Skip to main content

When educational research reaches the public through the corporate media, the consequences are often dire. Chetty, Friedman, and Rockoff released "The Long-Term Impacts of Teachers: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood" and immediately The New York Times pronounced in "Big Study Links Good Teachers to Lasting Gains":

"Elementary- and middle-school teachers who help raise their students’ standardized-test scores seem to have a wide-ranging, lasting positive effect on those students’ lives beyond academics, including lower teenage-pregnancy rates and greater college matriculation and adult earnings, according to a new study that tracked 2.5 million students over 20 years."
The simplistic and idealistic headline reflects the central failure of the media in the education reform debate, highlighted by careless reporting such as including this quote from one of the study's researchers:
“'The message is to fire people sooner rather than later,' Professor Friedman said."
This newest attempt to justify value-added methods for identifying, rewarding, and retaining high-quality teachers (as well as firing so-called weak teachers) has yet to be peer-reviewed, and two close examinations of the study—by Matthew Di Carlo and Bruce Baker—have praised the data but urged caution about conclusions drawn by the researchers and the media response:
"This appropriately cautious conclusion stands in stark contrast with the fact that most states have already decided to do so. It also indicates that those using the results of this paper to argue forcefully for specific policies are drawing unsupported conclusions from otherwise very important empirical findings." (Di Carlo)

"These are interesting findings. It’s a really cool academic study. It’s a freakin’ amazing data set! But these findings cannot be immediately translated into what the headlines have suggested – that immediate use of value-added metrics to reshape the teacher workforce can lift the economy, and increase wages across the board! The headlines and media spin have been dreadfully overstated and deceptive. Other headlines and editorial commentary has been simply ignorant and irresponsible. (No Mr. Moran, this one study did not, does not, cannot negate  the vast array of concerns that have been raised about using value-added estimates as blunt, heavily weighted instruments in personnel policy in school systems.)" (Baker)

Despite these strong and careful cautions, Dana Goldstein has now followed up with a praising piece in The Nation that links to Di Carlo's work, but on balance accepts Chetty, Friedman, and Rockoff's claims and suggests:
"Given the widespread, non-ideological worries about the reliability of standardized test scores when they are used in high-stakes ways, it makes good sense for reform-minded teachers’ unions to embrace value-added as one measure of teacher effectiveness, while simultaneously pushing for teachers’ rights to a fair-minded appeals process. What’s more, just because we know that teachers with high value-added ratings are better for children, it doesn’t necessarily follow that we should pay such teachers more for good evaluation scores alone. Why not use value-added to help identify the most effective teachers, but then require these professionals to mentor their peers in order to earn higher pay?"
Journalists, politicians, bureaucrats, and researchers are nearly uniform in failing to identify the central flaw in pursuing data as the holy grail of identifying and rewarding high-quality teachers, and the persistent positive response to Chetty, Friedman, and Rockoff's study doesn't prove VAM works but does reveal that there is little hope we'll make any good decisions about teachers and schools any time soon.

Teaching in a Time of Tyranny

Ten years into the federalized accountability era designated as No Child Left Behind, one fact of education is rarely mentioned (except by people who do spend and have spent their lives actually teaching children day in and day out): Since 1983's A Nation at Risk, and intensified under NCLB, teachers have systematically been de-professionalized, forced by the weight of policy and bureaucracy to implement standards they did not create, to prepare students for tests they did not create (and cannot see, and likely do not support), and to be held accountable for policies and outcomes that are not within their control.

And this is the fact of the accountability era that has evolved from holding students accountable for test scores in the beginning to the more recent call to hold teachers accountable because, as media pundits claim, teachers and their protective unions are all that is wrong with the U.S.—at least according to Mort Zuckerman on CNN:

"I think there are huge problems in this country and a lot of it, in my judgment, stems not from capitalism [emphasis added] but from the government....

"Because the education is a government function. If there ever was a public function in this country from the days it started, it's public education and we've done a lousy job. Part of it is frankly because we have lousy teachers.

