Skip to main content

Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri
Tea party Republicans made a very big deal after the 2010 election over banning earmarks in spending bills, something many of them had pledged to nix during their election campaigns. They told voters they were a new breed of politician. You know, sort of like all those '90s Republicans who vowed to leave Congress after two or three terms. Like many of their new-breed predecessors, however, the latest crew appears to be following an old habit dating back to the days when politicians first ran for office: breaking vows. Surprise, surprise.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), a leading foe of earmarks that Congresspeople use to bring federal bacon back to their home districts to fund pet projects, first claimed seven months ago that freshmen Republicans had helped to secretly fill the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 with earmarks. Now her staff has completed a report she says confirms it.

In the 225 amendments passed by the House Armed Services Committee during the markup of the bill, McCaskill said Monday in a statement on her website, "an astonishing 113—more than half the total passed—were earmarks. These 113 earmarks valued at $841 million. Thirty-four additional amendments were found to have the appearance of being an earmark, but sufficient evidence could not be identified to make a conclusive determination."

Twenty of these were injected by freshman Republicans, her staff found. It was all part of an "elaborate scheme"

put in place by the House Armed Services Committee Chairman that was designed explicitly to allow his committee's members to earmark in violation of the ban on earmarks in Congress.

“This has to be a record turnaround for members of the House who claimed to be giving up their addiction to earmarks,” said McCaskill, who recently introduced bipartisan legislation to permanently ban earmarks from the legislative process. “These Representatives can insist all they want that they don’t do earmarking anymore—but if it walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.  And it demonstrates exactly why we need my bipartisan legislation to permanently ban earmarks.”

Rep. Howard McKeon, the California Republican who chairs the House Armed Services Committee, rejected McCaskill's claims first made to him in a letter in April. The process was not secret, but completely transparent, he said.

At the time of McCaskill's original claims, a spokesperson for the HASC also said everything was transparent and posted in advance on the committee's website. But the Missouri senator said neither the amounts nor their intended recipients were obvious in the posted material. And, she said, there was a billion-dollar "slush" fund set up to make matters opaque.

Some 75 of the 113 items McCaskill's staff labeled earmarks were introduced by Democrats. But they did not impose a ban on themselves. Twenty of the earmarks were introduced by freshmen Republicans. Not the first time that the 2010 freshmen class has sought to lard up spending bills with pork, and no doubt not the last.

President Obama has threatened to veto any bill that contains earmarks. McCaskill, together with Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, called for a permanent ban on earmarks last week.

The problem with that is, as even some of the most avid opponents discovered after the Republican ban, not all earmarks are bad. Most aren't for a bridge to nowhere or some other cockamamie proposal that spends millions to benefit a handful of well-connected people.

And while McCaskill's diligence in proving the case she made last spring is admirable, the Pentagon budget is infected with many worse problems than earmarks, as in, it's about twice as spendy as it should be. Could somebody put their staff's nose to the grindstone on that?

Originally posted to Meteor Blades on Mon Dec 12, 2011 at 04:28 PM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site