Skip to main content

overall asset and opportunity scorecard

While the official poverty rate in 2010 was 15.1 percent, there's a lot of controversy over how poverty should be measured, and still more over how we should view proximity to poverty, the people who aren't poor but are dangerously close to it. Here's another way of looking at that. The Corporation for Enterprise Development has released its annual assets and opportunity scorecard, scoring the states on how well they promote household financial security through jobs, education, health care, housing and financial assets. Do states support very small businesses? Do they provide quality public education and incentives to college savings? Do they have a minimum wage above the federal minimum and provide cost of living adjustments? Do they provide tax credits to low-income families and prohibit predatory payday lenders?

financial asset scorecard

The scorecard finds that the asset poverty rate of American households is 27.1 percent—these families don't have enough savings or other assets to subsist at the poverty level for three months if they lost their income, even if they were able to liquidate every asset they had in that time. Liquid asset poverty, a measure that excludes hard-to-get-rid-of things like houses and cars, is still higher, at 43.1 percent. That means a great many people who are working now, who aren't showing up on traditional poverty measures, are leading incredibly fragile lives and could easily be thrown into poverty by any crisis. As with almost every measure of this kind, there are huge racial gaps—34.1 percent of white households are in liquid asset poverty, in contrast to 64.6 percent of households of color.

These things don't just happen in isolation, as the scorecard shows. States can take action through policy to make it easier for low-income people to save money, strengthen their financial position, educate their children. Expanded eligibility to Medicaid or access to COBRA coverage can mean that a medical crisis doesn't become a financial devastation. But too few states do adopt the policies that would help families achieve the security to weather a job loss or medical crisis or to help their kids get the education to achieve greater security themselves.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 10:53 AM PST.

Also republished by ClassWarfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS Working Class Global Occupy movement and Daily Kos.

You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks Laura my family also (6+ / 0-)

    The radical Republican party is the party of oppression, fear, loathing and above all more money and power for the people who robbed us.

    by a2nite on Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 11:00:05 AM PST

  •  Three months? (8+ / 0-)

    I don't think our household could easily withstand three weeks of no income.

    I support torturous regimes! Also, I kick puppies.

    by eataTREE on Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 11:00:45 AM PST

  •  Burn the village to save it.....Dickensian or (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    trueblueliberal

    Darwinian?

  •  Do I read this correctly? (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Kinak, trueblueliberal

    the deep orange states having an "2012 Assets and Opportunity Scorecard Ranking" of 1 - 10 means that the up to 10 percent of the population belongs to the group who have an "asset poverty"?

    Which states have the highest percentage of people which fall into the category of having an asset poverty, the deep orange ones or the deep grey ones?

    Sorry, I have a mental block.

    "When Injustice Becomes Law, Rebellion Becomes Duty"

    by mimi on Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 11:15:31 AM PST

    •  darker gray means more poverty n/t (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Kinak, trueblueliberal

      compassion for things i'll never know ~ david byrne

      by little lion on Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 11:22:10 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  No, the reverse. Or, different scale. (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      mimi

      The deep orange are the best states, the dark gray are the worst. The top map is the overall state rankings in every category, the smaller one is the assets, but it includes not only asset poverty but things like tax credits and so on, so it's a composite measure.

      •  yes, thank you, I got confused (0+ / 0-)

        because I thought if you have a high percentage point in the "Assets and Opportunity Scoreboard", it means you have a lot of assets and opportunities. Thus, I concluded in my minuscule wisdom, if your percentage point on that scale is low, it would mean, you do NOT have a lot of assets and opportunities and must have a lot of poverty. It's the language, misinterpreting the meaning of Assets and Opportunities in that scoreboard that made me slip.

        Sigh. I don't know, why I am not smarter. God has definitely not wanted me to be..:-)

        Thank you.