"Part of the reason we have lousy teachers is we have teachers union that say won't deal with those issues. So there are lots of reasons why education is not being properly handled in this country."

If U.S. public education is failing (and that is at least complicated, if not mostly inaccurate) and if teachers are the source of that failure (and that is demonstrably untrue since out-of-school factors represent at least two-thirds of the influence on measurable student outcomes), let's consider where the accountability should lie.

For the past ten years, teachers have been reduced to mere conduits of policy, curriculum, and tests that have nothing in common with what educators and researchers know to be best practice. Teacher have had little or no autonomy in these decisions and practices. To hold people accountable for implementing behaviors they do not control or support is, simply put, tyranny—not accountability.

The teacher quality debate is failing among political leaders, corporate elites, and the media because none of them are teachers, and as a consequence, they are controlling a debate about reform that they do not allow to start where it should—not at how to measure teacher quality, but at creating teaching and learning environments that honor the autonomy of children and teachers as professionals.

The ugly truth is that the leading elite do not truly respect children (especially children of color, children living in poverty, and children speaking home languages other than English), and they genuinely do not want professional teachers.

If children were treated with dignity in our schools and provided the environment they deserve to look critically at the world and if teachers were allowed their professional autonomy and held accountable for only that over which they have control, those children and teachers would likely notice and confront the tremendous inequity being controlled and perpetuated by the corporate leaders, corporate politicians, and corporate media—threatening the privilege that is being protected by calls for more testing, more data, and more accountability.

Hasty and misleading reactions to research that confirms the corporate narrative and even moderate pleas for compromise, such as Goldstein's, are equally inexcusable because they all fail to confront that accountability without autonomy is tyranny.

We are a people tragically enamored with data to the exclusion of humanity, dignity, and the very ideals we claim to be at center of our country—individual autonomy.

And we have sold our souls to capitalism, blind to the reality that the only thing free about the market is that our consumer culture is free of any ethics, free of any commitment to social justice.

Of course teacher quality matters, of course every child deserves a quality teacher. But that isn't something we can measure and force to happen as if students and teachers are cogs in a machine.

So ultimately every second spent crunching data about VAM is wasted time; every moment and penny spent on more standards and testing, also wasted time.

Teaching, learning, and human autonomy are complicated and beyond metrics, but they must become the ideals we put into practice. All else is tyranny.

Originally posted to plthomasEdD on Sun Jan 15, 2012 at 08:11 PM PST.

Also republished by Education Alternatives.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  I love your title! (0+ / 0-)

    I'm a teacher, and there is no way I could work in those circumstances, although I deeply appreciate those who can!

  •  I think your title has got it backwards. (0+ / 0-)

    Either that, or the referents of those nouns are not the same.  That is the accountability and autonomy, which are contradictions to begin with, presumably adhere to one entity (teachers?), while the tyranny is exerted by someone (?) else.
    Certainly, there's no causal relationship identified, nor even a necessary consequence.

    Tyranny, ideally, enjoys both autonomy and freedom from accountability.

    What we the people expect from all the people we hire (public servants, including teachers) is that they meet the obligations of their professions.

    For the most part, public services address disutilities--conditions we prefer not to have.  For convenience, I list them as the seven 'i's, though there may be more.  Seven is a good number for a start:

    inundation (commonly known as flood)
    incineration (wild fire)
    invasion (warfare)
    infestation (pestilence)
    incarceration (malefactors don't like)
    injury (illness and infection)
    ignorance (juveniles do not appreciate)

    In each case, we know that our public servants have been effective, when these disutilities are either negligible or absent entirely.  Absence is, of course, difficult to measure, if not impossible.  So, the success of public services is virtually impossible to quantify and efforts to do so are mostly a waste of time.  
    The market, where goods and services are traded and exchanged is engaged in a whole other enterprise.  The market deals with utilities, aims for profit and measures success as more goods and services being delivered, not less.  So, really, the public and private sector are engaged in totally different enterprises and any effort to convert one into the other is inherently detrimental. The issue is not profit v. non-profit; it's good v. bad.  Our communities are organized to deal with the bad stuff.

