Skip to main content

There is much talk about Grover Norquist's influence in the Republican party when it comes to their lockstep refusal to raise taxes on the rich.  The talking points are repeated so often, that many on the left, including the Democratic party establishment start parroting talking points about "job creators" and the "national debt."

The propaganda, which has been honed in during decades of corporatist public relations campaigns aided by right wing think tanks, is so effective that the same talking points are repeated by the mainstream media.  This causes many--even people on the left--to accept much of the right wing framing about this issue of taxes and deficits.

But the careful observant can easily discern the real reason behind the anti-tax cult as practiced by Grover Norquist followers: The total destruction of democratic institutions in favor of the imposition of a corporatist neo-fascist state.  In the final analysis, that's what Grover Norquist meant when he said he wanted to shrink government to a size where it could be drowned in a bathtub.

Here are two cases that illustrate this agenda:

San Francisco Mid-market Community Ambassadors

According to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle, "A new team of city safety workers will hit the downtown streets Monday, relying on their cell phones and bright yellow jackets rather than handcuffs and a badge."

This opening sentence of the article is very telling.  It alludes to law enforcement or policing duties to be performed by these so-called "Community Ambassadors.

And here's the thing about how creeping fascism works... The purported reason for the "ambassadors" is for them to patrol central Market Street areas, and to answer questions from new workers in the area, and from tourists.  And to serve as additional "eyes and ears" for the police.

Think about this... Because of corrupt influence on our government institutions by the powerful moneyed elite, the proper functions of government are dismantled (by tearing down the regulatory infrastructure).  Money and power is rapidly transferred to the plutocratic class, who then uses that power to starve the government off adequate tax revenue for it to function properly.

This power is then used to push down on the labor force (less economic security, dismantling of the social safety net).  Services are cut down, including police protection.

As economic insecurity spreads, crime may start to creep up.  But you also see a growing protest movement, and activism, rising up against the corruption and oppression.

Once the system reaches a certain level of depravity, of corruption, of oppression, it then starts resorting to try an true fascistic methods, including the recruitment of average citizens to serve as additional pairs of "eyes and ears" to the oppressive regime.

Although this "Community Ambassador" program is being presented as something benign, it should raise of all kind of red flags for those who care about civil liberties, and constitutional rights.

In essence you have a group of average citizens, who after being given some cursory training are unleashed into the community to spy for the State.  To collect information about other citizens; to share that information with the authorities.

This is a very dangerous precedence.  A police officer, an FBI agent, or any other government law enforcement agent can't just go around collecting information about citizens without "probable cause" as per our constitution.

But mask what is essentially a citizen on citizen spy program as "helpful," and all of the sudden you have an army of untrained (in constitutional issues dealing with privacy, surveillance, etc.) keeping tabs on people, at the behest of the business community.

Once you have this system set up, and as the economic oppression increases, then it is easy to turn these "Ambassadors'" attention on other "undesirable" and potentially "dangerous" characters, such as social justice activists, protest leaders, an labor leaders.

Finally, once people get use to this idea, what's to keep business districts from hiring their own private security forces?

Detroit's Emergency Manager Proposition

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state of Michigan may step in to run Detroit.  "The governor has taken steps in that direction, proposing an unprecedented move that could give an appointed manager virtually unchecked power to gut union contracts, cut health insurance and slash services."

So let me get this straight... The thievery by Wall Street (with the help of the government) causes a nationwide economic calamity, affecting city budgets, government services, and pension funds.  Grover Norquist's economic cult further exacerbates the problem by further starving the national treasure of needed tax revenue.

And the solution is to strip entire cities off democracy?  To disenfranchise citizens?

I would argue that that is precisely the plan... If you do a little research, you will find that business groups and lobbyists are behind many of these ideas.

An emergency financial manager would have the power to privatize utility departments, as well as the bus system and other agencies. A manager also could sell off city-owned parking lots and even Belle Isle, Detroit's popular island park, said Michael LaFaive, director of fiscal policy at Michigan's Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a nonpartisan group that espouses free markets.