        "When Injustice Becomes Law, Rebellion Becomes Duty"

        by mimi on Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 03:30:01 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

      •  It would be nice to know which of the dark (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Loozerio, cheerio2

        gray states are right ot work to states. I suspect all of them. Look for Indiana to go dark gray next year if they don't over turn the recent legislation there to make it a right to work state.

        " The whole world is about three drinks behind" Humphrey Bogart.

        by flatford39 on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:09:38 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  64.6 percent? (5+ / 0-)

    That's freaking horrible... and the GOP running around screaming "they have to work themselves to death because they're lazy!"

    Ugh. I try to stay aware of my privileged position in this society but every so often something like that comes around and just socks me right in the gut.

  •  asdf (0+ / 0-)

    The official poverty rates

    • 12.5% 2007
    • 13.2% in 2008
    • 14.3% in 2009
    • 15.3% in 2010

    Higher then both Bushes, Clinton, and Reagan. Change you can believe in. Only, in the wrong direction.

    "It depends what the meaning of 'is', is"
    Platform of the "New" Neoliberal Democratic Party
    Speaking out of one side of their mouth for the little guy, their nominal constituency, and the other for the plutocracy, their real constituency.

    by Sanctimonious on Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 03:51:39 PM PST

    •  sshhh (0+ / 0-)

      you'll be scolded

      "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws." Mayer Amschel Rothschild, 1790

      by FreeTradeIsYourEpitaph on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:40:36 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  unfortunately, those statistics will be used (0+ / 0-)

      to say Obama has thrown more people into poverty, when, of course, that's not true.

      What people have to remember is that losing a job may happen overnight, but getting officially poorer from it may take some time...

      Many people will hang on for awhile before applying for assistance -- draining savings accounts, selling a car, etc. But go for long-enough with less income (and unemployment IS less income, even if the R's make it sound like a paid vacation!) -- and you can easily slide into poverty.

      George Bush is responsible for those increasing statistics...too bad Dems sound like a broken record trying to make the voters understand that.

      "The corrupt fear us. The honest support us. The heroic join us." Jesse LaGreca (MinistryOfTruth),Tuesday, October 4, 2011.

      by gfre on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:59:36 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  Liar? Idiot? Both? (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      AZGoob, TexasTom

      Do you really think you could post something that inaccurate and not have someone here know it?

      Here are the offical poverty rates, based on the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (Table 5):

      •12.5% 2007

      •13.2% in 2008

      •14.3% in 2009

      15.1% in 2010

      Oh gee, look at that...all of your figures are correct except for the one you are using to try and make a point. How did that happen?

      So once we know that, we can look back at census tables and see that the poverty rate was 15.1% in 1993 and 15.2% in 1983.

      Wait, I thought Obama was presiding over levels of poverty unprecendented in modern times? Wasn't that your implication? But if the rate was matched under Clinton and exceeded under Reagan then what you're saying isn't true? Right?

      You're wrong on basic facts, and you're even wrong-er when you look at the facts in context. The spikes in poverty all correspond with recessions. The GDP decline in the 2007-09 recession was -5.1%. The worst since 1945. The early '80s recession was -2.7%, and the early '90s was -1.4%. So, Reagan and Bush I/Clinton faced recessions 1/2 to 1/3 as bad as the past one and posted poverty rates worse or the same as Obama.

      Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx

      by Joe Bob on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 11:26:21 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  The GDP data (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Joe Bob

        Is that on www.bea.gov? Just trying to be able to pass on some of this information and I want to be able to show my sources, and I am having trouble finding the same numbers you have.

      •  How about "troll"? (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Joe Bob

        If you look at Sanctimonious' comment history, it's pretty much a history of trashing the Democratic party and President Obama.

        Political Compass: -6.75, -3.08

        by TexasTom on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 01:37:52 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  IMO, folks don't get the full picture (0+ / 0-)

          if they think it's all partisan. That is a large factor but there's more at play than the traditional R v Dem thing.

