Skip to main content

Today's (Dec. 22) print edition of the New York Times frontpages a brief piece on one of Newt Gingrinch's main campaign themes, to which he has apparently been devoting a lot of thought (sic) for a while. The headline says it all:

In Islamic Law, Gingrich Sees a Mortal Threat to U.S.

Now the hyping-up of putative "threats" to the well-being of the nation from "creeping Islamism", or whatever the jargon-du-jour may be, has been a notable feature of the Obama Era (wonder why that is?) - it's scarcely original with Prof. Gingrich.

However, Newt, IMO, gives the game away in an almost throwaway line a few paragraphs in:

But to Mr. Gingrich, whose campaign did not respond to a request for comment, the administration’s language smacks of the willful blindness of an earlier era. “The left’s refusal to tell the truth about the Islamist threat is a natural parallel to the 70-year pattern of left-wing intellectuals refusing to tell the truth about communism and the Soviet Union,” Mr. Gingrich said.  

While the rest of the NYTs' piece (to their credit) tends to challenge or debunk the Newt's overheated nonsense, I think the above quote lays out his (and many another politician's) real aim: to make "Islamism", if not "Islam" itself, the new "communism".
"Communism" in the McCarthyite sense, that is: a real (if distant and/or marginal) threat to our values, but one hysterically overhyped and inflated: not so much for the "threat" in itself: but as a cudgel to beat one's political opponents with.

One wonders what Newt Gingrich's response might to be if he were called on to reiterate his support for a purely secular system of justice ....

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site