Skip to main content

It will take a long time and a lot of effort to rebuild the American middle class and restore the balance between the 99 percent and the 1 percent. The Wall Street bankers and other big corporate types have been winning so long, have been so entrenched in their power, that recreating real democracy in America will be a long, hard slog. We'll win some but we'll lose some, and some of the time we will do both at the same time.

That is the story of the robo-signing settlement that has finally become a done deal after many long months of struggle over it. I have been strongly against it for a long time, because based on the (pretty well-sourced) rumors about it, it was sounding like it would be another sweetheart deal for the big Wall Street banks that had run roughshod over the rule of law in this country. I still regret, and think it is a loss for the sense of justice we should have in this country, that the big banks wouldn’t be thoroughly investigated for every single crime they have likely committed. I haven't seen all the details of the settlement yet, nor have I had policy gurus I trust like Damon Silvers from the AFL-CIO walk me through all the pros and cons, but I suspect when I do see the details there will be plenty I don't like. But I also feel good as I write this that the progressive movement won some really important concessions on this agreement, and that a group of gutsy and gritty Attorneys General led by Eric Schneiderman of New York faced down the bankers and made them cave on some big things.

Again, I've yet to see the final language, but multiple trustworthy sources report to me that the release language on what claims bankers won't have to contend with going forward is very narrow, and that both Schneiderman and Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden won the right to go forward with tough lawsuits they have filed against banking interests on the MERS corporation. I'm also told the money ultimately won by this settlement will amount to $39 billion after everything is taken into effect, which is sure not enough but a lot more than the $15 billion I was first hearing when this process started months ago. On a number of different key issues, lawyers involved in the talks tell me the bankers pulled out all the stops but were forced to cave in the end.

Most importantly of all, progressives won something that was never even on the table when these settlement talks started: we got a bigger, broader investigation into financial fraud through the new task force, co-chaired by Schneiderman, appointed by President Obama.

So in this stage of the struggle, we definitely lost some things, especially the chance for dedicated prosecutors to keep investigating and prosecuting all those robo-signing perjuries, but we also won some important things that open the door for more investigation, prosecution, and forced mortgage write downs by the big banks. We have won our chance to keep the prospect of pressuring the banks alive. Now we have to take advantage of it. We have to keep the heat on high intensity to make sure this task force isn't for show, that roadblocks aren't thrown in the way of the prosecutors like Schneiderman who really want to prosecute, and that enough staff resources are allocated to take these investigations deep into the heart of what these bankers did to our economy.

In a long-term struggle to restore balance and fairness to our economy, you don't often get a clean win. You get a lot more results like this one, where we lost some significant things but won some as well. I will say this, though: Wall Street is used to winning everything, so the fact that our side is winning at least a decent percentage is really throwing them for a loop. Now that we've won a few key things on this settlement, we have the potential to win some big ones that will really matter, like finally holding the big banks legally accountable and getting a few hundred billion dollars in mortgage debt relief. And then we'll figure out what new battles to fight to lessen the power of the 1 percent.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  War is definitely the wrong metaphor. (0+ / 0-)

    War on Drugs.
    War on Terrorism,
    War on Illiteracy.
    War on Poverty.

    We have lost them all, why add one more loss? War only applies when trying to kill state sanctioned people. Otherwise, it is a distraction and really handicaps the cause. This "1%" is a social movement and has to be waged as one, otherwise it will accomplish nothing.

    I voted with my feet. Good Bye and Good Luck America!!

    by shann on Thu Feb 09, 2012 at 05:06:46 AM PST

  •  The Apologist, Ver. XXLXLLVVL whatever. HOW (0+ / 0-)

    many senior scum are headed to LONG jail sentences, or

    are we toooooooooooo busy looking forward to bother lookign at what our Ivy'd up friends are doing stealing?

    The pension funds of millions lost billions on Triple A rated horseshit - and, relatively speaking, you're celebrating fucking peanuts!

    oh well, it will keep YOU employed !


    Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; He thinks too much: such men are dangerous

    by seabos84 on Thu Feb 09, 2012 at 05:32:35 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site