Skip to main content

This is my response to a thread on

WaccoReader: UTNE Article: Chopping Down Redwoods to Make Wine

After seeing the alarming rate of wine grape conversions in this county - be it clear cut of forested ridge tops, with endangered species habitats just below being subject to enormous silt intrusions; tearing out other dry-farmed crops, such as apple orchards; wild land, etc; I now see the majority of those serving on the Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, Planning, Zoning, Permitting agencies and commissions, as being complicit with the criminals who profit from this land rape for fermented grapes.

It took me awhile, then I got it; if the County & State employees' retirement benefits investments are tied to this kind of land use; it's no wonder they keep letting it happen.

I don't know if this scheme was set up by Willie Brown back when he ruled State gov.; or in his more recent role as CalPERS Board member re: their investment practices; but Preservation Ranch has had big Wall St. backers like CalPERS, (don't know if they have pulled out all the way or not. It was mentioned they changed their vineyard management co. Plus, we know planting a few trees does not replace an ecosystem)

It's not just about the juicy campaign donations folks like Supervisor Efren Carillo got from land assaulters like Paul Hobbs, LLC, while he turned a blind eye to the illegal land use practices; and theft of Jenkel's property.

Efren didn't throw Hobbs under the bus, until you all made such a big fuss and he saw his re-election threatened.

Don't ever underestimate the power of using your free speech, loud and often. Especially let stores, restaurants, and the media know, you will boycott them and their advertisers if they continue to profit from these "bad apples"; while they continue to distort the truth, and promote an industry which chokes the quality out of our life here; and exports our water - one case of wine at a time.

Fortunately there are many farmers here who value, and adhere to social and environmental justice. It's mostly the Big Ag guys who abuse and manipulate the rules and tarnish the industry, making it harder for the rest of them. They have the money and power for what they used to call "graft". (I only saw "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" for the first time this year.)

The big guys just pay the fines and do it again; this needs to be corrected. Just don't expect the people paid to have oversight to do it; when their retirement, and next round of campaign funding require allowing "business as usual" to do so.

Just as people are waking up to taking their money out of bad banks; know by whom, your wine was made, and if their practices helped, or hurt the community where it was produced. Let them know, just paying fines and making a donation to a charity, is not enough to cover their damages. Are they ethical when it comes to how they treat the environment, their workers, and their neighbors?

The State has known for a long time, that there have been 800 illegal diversions in the Russian River watershed (Mendocino and Sonoma). This County thinks it's fine for the growers to police themselves on frost protection! The County and State have dragged their feet for a long time; sadly seem only motivated by law suits, in order to take action on these issues.

Recovery for the endangered species, done only by the farmed fisheries is not good enough!

Giving these wealthy landowners money to repair the damage they've done to the watershed is not OK either. Let their profits pay for it; so we have enough funds left to heal our watersheds where the low, and no income folks are having problems.

So many of our precious streams and groundwater have been depleted and poisoned by the wine grape industrialists. The pollution and water diversions by pot growers, (while also not OK), pales in comparison; but you'll never see the mainstream news research or cover that statistic.

Bob Anderson has been this region's prime industrial wine grape lobbyist; and yet he was somehow able to become the Chairman of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, under the last governor's watch.

He'd like to keep the job of a fox guarding the hen house. Please tell Gov. Brown, this is a serious conflict of interest for one of our most precious natural resources - water!

For more info on these issues; look into the Sonoma County Water Coalition

I'm hoping someone, or group will come up with something to make it easy for consumers to know which wineries to avoid, and which to support; like the seafood watch program to protect the species which are over-fished.

There is a labeling program for Fish Friendly Farming; though I'm not sure it addresses all the issues impacted by the industry.

Research before you buy.  Let your stores and restaurants know the brands you trust to be valued social and environmental partners. Recommend they drop the brands which are not. When they get that your patronage depends on it; they will be motivated to make more informed choices too.



On Nov. 17 the BZA will be hearing three winery applications.   There is a growing kickback on the proliferation of “special events”.    Here comes some more.