The emphasis is mine... Folks, this is the real reason behind the Grover Norquist "don't-tax-the-rich" cult.  It's to destroy the capability of a democratic government to function properly, so the country can then be taken over by business interests and form a fascistic corporatocracy.

It's treasonous; it's economic terrorism; it's fascistic.  It's not about budgets and deficits, and about "living within our means."  It's a scam.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I would t&r just for this: (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Lensy, Ray Pensador, esquimaux
    Folks, this is the real reason behind the Grover Norquist "don't-tax-the-rich" cult.  It's to destroy the capability of a democratic government to function properly, so the country can then be taken over by business interests and form a fascistic corporatocracy.
  •  When you read the SF article it sounds innocent (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    IreGyre, fly, Ray Pensador, esquimaux

    enough.  Yet it makes me think of the Chinese "monitors" who live in every neighborhood and report all manner of personal and community information to the local PD.

    For all of her posturing, America is proving to be no more free than so many other countries.

  •  I don't think "fascism" is the right (0+ / 0-)

    term, if only because the general public doesn't have anything familiar to which to relate that word.

    In addition, ragging on corporations is confusing because, as a matter of fact, our organs of government at all levels are corporations (artificial man-made bodies).  Destroying one or the other will not leave the survivor in a monopoly position, though that's what the dualistic proponents might expect, because dualism is not an accurate model of reality. If public corporations were destroyed, private corporations would not take their place, if only because private corporations are actually created by and subordinate to the public ones.  If our organs of government are destroyed, then private corporations will cease to exist because they will have no validity.

    So, what's really wanted by people united by purchase is not just autonomy, but control over the public corporations which authorize their existence. What we have here is a case of insubordination.  Moreover, to the extent that the agents of our public corporations have been suborned to champion a take-over by private corporations, they are being insubordinate, as well.

    The issue of the 21st Century is government BY the people. Conservatism and Republicanism are secular religions promoting the notion of public obedience to the nation, the dollar and the rule of law in a godless association that leaves some men in charge. The object is to assert the right to exercise dominion over mankind, which, if men are entitled to life, liberty and peace of mind, involves the destruction of human rights. Dominion of their own kind cannot co-exist with human rights.

    Conservatism and Republicanism have devolved into dominionist ideologies.  I say "devolved" because the ideologies depend on a designation of the human species as less than human, at a more primitive stage of development.

    Humans sustaining themselves by exploiting their own kind is not new. What's perhaps new is the question whether this behavior persists as a primitive variant in the human genome or represents the retarded development of sensory components in some people. What people who resort to conservatism seem to have in common is a bundle of sensory deficits:

    no common sense
    no sense of time
    no sense of sequence
    no sense of order
    no sense of circumstance
    no sense of connection
    no sense of direction
    no sense of balance
    no sense of privacy

    If their behavior weren't being accommodated in the law, it would be/is categorized as criminal.  That is, less articulate individuals, who don't know how to extort monetary support, have to resort to ordinary theft to sustain themselves until they end up in prison.
    The thing is that, if we recognize these deficits in some people and just sustain them as freeloaders, their presence in society would be a lot less detrimental because their coercive endeavors would be removed.

    Take Newt Gingrich, for example.  He keeps spouting threats to extort money from people to sustain himself and buy baubles.  If we just gave him money to shut him up, we'd all be spared the agitation that he and his cohorts would actually take other people hostage.
    What would it take to get Newt to shut up?

    People to Wall Street: "LET OUR MONEY GO"

    by hannah on Mon Dec 05, 2011 at 03:54:04 AM PST

  •  ALEC's wet dream for 38 years... (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Ray Pensador, esquimaux

    in this one statement

    An emergency financial manager would have the power to privatize utility departments, as well as the bus system and other agencies. A manager also could sell off city-owned parking lots and even Belle Isle, Detroit's popular island park, said Michael LaFaive, director of fiscal policy at Michigan's Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a nonpartisan group that espouses free markets.

    this is what they have been working towards with the help of ALEC member Grover Norquist.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site