Skip to main content


Marco Rubio: "The majority of Americans are conservatives."

PolitiFact: "Mostly true."

Actual fact: A 40 percent plurality of Americans identify as conservative, not a majority. That's not just a temporary thing for this year; Gallup has never found a majority of Americans identifying as conservative.

It was a different story when Ron Paul claimed that "The majority of the American people believe we should have a gold standard and not a paper standard" for currency. Then, actual fact and PolitiFact agreed: a national poll showed that 44 percent of Americans support a gold standard, and 44 percent is not a majority. PolitiFact rated Paul's false statement "false."

So why is it false when Ron Paul claims a majority for a position held by 44 percent of people, but "mostly true" when Marco Rubio claims a majority for a position held by 40 percent of people? PolitiFact's defense of their Rubio PolitiFail is that:

Our goal at PolitiFact is to use the Truth-O-Meter to show the relative accuracy of a political claim. In this case, we rated it Mostly True because we felt that while the number was short of a majority, it was still a plurality. [...] It wasn't quite a majority, but was close.
That's a helpful clarification of what PolitiFact is all about. See, where you might have looked at their name and seen the word "fact" in there and assumed that PolitiFact was about facts, it turns out that they're about "relative accuracy." Accuracy relative to what? Well, that's for PolitiFact to decide on a case-by-case basis, but apparently there's no guarantee that what they're showing is accuracy relative to the actual facts. They might decide to gauge accuracy relative to how dreamy Marco Rubio is or relative to their fear of looking like biased liberal media if they call Republicans liars as often as Republicans actually lie. Since the Republican establishment doesn't care if you call Ron Paul a liar, "relative accuracy" and actual fact can coincide in his case, even though he was four points closer to accuracy than Rubio.

Sometimes, a claim is worded in a way that there are multiple possible answers to whether it's true. In those cases, it's useful to understand how the claim can be justified or, alternatively, how it can be taken apart. But when a politician says something totally straightforward, something that there's a simple yes or no answer to and PolitiFact refuses to engage it on that level, acknowledging that "It wasn't quite a majority, but was close" but still saying the statement "the majority of Americans are conservatives" is "mostly true," they deal yet another blow to their own already minimal credibility. Which is good, because an organization that operates this way doesn't deserve any credibility.

Originally posted to Laura Clawson on Wed Feb 15, 2012 at 09:44 AM PST.

Also republished by Daily Kos.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site