Thanks for your actions on informed consumption,

Colleen Fernald

Some of this is old news, and CalPERS has changed some of its practices; but one still need one wonder if they just didn't invest in hiding the graft better. We can't only blame big bad banks and Wall St. for the mess were in; let's take a deeper look at how our of system of government enables it.

My question for you is; will you continue to support the Senate incumbent, just because she's a Democrat; even though she's only really working for the 1%?

Here's a few conflicts from CalPERS, W. Brown's & D. Feinstein's actions:

            October 24, 2009

            State Employee wrote:

      I agree with Public Watchdog. Is anyone looking at the sales of properties between related entities and kickbacks relating to inflated prices paid to purchase real estate from intermediary entities owned by friendly entities owned by Willie Brown, Seth Scott and others, who had just recently acquired rights to property at price much lower than what they sold it to Calpers. That stinks of an illegal kickback. This is what should be investigated. The public employees who own Calpers deserve to know the truth about how they were ripped off. This should not be covered up or quietly slipped under the rug because of the political affilliations of the people involved in the rip-off.

...This sure helps with campaign financing on a quid pro quo for DEALS! What a better person is there to have on the CalPERS Board than Willie L. Brown, Jr.???
CalPERS Investigation: Criminal Probe Targets Nation's Largest Public Pension Fund


Now, the $149 billion fund may need a dose of its own medicine. CalPERS, which has 1.3 million beneficiaries among current or former state employees, has developed a rash of governance problems. Revelations that the fund knew about--but never blew the whistle on--Enron Corp. Chief Financial Officer Andrew S. Fastow's self-dealing partnerships were a big embarrassment. The board is increasingly pushing social and political criteria in investment decisions. And there has been a spate of high-level resignations. All this caps a more-than-two-year period when CalPERS' investment performance has trailed that of other large pension funds.

Just as troubling, CalPERS' board seems to have developed a blind spot for potential conflicts of interest. In March, CalPERS put $100 million into Premier Pacific Vineyards Inc., which buys land for growing grapes. The co-CEO of that firm, Richard Wollack, is a major fund-raiser for California Governor Gray Davis, a Democrat, who names three CalPERS' board members.

CalPERS also committed more than $760 million in the past year to two funds created by Los Angeles billionaire Ronald Burkle, who, with his wife, has contributed to the campaigns for state office of two CalPERS board members, Treasurer Philip Angelides and Controller Kathleen Connell, according to the California Secretary of State's office. He previously employed two other board members, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown and actuary Sidney L. Abrams, both have confirmed. Burkle is also a big contributor to Davis, whose wife, Sharon, earned $37,500 last year as a board member at a Burkle company, according to Jordan Rasmussen, her spokeswoman.

Increasing transparency of how investment decisions get made at CalPERS is laudable, said former Assembly Speaker Willie Brown, who served on the CalPERS board while mayor of San Francisco from 1990 to 1995.

But banning the payment of contingency fees to intermediaries who make successful sales pitches to the CalPERS board and staff is counterproductive, he said.

"If I was hiring somebody to assist me in trying to get an allotment [of money] to manage, I certainly would not want to pay for it unless he produced," Brown said.

"Imposing greater rules and restrictions," he predicted, would make it harder for newcomers, including women and members of racial minority groups, to break into the "old-timers' " hold on CalPERS' business.

Water + Career Politicians = mud!

Retrospective: Pork OD Kills Water Project

DEC. 1, 2010


When former San Francisco Mayor and California Assembly Speaker Willie Brown said that a “political earthquake” is rumbling in the Central Valley over water he was right on the money, and it seems that big money was driving the water bond process right from the start.

The history behind the water bond initiative removed from this year’s ballot in June and rolled over until 2012 is illuminating. It was one of the sleaziest proposals put forward in recent memory.

It was billed as the Delta Vision, but the vision put forward by Arnold Schwarzenegger and other key peripheral canal backers like Sen. Dianne Feinstein and agribusiness billionaire and water banker Stewart Resnick would have benefited its backers while costing Californians  as much as $50 billion.


