands. It is not right to just say about the Wall Street oligarchs that they are bad or that they’re not being fair or whatever.  We must articulate some reason why we see them that way. Why should they not take all the money they can? Why should they share? Just because you say so? If you want to take away their privileges they will fight you and they have the resources to hire armies and most can’t match them in that; we have to appeal to something deeper within them as well as resist them. When we find something deep within us that we know to be solid (to the degree such solidity is even possible) then we come from a position of strength that can prevail over those whose consciousness is more split. For me one of the most vital examples of this is the practice of Aikido—in that Zen-influenced martial arts you concentrate on “one point” which is your center and, at the same time, the center of the universe itself. From that solid place you can do amazing things. For me the greatest solidity has come from embracing mystery itself--the Chinese call it the Dao and other traditions call that experience other things (in the Bible it’s called “I am that I am”)—but that experience of the mystery is common to all major cultural traditions—all of them! This fact should give us reassurance.

I believe that the role of economics and politics is to serve and strengthen us as individuals and collectives—both are interwoven and inseparable—the Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy is a structure made for twelve-year olds. To me, a culture that features consumerism, escape and narcissism is destructive to the individual as well as society—now, I believe that, historically speaking, we had to pass through this phase for reasons I do not want to go through at this time in order to catapult us to the next phase of human development (which is indeed a phase change).

The crises we face starting with climate change includes dealing with an Empire dedicated to enriching the few and enslaving the rest of us are insurmountable without the quick evolution of a humanity that is dramatically stronger than what we see today. Fortunately we have all the tools right now at our disposal—all we lack is the will to take the risks needed and to drop our old way of life. If we aren’t willing to do that then the blue pill is my recommendation.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  My first read on Monday morning and I agree (0+ / 0-)

    with you. However, it seems that people around here don't like the "uncomfortable" mirror - probably interferes with the functioning of the blue pill. Certainly that's a symptom of the complexity/ego-centrism problem you identify, but I would also add a "confirmation bias" component (aka the echo chamber) to that dynamic. A typical response to the complexity around us is to find the voices that resonate with your perspective (why I'm here in this diary), but more people do that in the narrowest possible terms (to simplify) rather than the broadest (adds to the complexity). Also, it seems to me, people do not like to be reminded that they have a role in (causes & effects of) the big picture.
    The challenge for us is to motivate people who lack the necessary foundation you write about to engage with the problem.

    Irrevocable commitment to any religion is not only intellectual suicide; it is positive unfaith because it closes the mind to any new vision of the world. - Alan Watts On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are

    by ocular sinister on Mon Oct 24, 2011 at 09:27:57 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site