          "Your Actions Are So Loud, I Can't Hear a Word You're Saying" thanhdlu.com

          by toosinbeymen on Sun Feb 05, 2012 at 02:20:11 AM PST

          [ Parent ]

          •  Sorry, but when... (0+ / 0-)

            ...I see a constant history of bashing Democrats and President Obama, there's not much else at play.

            There's nothing nuanced about a constant string of attacks on our own side.  Criticism is certainly not off limits, but a constant stream of nothing but criticism screams out "troll" to me.

            Political Compass: -6.75, -3.08

            by TexasTom on Sun Feb 05, 2012 at 09:17:21 AM PST

            [ Parent ]

  •  We are there now (0+ / 0-)

    My wife's Lupus battle, cancer and just a month ago, a stroke has taken us to the brink. We have lost our house to foreclosure and have less than twenty bucks in the bank.
    Sad part we had great jobs, she is an RN and I have a City job. But after her benefits were denied for disability, we fell back to one income and troubles started knocking on the door. Not much hope at 60 trying to dig out, just try to find a way to retire. Yeah right !!

  •  True for me and my 91 year old mom (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    foresterbob

    how lives with me. If ANYTHING happens out of the ordinary, we can't make it.

    Still trying to think of something thought-provoking or hilarious for this space.

    by LuLu on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:02:18 AM PST

  •  3 months? I'm about 3 minutes away (7+ / 0-)

    I have literally no assets of any sort.  I'm working two jobs but if they ended (one of which may, since it's a small business in a tough economy), I'd be hurting very fast as all my savings are going to be spent on medical bills in the coming months.  Yes, I have "health insurance" but its deductible is so high that I have the privilege of forking over $200/month AND paying my own medical expenses out of pocket.

    I make a bit over $1200/month and somewhat limited in how much I can work because of the current medical issues (which are treatable and I'm going through that process).

    But if I lost either of my jobs, I'd be a hurting unit.  

  •  More people who Malefactor Mitt (5+ / 0-)

    doesn't have to be too concerned about.

    The darkness drops again but now I know That twenty centuries of stony sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle, And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born? William Butler Yeats

    by deepsouthdoug on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:05:14 AM PST

  •  Every time I see one of these charts (9+ / 0-)

    it depresses me that the areas that are doing the worst economically are most conservative politically.  Don't know why people keep against their own interests.

    •  Irrational, unreasonable and firmly (6+ / 0-)

      embedded in a social system that requires conformity.

      Poorly educated, they rely on others to tell them what to think and do...they rely on doctrine rather than reason.

      Look at fundamentalists worldwide and you will see a repressed population who participate in their repression by a willing and arrogant rejection of knowledge.

      They are a crippled people and they have crippled their ability to survive by rejecting knowledge, a humans best survival tool.

      They cripple ALL of our ability to survive as they coalesce into monolithic social groups.

      ...so say I...

      •  And so say I. (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        trinityfly, cheerio2

        I, too am unfortunate enough to live among them.  Career wise and employment wise, I am at a crossroad.  I have the opportunity to make a fresh start.  I think it's time to escape my lifelong home here in the south!

        •  There are some lovely people in the south... (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          cheerio2

          and some very lovely places...but it's not difficult to "broad brush" a region when you look at all those statistically backed little dots on the map.

          Having said that...I live in a rural area in the West and I see many of the same people here.

          Stubborn, stubborn, stubborn...it can be infuriating.

    •  It's time to send progressives off to talk to (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      LNK, cheerio2

      people there about poverty. People did that 100 years ago.

      Thank you to jayden, Dr Erich Bloodaxe RN, Aji and everyone in the Daily Kos community involved in gifting my subscription and gifting others!

      by Nulwee on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:45:35 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I wonder how this compares to other years? (0+ / 0-)

    Americans have always been shitty savers living paycheck to paycheck.

    Is this really new?