    Conservatives believe that all humans are bad and governments are organized to make them good.  That's actually a very lazy perspective.  Dealing with the seven 'i's involves a whole lot more effort than just ordering the lives of other people.

    People to Wall Street: "LET OUR MONEY GO"

    by hannah on Mon Jan 16, 2012 at 04:19:16 AM PST

    •  nope (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      titles, like many commentaries (and poetry), are compressed ideas

      For some authority to hold some person/people accountable while simultaneously denying that same person/people autonomy is tyranny...

      This is a piece about current corporate powers using the word "accountability" to mask their economic tyranny...

      •  Well, in the context of public education, (0+ / 0-)

        there is, as yet, no corporate tyranny.  There's only an objective to extend human husbandry, the exploitation by people of their own kind, to the education of children, "our most precious resource."

        Making primary education a profit center is appealing to corporations which are running out of other natural resources to exploit.  But, privatization is mostly attractive to public officials who don't want to carry out the obligations that go with their positions.  Many prefer to continue with the traditional pattern of doling out resources and subsidies to the crony corps that keep them in office. It's a symbiotic relationship by parasites on the body politic. The corps aren't the instigators; the power-lusting politicians are.

        The rise of government by the people threatens only one group--petty potentates who prefer to rule, not serve.
        Corporations have only those powers legislators provide.  If legislators wanted exercise control, they could.  The example of how unions are being legislatively restricted in Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana and New Hampshire proves it.  Just because Dick Durbin, a Democrat, pointed the finger at financial corporations doesn't mean it's true.

        People to Wall Street: "LET OUR MONEY GO"

        by hannah on Mon Jan 16, 2012 at 05:40:00 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  i disagree with you this. (0+ / 0-)

          Tyranny comes in the form of corporations taking over the whole testing process taking the autonomy from the individual teacher who happen to know their own students better than the the corporate machine. Corporations have become the instigators through data driven results and farmed out grading of said results. Think about it if your school consistently does not meet the standard. Well lets be frank the corporate standard of said testing then the corps set themselves in a position to sell more products to the schools such as prescribed curriculum designed to their own testing. Examples Everyday Math, Benchmark testing materials, state assessment tests (in Colorado known as CSAP), Core Matters, Lucy Caulkins the Denver Public School system paid her one million dollar consulting fees as well as fly her back and forth from California to implement this failed program. The abdication of responsibility and the election of business women/men without background in public education was the precursor to the advent of corporate tyranny in public ed.

          •  The corporations would have no entree (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            if elected and appointed public officials weren't abdicating their obligations to their positions.
            School boards and administrators entertain presentations from corporate salesmen because buying a package is easier than paying attention to the needs of teachers and students.

            Yes, the commercial class is venal.  Public officials being seduced is another matter.

            There is no reason why public assets can't be as well or better managed than private ones.  It just takes commitment to the job at hand instead of a power play.  Lots of people get more satisfaction out of manipulating people than providing goods and services.  That's a problem.  Manipulators are the agents of our demise.

            People to Wall Street: "LET OUR MONEY GO"

            by hannah on Mon Jan 16, 2012 at 10:04:41 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

  •  Amen Thomas! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Having been in the classroom and subjected to the very issues you talk about in the diary you are absolutely telling the gospel of education.
    I find it interesting that here in Colorado the last few Superintendents of Denver Public Schools have come from the east coast with no background in public education and used that position as a stepping stone to enter politics.  Micheal Bennett is a prime example of this phenomena. This is different  aspect of what you speak of here. When you come to education with no background all you have is data to rely on. companies who produce the tests have stumbled upon a multi-million dollar industry that produces no tangible learning results or results that teachers can use to improve teaching at the most direct level in the classroom. I so appreciate your diaries here.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site