Skip to main content

Seriously now. Why did I not just intuitively realize that the solution for the skyrocketing rates of poverty and hunger among American children was as simple as returning to the good old days when children were free, FREE I say, to work all day in menial jobs like doing the janitorial work in their schools.

As Newt so sagely recommends, you get to save all kinds of money by firing all the adult custodial workers, and just have one full time supervisor to direct the kids on their daily rounds of mopping and cleaning toilets.

Here is the response from American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL–CIO.

Go to the link and sign the petition.

Newt Gingrich wants to fire union janitors and hire kids to clean schools instead. Seriously. He wants to assign 9-year-old kids to do hard manual labor cleaning up after their more fortunate classmates. It's vicious, backwards and wrong.

Really, Newt? Let him know what you think of his 'idea.':

The US outlawed child labor because it denied children the chance at a real education and allowed employers to exploit children — and because children were often injured or killed on the job. That's why labor unions fought to pass laws outlawing child labor and protecting all workers.

Thus from a man with millions in lines of credit at Tiffany's, who as a lobbyist for Freddie Mac was pulling down at least $1.6 to $1.8 million dollars. Oh, and that was a little more than the $300,000 he claimed originally. But of course, as he said, he was providing them with important history lessons.

Newt Gingrich Freddie Mac Fees: Former House Speaker Reportedly Received At Least $1.6 Million From Housing Giant

I think Newt missed the chapter in the history books about the sordid tragedy of child labor. Of course, it was all the rage under the 19th century captains of industry and the Robber Barons. Seems a good fit for the 1% and their current takeover of America.

History certainly matches the current GOP emphasis on destroying unions, taking away workers rights, and destroying the public education system. Note the passages I have set to bold in the following.

Forms of child labor, including indentured servitude and child slavery, have existed throughout American history. As industrialization moved workers from farms and home workshops into urban areas and factory work, children were often preferred, because factory owners viewed them as more manageable, cheaper, and less likely to strike. Growing opposition to child labor in the North caused many factories to move to the South. By 1900, states varied considerably in whether they had child labor standards and in their content and degree of enforcement. By then, American children worked in large numbers in mines, glass factories, textiles, agriculture, canneries, home industries, and as newsboys, messengers, bootblacks, and peddlers.

In the early decades of the twentieth century, the numbers of child laborers in the U.S. peaked. Child labor began to decline as the labor and reform movements grew and labor standards in general began improving, increasing the political power of working people and other social reformers to demand legislation regulating child labor. Union organizing and child labor reform were often intertwined, and common initiatives were conducted by organizations led by working women and middle class consumers, such as state Consumers’ Leagues and Working Women’s Societies. These organizations generated the National Consumers’ League in 1899 and the National Child Labor Committee in 1904, which shared goals of challenging child labor, including through anti-sweatshop campaigns and labeling programs. The National Child Labor Committee’s work to end child labor was combined with efforts to provide free, compulsory education for all children, and culminated in the passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, which set federal standards for child labor.

Child Labor Education Project

From the petition linked to above, this letter to the Newtster:

Dear Newt,

Our country outlawed child labor. Almost a hundred years later, in the middle of the worst unemployment crisis in decades, you want to bring it back. Seriously?

Doing janitorial work in a school entails sanitizing toilets, handling hazardous cleaning chemicals, and scrubbing floors hunched over a mop for hours. It's hard to imagine a nine-year old doing any of those tasks. Come on.

The US outlawed child labor because it denied children the chance at a real education and allowed employers to exploit children — and because children were often injured or killed on the job. That's why labor unions fought to pass laws outlawing child labor and protecting all workers.

And the people you want to fire and replace with kids? A lot of them are parents. That job puts a roof over kids' heads, food on the table, and provides them with health care and the chance to get an education. That job is the only thing between a kid and poverty. Firing someone's mom and hiring the kid for less money isn't exactly the "process of rising." It is, in fact, the process of falling. It is the process of exploiting and destroying working families. The fact that you don't get that makes you not only out of touch, but utterly unqualified to serve in any elected position, let alone President of the United States.

Count me in as one more person who thinks you and your ideas are vicious and wrong.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (15+ / 0-)

    "You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you are going, because you might not get there." “When you come to the fork in the road, take it.” --Yogi Berra

    by HeartlandLiberal on Wed Nov 23, 2011 at 05:03:24 AM PST

  •  Newt is a sanctimonious fool (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Pandoras Box, murrayewv

    He thinks it is morally uplifting for poor kids to work for a living. He sees their parents as setting a bad example at home by choosing poverty. Yes, he sees poverty as an active choice, just as he thinks that he actively chose to be rich.

    The kids will realize it is their mission in life to make sacrifices in order to work for little or nothing for people who despise them, and how noble a mission that is.

    And since these kids have no potential to be more than grunt workers—moral rectitude being hereditary, after all—they don't really need to be more than minimally literate. No point in wasting education on them.

    In the same way it is also morally uplifting for the people who force the poor kids to work. Probably he dreamed that God told him to do this God told him to do this in a dream.

    How many impoverished school kids could be sent to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae for $1.6 million dollars to teach a two-way lesson in modern history?

  •  What are Newt's real chances in Iowa? (0+ / 0-)

    Much was made of Cain's failure to assemble any organization in Iowa, and how that spelled certain doom in a caucus state and indicated that his campaign was really just a fancy book promotion tour. Could the same case be made for Gingrich, who suffered a mass defection of his staff a few months back, and has spent as much time promoting books and videos as he has campaigning? Or does he have a genuine ground game in Iowa?

  •  The man is an IDIOT! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    loggersbrat

    If voting made any difference it would be illegal- Philip Berrigan

    by Mighty Ike on Wed Nov 23, 2011 at 07:47:37 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site