The Desert Wilderness Protection Act

The California Public Employees Retirement System, (CALPERS) is a nearly $80 billion pension fund whose investment clout is heavily influenced by California leadership which includes Sen. Diane Feinstein. Several years ago, CALPERS made a $400 million investment in Catellus. Shortly after CALPERS made its investment in Catellus, the value of the stock collapsed 82%. Dehnert Queen, a San Francisco businessman, filed a criminal complaint in regards to this investment to U.S. Attorney Michael J. Yamaguchi and Ms. Sylvia Scott of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Queen states, in his complaint that Sen. Feinstein "misrepresented facts to defraud a public corporation (CALPERS), abused power and conflicts of interest to defraud State and U.S. taxpayers. In early 1993, CALPERS doubled its investment in Catellus to 41 percent...Queen contends "that both former Senator Cranston and Senator Feinstein acted to sponsor the Desert Protection Act in order to preserve and protect the formal agreement that then Mayor Feinstein signed with Catellus to build the Mission Bay Project in 1984, updated in 1986 and shepherded same through the City's (San Francisco)departments and commissions."...

According to public records, CALPERS investment in Cattelus was through Bay Area Partnership, subsequently changed to Bay Area Real Estate Associates, which is itself comprised of JMB Realty and CALPERS. Efforts to determine all of the participants in the investors' group behind JMB Realty and Bay Area Real Estate Associates so far have been unsuccessful, but at least some appear to have business ties with Senator Feinstein's husband.

None-the-less, allegations continue that Senator Feinstein as well as California Speaker of the House Willie Brown and a wide variety of San Francisco special interest groups would therefore benefit financially. More directly, does Diane Feinstein, as a former employee of the City of San Francisco, Willie Brown and other California politicians maintain a CALPERS retirement account?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    DamselleFly, emmasnacker
  •  Is there a way for someone from the east coast (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    to easily figure out who the good growers are and the bad ones (big ag)?  

    Regarding of the problems I see with new development is that cities and towns are often willing to waive zoning requirements or look the other way, if the development will bring in more tax revenue.  It's like the fox in the hen house.

    I have been involved in two law suits for this kind of thing.  Won both.   What is maddening is that in both cases the city supported the developer.  And in both cases I had to spend my hard earned savings to protect myself from lawlessness.   There is something wrong with the way that land planning works.

    I fall down, I get up, I keep dancing.

    by DamselleFly on Sat Nov 12, 2011 at 01:52:54 PM PST

    •  Clearly these problems are for every watershed (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      I'd like to help with that list at some point; hoping those who still have a job protecting the environment will take it on.

      I'm rather tied up with 2  Occupy cities in California, Santa Rosa and Sebastopol; as well as, running for US Senate.

      Good to know others like yourself are winning.

  •  So I assume the problem politicians are Gray (0+ / 0-)

    Davis and Willie Brown? Are you sure you're in the right century? Willie Brown retired in 2006 and Davis has been out of politics since 2003.

    •  Many former politicians keep graft going (0+ / 0-)

      Willie just installed the new mayor of SF; who will continue do more for the 1%, and Foreign nations like China; instead of the guy who would have worked for the 99%; Avalos.

      The point of the story here is; who are the Board of Directors of CalPERS working for? The Retirees, or the land raping Industrial Wine Biz; big developers, etc.?

      And the other link in this web is sitting in the Senate now.

      Is her husband doing anything to protect the UC Berkeley protester's right to free speech and assembly? Especially after the student body voted in a landslide to keep their Occupy going.

      What is Feinstein doing to keep the fracking, and unwanted Keystone pipeline out of the US?

      Time to elect only those with plans to serve  the 99%, to SERVE in any elected office.

      If Charlotte were in her web; what would she write now?

      I'd need a large web with others to help weave it:

      Occupy your elected officials with a cease fire for all.

      Let's get the troops home for the holidays; and give ourselves the gift of AmericaCARE; not more unconstitutional warfare.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site