    If Obama doesn't deserve credit for getting Bin Laden because he didn't pull the trigger, Bin Laden doesn't deserve the blame for 9-11 because he didn't fly the planes.

    by Bush Bites on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:13:41 AM PST

    •  Yes, but... (0+ / 0-)

      ...several years of a weak economy have surely made it worse.

      Yes, there are many people who have been living from paycheck to paycheck even when times were relatively good.  The number of such folks almost certainly increased during the Bush years of no pay raises and ever increasing debt, so I would expect that this number has been trending upward even before the last recession.

      But I suspect that the recession has added significantly to the number of people in this situation, as well.  After all, how many folks have seen themselves losing a good job in the past few years and burning through savings before (maybe) landing a much lower paying job?  If your savings having been bled to nothing and you then land a job paying half of what you previously made, it's going to be awfully difficult for most people to rebuild their cash cushion.  

      Political Compass: -6.75, -3.08

      by TexasTom on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 01:42:08 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  as you say, this doesn't happen in isolation (7+ / 0-)

    and these last years of traditional politics, whether Dem or Repub, has been sucking the life out of the middle class.

    it's hard to read these posts without asking how do we really, fundamentally change politics and those we elect to "represent us."

    •  If they represented us (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      pfiore8

      these stats wouldn't be so terrible. No, they represent those who pay them, that is, contribute to their election campaigns. Those at the $5000 a plate fundraiser dinners are getting their moneys worth. Look at the trend in the wealth gap.
      The recession has ended. How is that possible? Cuz those at the top are doing very well. Record corporate profits. Record low taxes.

      "Your Actions Are So Loud, I Can't Hear a Word You're Saying" thanhdlu.com

      by toosinbeymen on Sun Feb 05, 2012 at 02:39:49 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  File under Nancy Reagan's Famous (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Loozerio, Nulwee, TexasTom

    "If they don't have any money for food why don't they put it on their credit card"

    CNBC a month or so back had on a winger economics professor from Stanford IIRC bashing the Obama administration approach to reigniting  the economy and one of the brain farts from the prof was that Americans weren't saving enough.l

    No ^&^^ Sherlock cause they don't have any money left over to save you BOZO!

    Response: If you "got it" you wouldn't be a republican

    by JML9999 on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:16:09 AM PST

    •  You make a good point..... (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      JML9999, Loozerio, TexasTom

      ....about people on the lower rungs.

      But, man, I know quite a few people -- some in my own family -- who make a decent living but spend everything they have coming in -- living space bigger than they need, car newer than they need, vacations they don't need at all, etc., etc., etc.

      They'd all be up shit creek if the money stopped.

      If Obama doesn't deserve credit for getting Bin Laden because he didn't pull the trigger, Bin Laden doesn't deserve the blame for 9-11 because he didn't fly the planes.

      by Bush Bites on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:21:00 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Both types of people... (0+ / 0-)

        ...certainly exist.

        Some have no savings because they don't really make enough to do more than make ends meet, while others make good money and just blow it all.

        My suspicion, however, is that there are many more people in the first group than in the second group.  After all, when 40% of the population is living at or below twice the poverty line (that's $22k/year for a single person, $45k/year for a family of four), that doesn't leave a lot of margin.  And, really, even if you're making more than that, you still won't have a lot of margin -- as a single person, I doubt that I'd be able to save much if I were making even 3x of the poverty line ($33k/year).

        So if you look at income distribution in the US, it's clear that over half of the population simply doesn't make enough money to be able to afford significant savings.  I suspect that is enough to numerically swamp the irresponsible upper-middle non-savers.

        Political Compass: -6.75, -3.08

        by TexasTom on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 01:46:03 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Impossible! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    TexasTom

    90% to 95% are middle class -Mitt Romney.

    I don't know what consciousness is or how it works, but I like it.

    by SocioSam on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:22:06 AM PST

  •  These maps (6+ / 0-)

    It seems like every demographic map I see of the country, whether it's this, or income inequality, or presidential/congress/a certain person's popularity, they could have the Confederate map laid over them and not look a whole lot different.

