Skip to main content

It's quite easy to sit here and watch the GOP implosion over the extension of the payroll tax cut and laugh at the carnage. I mean who doesn't enjoy watching Boehner get rolled by his Tea Party caucus? But in the middle of all of this House disarray over extending this tax cut, it seems prudent to ask, did the conservatives really win this ideological battle?

I'm pretty sure at the time of original payroll tax cut proposal, many people from the progressive side voiced concerns over taking away some of the revenue stream for social security - one of the pillars of the social safety net, the one responsible for making sure fewer seniors have been devastated by the current recession. The argument went and still goes something like this - once you cut taxes, it's almost impossible to raise them again. And so we can look at that original payroll tax rate reduction as a first volley in making social security less secure. That was the progressive argument against the original cut balanced against the need to put money in people's pockets to help keep the economy from crashing.

And so now here we are a year later and we're fighting over keeping this cut for another year. This time, it's the GOP on the hook for letting it expire (although the really won't) and it's the Democrats arguing to keep it. Democrats arguing to keep something that in the end will partially undermine one of the tenets of the Democratic party - social security.

So I ask, who's really winning here?

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site