Skip to main content

There have been so many that they're all blurring together. And I periodically am surprised to hear there was another one. Eg the CNN-Heritage Foundation Debate in DC's Constitution Hall, where the radio stations that afternoon were all discussing serious traffic delays due to an "event", but I only found out much later that night that it was because there was a debate. That's probably because they were afraid of being targeted by Occupy, and the media chose to play along so that all those Heritage Foundation puppets could get dropped off by their limos in peace.

I guess I could go do the research, and cross-index the number of primary candidate debates this year, with past election years, but hell, I'm lazy. I'll trust in the crowdsource. But also, shouldn't the media be talking about this? Am I crazy, or is this abnormal?

Theories after the jump - feel free to contribute yours...

Brand Erosion: Palin really broke the envelope on the criteria for a (vice-) presidential campaign, and triggered a "Race to the Bottom". I blame McCain for this element, which was truly irresponsible. But Palin paved the way for a swarm of idiots musing to themselves, "Hey, maybe I should give this a shot!". And after 8 years of being strong-armed by an elite core of cynical manipulators who were tactical genii into jingoistically supporting a dangerous moron, the R voter pool and psuedo-intelligentsia had lost whatever rational underpinnings they'd had.

The Celebrity Factor: Again, Palin's dominant here, but this is a discreet issue. Palin's made massive amounts of money flirting with the presidency, even though it was obvious throughout that she wasn't going anywhere. How many of the 2012 R candidates are just in it for the celebrity factor - selling books and speeches for the next X years? And getting hired by Fox?

The Media Factor: This is the sine qua non. They make money running their mouths about topics that will keep the droolers watching until the next commercial break, and having a bunch of characters in play amplifies the drama and let's the NewsBorg run their mouths even longer. We're talking "Lost"-level ad revenue here.

The TeaParty factor: When McCain lost, the R movement found themselves staring at a bleak apocalypse landscape that was terribly reality-based. So they let loose the Hounds of Crazy. And found themselves suddenly at the reins of a rabid, easily-influenced horde of noisy barkers. Sure looked like a movement. The success of the Tea Party undermined the standard kingmaker dynamic, and the main R operatives had made so much money off of the W years, that they sat back for a few years to glut, allowing their Grassroots Crazy to build up influence.

The Obama factor: Obama 2008, based on existing "knowledge", from a campaign perspective, was an impossible long-shot. A newbie freshman like Obama should not have been able to beat the Clinton machine or (as a relative D outsider), the R machine. A shallow analysis of the Obama 2008 campaign could easily lead Rs to think "Let's start thinking out of the box!".

How does this lead to an abnormal number of debates?
The R 2012 primary suddenly found itself with a glut of candidates, and an absence of traditional controls. Suddenly the primary drivers of the process were 1. Candidate greed and 2. Media greed. All that a news channel or think-tank has to do is book an auditorium for a night, make a few calls, and they get a 3-hour media blitz + all the ads they can sell. Everybody wins! Except, of course, for the electoral process, if you're some kind of diehard profit-hating romantic.

What does this mean, from a DK perspective?
1:An R acceptance of Darwinian theory is certainly a worrying development. Next thing they'll be incorporating heliocentricism into their platform.
2:There is way plenty of crazy out there and some of them vote.
3:A flailing R 2012 campaign makes it harder for the Left to put effective pressure on Obama.
4:R's and the MSM are achieving zombie-levels of stupid, which is discouraging for those of us who still believe in rational discourse and decision-making.
5:We have to keep fighting the zombie hordes on issues like gay marriage, education, health care, human rights, democracy and social justice for a few more years.
6:The donkey and elephant are closer bedfellows than we'd like to believe, and the R 2012 primary could easily be a foreshadowing of the D 2016 primary...
7:DEAR GOD, WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN!

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site