Skip to main content

On Wednesday February 1, 2012 (9:31 AM, 417 North [GAR Hall], State Capitol) Wisconsin's Assembly Natural Resources Committee is going to hold a hearing on Assembly Bill 502.  The bill directs the Wisconsin DNR to hold a yearly wolf harvest if the wolf is not otherwise protected under the federal or state endangered species laws.

Many of us were expecting a wolf hunt to occur in Wisconsin but we expected it to come through the DNR's rule-making process.  The sudden appearance of this Bill in the legislature took many of us by surprise.  It was introduced on January 27.

I think a wolf hunt in Wisconsin was inevitable and not necessarily a bad thing.  Further thoughts below.

This is a summary of the bill from http://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/...

This bill requires the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to issue wolf
harvesting licenses if the wolf is removed from the U.S. and Wisconsin lists of
endangered and threatened species. Under the bill, both state residents and
nonresidents may be issued a license. The license authorizes both the hunting and
trapping of wolves. The bill requires that there be a single annual season for wolf
hunting and trapping from October 15 through the end of February. Under the bill,
DNR may limit the number of licenses issued and the number of wolves to be
harvested. The bill requires DNR to divide the state into up to four wolf harvesting
zones. A wolf harvesting license authorizes the license holder to hunt or trap or both
only in the zone that is specified on the license.

Under the bill, if the number of persons applying for a wolf harvesting license
exceeds the number of licenses that will be issued, DNR shall issue the licenses based
on a cumulative preference system. The system shall establish preference categories
for those applicants who applied for, but who were not issued, a wolf harvesting
license in previous seasons, with higher preference given to those applicants with
more preference points. Under the preference system, a person may elect to apply
for a preference point instead of a license in a given year. Each person receiving a
license will receive one tag. The bill also allows the transfer of licenses and
preference points under certain circumstances.

The bill specifies the types of firearms that may be used for wolf hunting and
also allows the use of bows and arrows and crossbows for wolf hunting. A crossbow
may be used by any person holding a wolf harvesting license. For hunting wolves,
the bill allows the use of dogs for part of the season and allows the baiting of wolves
with bait other than animal byproducts except for liquid scents. Hunting wolves at
night is also authorized for part of the season. Under the bill, the types of traps that
may be used for trapping wolves must include cable restraints. A cable restraint is
a type of trap using a noose made of cables.

The bill requires DNR to administer a program under which payments may be
made to persons for death or injury caused by wolves to livestock, to hunting dogs
other than those being used in the hunting of wolves, and to pets. Under current law,
DNR has promulgated rules establishing such a program. Under the bill, the moneys
collected as fees for wolf harvesting licenses are to be used to make payments under
this program. If, after making these payments, there are any moneys remaining,
DNR may use the moneys for wolf management and control activities conducted by
DNR.

As I said above, wolf hunting was inevitable.  For various reasons it took a very long time to get wolves de-listed from the Federal endangered species act despite a growing and robust population in Wisconsin.  The outcome of this lengthy process was a sense of powerlessness among people who were experiencing wolf depredations which only raised the level of antipathy towards wolves.

Wolves are now delisted in Wisconsin and management authority is in the hands of the state.  A wolf hunt could be a good for wolf conservation if the harvest is directed towards those areas where wolves are killing livestock.  A wolf  hunt that destabilizes the population and moves it back towards number that trigger threatened and endangered status is a bad thing and something we should avoid. Ideally conservationists should be able to trade off some level of harvest targetted at the margins of wolf range (where there is more agriculture and more depredation) for security and reduced antipathy in the core of wolf range (more public land, more forest, less agriculture).

My concern with this bill is that it is too much of a blunt instrument.  It mandates no more than 4 wolf zones statewide and places wolves on a list of animals (with beavers, coyotes, foxes, raccoons, woodchucks, rabbits, and squirrels) that landowners may hunt or trap without the requirement of a license.  I fear the former provision may prevent the Wisconsin DNR from being strategic in protecting core areas while directing harvest to areas where wolves are causing trouble.  I fear the latter introduces a wild-card of unlicensed harvest that could contribute to over-harvest.

I trust the wildlife managers in the Wisconsin DNR.  I would prefer that if we are to have a wolf harvest, they be the ones who design it.

Originally posted to OldJackPine on Mon Jan 30, 2012 at 04:48 PM PST.

Also republished by Badger State Progressive and Hunting and Fishing Kos.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tipped, recced and republished to (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    exterris

    Badger State Progressive.
    Thanks for covering this, Jack!

    I started with nothing and still have most of it left. - Seasick Steve

    by ruleoflaw on Mon Jan 30, 2012 at 05:58:56 PM PST

  •  The hunting of wolves anywhere is illogical and (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    exterris

    violates the balance of nature in the wild.  It is we, our European ancestors who have encroached on the territory of the wolves, and probably have exacerbated the issues that many perceive to be problems.

    That's my two cents, as I believe that when you upset nature’s natural food chain, the cause and effect is never foreseen, and the results are disastrous.

    The wolf belongs in the wilderness.

                       "If you talk to the animals
                           they will talk with you
                    and you will know each other.
                       If you do not talk to them
                         you will not know them,
                      and what you do not know
                               you will fear.
                            What one fears
                             one destroys."

                          Chief Dan George

    http://www.defenders.org/...

    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, will make violent revolution, inevitable." - President John F. Kennedy (1917 - 1963)

    by LamontCranston on Mon Jan 30, 2012 at 06:06:13 PM PST

  •  Why does the hearing start at (0+ / 0-)

    9:31? Why not just 9:30?

    Farm boy who hit the city to go to college, WI-03 (home, voting), WI-02 (college), -7.88, -4.26, One in ONE MILLION that recalled Scott Walker!!!!

    by WisJohn on Mon Jan 30, 2012 at 06:29:01 PM PST

  •  What is the fascination with killing things? (0+ / 0-)

    I don't get it.

    To each their own, I suppose, but is this opportunity to kill something that important that they have to act so quickly.

    The current estimate is that a whopping 650 wolves exist in the wild in Wisconsin.   That's approximately equal to the weekly number of car accidents in my semi-rural county between cars and whitetail deer, a species whose population continues to climb out of control in the absence of sufficient predators in the wild.  (Okay, I completely made that comparison up in the interest of snark.  But is it unrealistic?  Not a day goes by without at least one or two, and at the heart of the rut the 911 calls flood in.)

    And that 650 appears to be a bare minimum threshold for healthy population, because they were only delisted from the federal endangered species list for Wisconsin last month.    The state was given only clearance to manage its wolf population on Friday, and it took a grand total of ZERO days to introduce a bill to kill some of them?

    I get the impression that this is all because some blockhead who leaves his little Fifi or Butch in the backyard all day is paranoid that his mutt's going to be devoured by an animal that has no interest in checking out human communities.

    Or maybe it's just because many of the wolves actually have state-issued IDs and naturally tend to vote Democrat. Voter suppression, dammit.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site