Skip to main content

Cross Posted on Delaware Liberal.

The Wilmington News Journal is reporting that Christine "I'm not a witch" O'Donnell (R-Teabagistan) has filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment against her former campaign attorney, Jonathan Moseley.   Moseley, an attorney in Virginia, is a frequent commenter on local Delaware political blogs, both left and right, always defending the honor of one Christine O'Donnell.  Yet, Moseley has demanded $18,250 for work and expenses he incurred this year defending her against CREW's complaint and in 2008 in her race against Joe Biden for the Senate.  

Interestingly, on Moseley's website that I linked above, right on his front page, he is still soliciting donations for Christine's own legal defense fund to pay off old campaign debts and expenses.  See the screenshots below, of Moseleys' website showing the solicitation in the red box, and the page where you can kindly submit your donation.  

You'll notice that the solicitation is not outdated.  It is current.   And the second page contains many more details not shown in the screenshot, and they are as follows:

There remain legal claims for unpaid bills against Christine O'Donnell, long after her U.S. Senate campaign and her legal defense against unfair demands for her criminal prosecution ended.  Would you be willing donate to help pay off these invoices so she does not have to mount a new (and public) legal defense against new claims against her?

Not only are there unpaid expenses, debts, and claims, but now it is going to get even worse with legal bills to fight over those items.   Having a public, legal fight can only enrich the lawyers and not help our conservative cause.

Do you think the campaign's Treasurer should pay those who actually did the work for Christine O'Donnell's campaign and who researched and discovered the truth about allegations against her?

Or should the Treasurer pay new lawyers to fight against those who actually performed work for Christine O'Donnell and her defense, by raising legal technicalities to cheat those who worked out of their hard-earned money?  Should ‘Friends of Christine O’Donnell’  search for ways to avoid paying those who actually did work for Christine O’Donnell’s campaign?

Christine O'Donnell says she worries about those who donated to her campaign, how they will feel about the way money is spent.  But surely those donors do not want to see their money used for litigation against Christine O'Donnell's own supporters and workers!  [....]

On October 12, 2011, Christine O'Donnell told me, Jonathon Moseley, that there will not be enough money in her campaign committee "Friends of Christine O'Donnell" to pay disputed claims from her campaign and the legal, public, and political defense after her campaign in 2011.

Christine told me that she may have to use her personal funds, which are very limited, to pay for lawyers.

So basically, Jonathon Moseley is raising money on his website, supposedly from Christine O'Donnell's diehard supporters, to pay himself.   Hey, I admire the ingenuity.   Because Lord knows, Christine O'Donnell will never pay a campaign debt unless forced to by a court of law, and even then it is a 50/50 proposition.  

Further, I love the part at the end, in bold, where Christine says the campaign funds are exhausted and she may now have to dip into her own personal funds.  That's rich, pardon the pun.   Her campaign funds are her personal funds.   They reason why they are exhausted is because she transferred the campaign funds to her PAC, from which she is drawing a salary.  

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site