  •  Take note Reagan RepubliCONs (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Loozerio

    they are talking about you, you fools!

  •  It's because we're lazy...especially the children. (4+ / 0-)
  •  The state of Georgia gets an F. (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Nulwee, cheerio2

    No surprise to me.  Obviously, it's the fault of all those job-killing unions and their liberal backers.  They're so powerful here, ya know.

  •  Not enough (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    toosinbeymen
    States can take action through policy to make it easier for low-income people to save money, strengthen their financial position, educate their children. Expanded eligibility to Medicaid or access to COBRA coverage can mean that a medical crisis doesn't become a financial devastation. But too few states do adopt the policies that would help families achieve the security to weather a job loss or medical crisis or to help their kids get the education to achieve greater security themselves.

    All these things we're talking about are true, but they are hardly enough. We need to empower the poor, ensure they have good jobs with job security.

    Community organizers and labor in New Haven are building a model designed to do just that - it's worth a look.  A report outlining the problem and some solutions is here.  

    It's also worth noting that the problem isn't just the policies that states fail to enact, it's the numerous policies designed to make people less secure.  Aside from being true, this has the added advantage of being a better political message - it's always better to go after malice than negligence.

    Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity. @DavidKaib

    by David Kaib on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:36:31 AM PST

    •  I lived in New Haven for a year (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      David Kaib

      and as an outsider I was shocked at the dramatic disparities in wealth levels that give one pause every few minutes. I applaud your efforts but so much more needs to be done. Jobs, low skilled but steady and renumerative. Education. And get the guns off the street. Folks are killing each other and it looks like a police state. It's an acid mixture. On the other hand the community spirit is alive and bright. The people love it and there's a lot to love. A study in contrasts.

      "Your Actions Are So Loud, I Can't Hear a Word You're Saying" thanhdlu.com

      by toosinbeymen on Sun Feb 05, 2012 at 02:59:43 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  Hawaii only ranks high (0+ / 0-)

    because of all the rich people--retirees are a good portion of them.

    Actual local people in Hawaii are quite poor.

    Thank you to jayden, Dr Erich Bloodaxe RN, Aji and everyone in the Daily Kos community involved in gifting my subscription and gifting others!

    by Nulwee on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:40:12 AM PST

  •  So...we've established yet another metric of (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Leo in NJ, BradyB

    poverty to largely ignore. Shiny :D

  •  By itself, the statistic (0+ / 0-)

    doesn't tell us much until we look at the change in asset poverty rate chart.

    "There ain't no sanity clause." Chico Marx

    by DJ Rix on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 09:55:57 AM PST

  •  So, if 50% of Americans are poor or low-income (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Joe Bob, LNK, DSPS owl

    that means the only people who can afford a restaurant with white tablecloths are "upper class"?

    I am old enough enough to remember when a 40-hour, not-even-Union job was enough to afford a house, a car, a reasonable number of children, a full-time homemaker, and a little extra to put aside for college. Even, as a special treat, dinner in a Chinese restaurant with white tablecloths once in a while.

    What happened?

    Don't let millionaires steal Social Security.
    I said, "Don't let millionaires steal Social Security!"

    by Leo in NJ on Sat Feb 04, 2012 at 10:03:13 AM PST

  •  The Confederacy is alive (0+ / 0-)

    And sucks as bad as it always has for poor people.

  •  White Privilege and Reaganomics happened (0+ / 0-)

    Reaganomics.Run up a deficit with military spending and then say, Ooops! Nothing left for social spending!

    Sideways, sly way to kill The New Deal.

    Reaganomics explained, along with positive and negative interpretations:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/...

    White Privilege
    I highly recommend the work of Tim Wise on this subject.

    http://www.timwise.org/...

    http://www.timwise.org/...

    Noodle around for videos of him. He explains the family economics story very, very well. . . . the difference between white and black grandparents' assets and access to credit.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.